Literature DB >> 33908887

Effects of Age, Gender, Health Status, and Political Party on COVID-19-Related Concerns and Prevention Behaviors: Results of a Large, Longitudinal Cross-sectional Survey.

Arash Naeim1, Ryan Baxter-King2, Neil Wenger3, Annette L Stanton4, Karen Sepucha5, Lynn Vavreck6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With conflicting information about COVID-19, the general public may be uncertain about how to proceed in terms of precautionary behavior and decisions about whether to return to activity.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the factors associated with COVID-19-related concerns, precautionary behaviors, and willingness to return to activity.
METHODS: National survey data were obtained from the Democracy Fund + UCLA Nationscape Project, an ongoing cross-sectional weekly survey. The sample was provided by Lucid, a web-based market research platform. Three outcomes were evaluated: (1) COVID-19-related concerns, (2) precautionary behaviors, and (3) willingness to return to activity. Key independent variables included age, gender, race or ethnicity, education, household income, political party support, religion, news consumption, number of medication prescriptions, perceived COVID-19 status, and timing of peak COVID-19 infections by state.
RESULTS: The data included 125,508 responses from web-based surveys conducted over 20 consecutive weeks during the COVID-19 pandemic (comprising approximately 6250 adults per week), between March 19 and August 5, 2020, approved by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Institutional Review Board for analysis. A substantial number of participants were not willing to return to activity even after the restrictions were lifted. Weighted multivariate logistic regressions indicated the following groups had different outcomes (all P<.001): individuals aged ≥65 years (COVID-19-related concerns: OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.93-2.18; precautionary behaviors: OR 2.38, 95% CI 2.02-2.80; return to activity: OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.37-0.46 vs 18-40 years); men (COVID-19-related concerns: OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.75; precautionary behaviors: OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.67-0.81; return to activity: OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.88-2.12 vs women); taking ≥4 medications (COVID-19-related concerns: OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.40-1.54; precautionary behaviors: OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.20-1.555; return to activity: OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.81 vs <3 medications); Republicans (COVID-19-related concerns: OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.38-0.42; precautionary behaviors: OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.40-0.50; return to activity: OR 2.22, 95% CI 2.09-2.36 vs Democrats); and adults who reported having COVID-19 (COVID-19-related concerns: OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.39; precautionary behaviors: OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.52-0.81; return to activity: OR 3.99, 95% CI 3.48-4.58 vs those who did not).
CONCLUSIONS: Participants' age, party affiliation, and perceived COVID-19 status were strongly associated with their COVID-19-related concerns, precautionary behaviors, and willingness to return to activity. Future studies need to develop and test targeted messaging approaches and consider political partisanship to encourage preventative behaviors and willingness to return to activities. ©Arash Naeim, Ryan Baxter-King, Neil Wenger, Annette L Stanton, Karen Sepucha, Lynn Vavreck. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 28.04.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; advice; behavior; concern; economy; health care provider; health information; prevention; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33908887     DOI: 10.2196/24277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill        ISSN: 2369-2960


  9 in total

1.  Social Media Polarization and Echo Chambers in the Context of COVID-19: Case Study.

Authors:  Julie Jiang; Xiang Ren; Emilio Ferrara
Journal:  JMIRx Med       Date:  2021-08-05

2.  A five-nation study of the impact of political leaning and perception of crisis severity on the preference for female and minority leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ruri Takizawa; Sarah Robinson; Cristina Aelenei; Vincenzo Iacoviello; Clara Kulich
Journal:  Curr Res Ecol Soc Psychol       Date:  2022-07-09

3.  Pet Owners' Perceptions of COVID-19, Zoonotic Disease, and Veterinary Medicine: The Impact of Demographic Characteristics.

Authors:  Lauren Powell; Tyler M Lavender; Chelsea L Reinhard; Brittany Watson
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-19

4.  Cross-sectional study of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs and prevention behaviours among adults in Senegal.

Authors:  Matthew Kearney; Marta Bornstein; Marieme Fall; Roch Nianogo; Deborah Glik; Philip Massey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Explaining racial/ethnic and socioeconomic differences in COVID protective behavior.

Authors:  Raymond Swisher; Ginny Garcia-Alexander; Lynne Cossman; Drew Schaefer
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2022-06-15

6.  COVID-19 Information Sources and Health Behaviors During Pregnancy: Results From a Prenatal App-Embedded Survey.

Authors:  James Bohnhoff; Alexander Davis; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Tamar Krishnamurti
Journal:  JMIR Infodemiology       Date:  2021-12-07

7.  Individual differences in COVID-19 mitigation behaviors: The roles of age, gender, psychological state, and financial status.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Michael J Strube; Leonard Green; Sandra Hale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Age Differences in Preferred Methods of Obtaining and Understanding Health Related Information During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia.

Authors:  Nathan Williams; Terry Haines; Cylie Williams; Kelly-Ann Bowles; Keith D Hill
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-13

9.  Circulating Illness and Changes in Thermometer Use Behavior: Series of Cross-sectional Analyses.

Authors:  Jack Seifarth; Megan Pinaire; John Zicker; Inder Singh; Danielle Bloch
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-09-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.