Literature DB >> 33910205

Micropore Closure Rates following Microneedle Application at Various Anatomical Sites in Healthy Human Subjects.

Abayomi Tolulope Ogunjimi1, Christine Lawson1, Jamie Carr1, Krishna Kumar Patel1, Nkanyezi Ferguson2, Nicole K Brogden1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The continuous availability of open micropores is crucial for a successful microneedle (MN) drug delivery strategy. However, micropore lifetime depends on intrinsic skin functional and anatomical characteristics, which vary significantly at different anatomical sites.
OBJECTIVE: This pilot study explored if differences exist in micropore closure timeframes at 3 anatomical sites - upper arm, volar forearm, and abdomen.
METHODS: Healthy subjects (n = 35) self-identifying as Asian (n = 9), Bi-/multiracial (n = 2), Black (n = 9), Latino (n = 6), and White (n = 9) completed the study. The upper arm, volar forearm, and abdomen were treated with MNs; skin impedance and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were measured at baseline and post-MN to confirm micropore formation. Impedance was measured for 3 days to evaluate micropore lifetime. Measurements of L*, which quantifies the skin lightness/darkness, were made using a tristimulus colorimeter. Micropore lifetime was determined by comparing baseline and post-MN impedance measurements, and micropore closure half-life was predicted using mathematical modeling.
RESULTS: Post-MN increase in TEWL and decrease in impedance were significant (p < 0.05), confirming successful micropore formation at all anatomical sites. When data were analyzed according to subject self-identified racial/ethnic groups, the mean micropore closure time at the abdomen (63.09 ± 13.13 h) was longer than the upper arm (60.34 ± 14.69 h) and volar forearm (58.29 ± 16.76 h). The predicted micropore closure half-life at anatomical sites was the abdomen (25.86 ± 14.96 h) ≈ upper arm (23.69 ± 13.67 h) > volar forearm (20.2 ± 11.99 h). Differences were not statistically significant between groups. Objective categorization by L* showed that the darker skin may be associated with longer micropore closure time at the abdomen site.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that anatomical site of application may not be a source of significant variability in micropore closure time. These findings may help reduce the number of physiological parameters that need to be explicitly considered when developing drug products to support MN-assisted drug delivery strategies.
© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical sites; Microneedle; Micropore closure time; Transdermal drug delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33910205      PMCID: PMC8259462          DOI: 10.1159/000515454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol        ISSN: 1660-5527            Impact factor:   3.479


  45 in total

1.  Influence of skin type, race, sex, and anatomic location on epidermal barrier function.

Authors:  Razvigor Darlenski; Joachim W Fluhr
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.541

2.  Micropore closure kinetics are delayed following microneedle insertion in elderly subjects.

Authors:  Megan N Kelchen; Kyle J Siefers; Courtney C Converse; Matthew J Farley; Grant O Holdren; Nicole K Brogden
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Effect of microneedle geometry and supporting substrate on microneedle array penetration into skin.

Authors:  Jaspreet Singh Kochhar; Ten Cheer Quek; Wei Jun Soon; Jaewoong Choi; Shui Zou; Lifeng Kang
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Variation of stratum corneum biophysical and molecular properties with anatomic site.

Authors:  Diar Mohammed; Paul J Matts; Jonathan Hadgraft; Majella E Lane
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Kinetics of skin resealing after insertion of microneedles in human subjects.

Authors:  Jyoti Gupta; Harvinder S Gill; Samantha N Andrews; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 6.  Moisturization and skin barrier function.

Authors:  A V Rawlings; C R Harding
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.851

7.  Enhancement of skin permeation of docetaxel: a novel approach combining microneedle and elastic liposomes.

Authors:  Yuqin Qiu; Yunhua Gao; Kejia Hu; Fang Li
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Electrical impedance index in human skin: measurements after occlusion, in 5 anatomical regions and in mild irritant contact dermatitis.

Authors:  L Emtestam; S Ollmar
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Variation in skin hydration on the basis of Deha Prakriti (body constitution): A cross-sectional observational study.

Authors:  Umarkar V Suwarna; Vyas M Deepak; Kulkarni B Sheela; Sathe D Kalpana
Journal:  Ayu       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

Review 10.  Review of Stratum Corneum Impedance Measurement in Non-Invasive Penetration Application.

Authors:  Fei Lu; Chenshuo Wang; Rongjian Zhao; Lidong Du; Zhen Fang; Xiuhua Guo; Zhan Zhao
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-26
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Microneedles in Action: Microneedling and Microneedles-Assisted Transdermal Delivery.

Authors:  Dong-Jin Lim; Hong-Jun Kim
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.967

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.