Literature DB >> 33910227

Evolutionary and biomedical insights from a marmoset diploid genome assembly.

Chentao Yang1,2, Yang Zhou1, Stephanie Marcus3, Giulio Formenti3,4, Lucie A Bergeron2, Zhenzhen Song5, Xupeng Bi1, Juraj Bergman6, Marjolaine Marie C Rousselle6, Chengran Zhou1, Long Zhou1, Yuan Deng1,2, Miaoquan Fang1, Duo Xie1, Yuanzhen Zhu1, Shangjin Tan1, Jacquelyn Mountcastle4, Bettina Haase4, Jennifer Balacco4, Jonathan Wood7, William Chow7, Arang Rhie8, Martin Pippel9,10, Margaret M Fabiszak11, Sergey Koren8, Olivier Fedrigo4, Winrich A Freiwald11,12, Kerstin Howe7, Huanming Yang1,5,13,14, Adam M Phillippy8, Mikkel Heide Schierup6, Erich D Jarvis3,4,15, Guojie Zhang16,17,18,19.   

Abstract

The accurate and complete assembly of both haplotype sequences of a diploid organism is essential to understanding the role of variation in genome functions, phenotypes and diseases1. Here, using a trio-binning approach, we present a high-quality, diploid reference genome, with both haplotypes assembled independently at the chromosome level, for the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus), an primate model system that is widely used in biomedical research2,3. The full spectrum of heterozygosity between the two haplotypes involves 1.36% of the genome-much higher than the 0.13% indicated by the standard estimation based on single-nucleotide heterozygosity alone. The de novo mutation rate is 0.43 × 10-8 per site per generation, and the paternal inherited genome acquired twice as many mutations as the maternal. Our diploid assembly enabled us to discover a recent expansion of the sex-differentiation region and unique evolutionary changes in the marmoset Y chromosome. In addition, we identified many genes with signatures of positive selection that might have contributed to the evolution of Callithrix biological features. Brain-related genes were highly conserved between marmosets and humans, although several genes experienced lineage-specific copy number variations or diversifying selection, with implications for the use of marmosets as a model system.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33910227     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03535-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  68 in total

1.  Naturally occurring, physiologically normal, primate chimeras.

Authors:  Carolyn Sweeney; Joshua Ward; Eric J Vallender
Journal:  Chimerism       Date:  2012-04-01

Review 2.  The common marmoset as a novel animal model system for biomedical and neuroscience research applications.

Authors:  Hideyuki Okano; Keigo Hikishima; Atsushi Iriki; Erika Sasaki
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing.

Authors:  Chen-Shan Chin; Paul Peluso; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Maria Nattestad; Gregory T Concepcion; Alicia Clum; Christopher Dunn; Ronan O'Malley; Rosa Figueroa-Balderas; Abraham Morales-Cruz; Grant R Cramer; Massimo Delledonne; Chongyuan Luo; Joseph R Ecker; Dario Cantu; David R Rank; Michael C Schatz
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 4.  Common marmoset as a new model animal for neuroscience research and genome editing technology.

Authors:  Noriyuki Kishi; Kenya Sato; Erika Sasaki; Hideyuki Okano
Journal:  Dev Growth Differ       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 2.053

5.  Homologies between human and marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) chromosomes revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Authors:  J K Sherlock; D K Griffin; J D Delhanty; J M Parrington
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  Marrow Chimerism in Marmosets.

Authors:  K Benirschke; J M Anderson; L E Brownhill
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Allelic heterogeneity and more detailed analyses of known loci explain additional phenotypic variation and reveal complex patterns of association.

Authors:  Andrew R Wood; Dena G Hernandez; Michael A Nalls; Hanieh Yaghootkar; J Raphael Gibbs; Lorna W Harries; Sean Chong; Matthew Moore; Michael N Weedon; Jack M Guralnik; Stefania Bandinelli; Anna Murray; Luigi Ferrucci; Andrew B Singleton; David Melzer; Timothy M Frayling
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Direct determination of diploid genome sequences.

Authors:  Neil I Weisenfeld; Vijay Kumar; Preyas Shah; Deanna M Church; David B Jaffe
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Resequencing of the common marmoset genome improves genome assemblies and gene-coding sequence analysis.

Authors:  Kengo Sato; Yoko Kuroki; Wakako Kumita; Asao Fujiyama; Atsushi Toyoda; Jun Kawai; Atsushi Iriki; Erika Sasaki; Hideyuki Okano; Yasubumi Sakakibara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Necessity of Diploid Genome Sequencing to Unravel the Genetic Component of Complex Phenotypes.

Authors:  Fernando Aleman
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  8 in total

1.  A complete, telomere-to-telomere human genome sequence presents new opportunities for evolutionary genomics.

Authors:  Yafei Mao; Guojie Zhang
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  A paternal bias in germline mutation is widespread in amniotes and can arise independently of cell division numbers.

Authors:  Marc de Manuel; Felix L Wu; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Genomic basis of neotropical primate adaptations.

Authors:  Carlos G Schrago
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Semi-automated assembly of high-quality diploid human reference genomes.

Authors:  Erich D Jarvis; Giulio Formenti; Arang Rhie; Andrea Guarracino; Chentao Yang; Jonathan Wood; Alan Tracey; Francoise Thibaud-Nissen; Mitchell R Vollger; David Porubsky; Haoyu Cheng; Mobin Asri; Glennis A Logsdon; Paolo Carnevali; Mark J P Chaisson; Chen-Shan Chin; Sarah Cody; Joanna Collins; Peter Ebert; Merly Escalona; Olivier Fedrigo; Robert S Fulton; Lucinda L Fulton; Shilpa Garg; Jennifer L Gerton; Jay Ghurye; Anastasiya Granat; Richard E Green; William Harvey; Patrick Hasenfeld; Alex Hastie; Marina Haukness; Erich B Jaeger; Miten Jain; Melanie Kirsche; Mikhail Kolmogorov; Jan O Korbel; Sergey Koren; Jonas Korlach; Joyce Lee; Daofeng Li; Tina Lindsay; Julian Lucas; Feng Luo; Tobias Marschall; Matthew W Mitchell; Jennifer McDaniel; Fan Nie; Hugh E Olsen; Nathan D Olson; Trevor Pesout; Tamara Potapova; Daniela Puiu; Allison Regier; Jue Ruan; Steven L Salzberg; Ashley D Sanders; Michael C Schatz; Anthony Schmitt; Valerie A Schneider; Siddarth Selvaraj; Kishwar Shafin; Alaina Shumate; Nathan O Stitziel; Catherine Stober; James Torrance; Justin Wagner; Jianxin Wang; Aaron Wenger; Chuanle Xiao; Aleksey V Zimin; Guojie Zhang; Ting Wang; Heng Li; Erik Garrison; David Haussler; Ira Hall; Justin M Zook; Evan E Eichler; Adam M Phillippy; Benedict Paten; Kerstin Howe; Karen H Miga
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 69.504

5.  The Mutationathon highlights the importance of reaching standardization in estimates of pedigree-based germline mutation rates.

Authors:  Lucie A Bergeron; Søren Besenbacher; Tychele Turner; Cyril J Versoza; Richard J Wang; Alivia Lee Price; Ellie Armstrong; Meritxell Riera; Jedidiah Carlson; Hwei-Yen Chen; Matthew W Hahn; Kelley Harris; April Snøfrid Kleppe; Elora H López-Nandam; Priya Moorjani; Susanne P Pfeifer; George P Tiley; Anne D Yoder; Guojie Zhang; Mikkel H Schierup
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Induction of an immortalized songbird cell line allows for gene characterization and knockout by CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Matthew T Biegler; Olivier Fedrigo; Paul Collier; Jacquelyn Mountcastle; Bettina Haase; Hagen U Tilgner; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A natural marmoset model of genetic generalized epilepsy.

Authors:  Xiangyu Yang; Zhitang Chen; Ziying Wang; Guang He; Zhiqiang Li; Yongyong Shi; Neng Gong; Binglei Zhao; Yifang Kuang; Eiki Takahashi; Weidong Li
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.041

8.  Evolutionary dynamics of pseudoautosomal region 1 in humans and great apes.

Authors:  Juraj Bergman; Mikkel Heide Schierup
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 17.906

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.