Literature DB >> 3390837

Immunospecific saturable clearance mechanisms for indium-111-labeled anti-melanoma monoclonal antibody 96.5 in humans.

J L Murray1, L M Lamki, L J Shanken, M E Blake, C E Plager, R S Benjamin, S Schweighardt, M W Unger, M G Rosenblum.   

Abstract

Liver uptake of 111In-labeled monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) remains a significant problem in radioimaging studies to date. To determine if the observed liver uptake of an 111In-labeled anti-melanoma antibody 96.5 (111In-96.5) was dependent on the presence of hepatic antigen or on recognition of circulating murine antibody, escalating doses of an unlabeled nonimmunoreactive MoAb (NIR-MoAb) were administered to 18 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma either 1 or 24 h prior to an infusion of 1 mg of 111In-96.5. The number of metastases imaged, pharmacokinetics, and the ratio of radioactivity (expressed as average counts/pixel) in liver (L), spleen (S), bone (B), and kidney (K) compared to blood pool (heart = H) were examined. Results were prospectively compared with data from six patients who received immunoreactive unlabeled 96.5 prior to 111In-96.5. Increasing dose or changes in the preinfusion time of NIR-MoAb had no significant effect on the biodistribution of 111In-96.5. In contrast, patients who received unlabeled, immunoreactive 96.5 prior to 111In-96.5 infusion demonstrated a significant drop [P less than 0.001] in the liver/heart ratio of radioactivity [2.81 +/- 0.35 (SEM)] compared to patients receiving the identical dose of NIR-MoAb [10.35 +/- 1.33]. Significant decreases in spleen/heart and bone/heart ratios were also observed. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that the volume of distribution (Vd) and the plasma t1/2 both decreased when 96.5 was administered compared to NIR-MoAb. In addition, a 4-fold increase in concentration X time was obtained after 96.5 antibody was administered compared to NIR-MoAb. More metastases were imaged in patients receiving preinfusions of 96.5 (23 of 28) than in patients receiving NIR-MoAb (10 of 18; P less than 0.05). Although tissue distribution of 111In-labeled antibody can be ascribed to nonspecific organ clearance of murine antibodies, a substantial component of tissue disposition of antibody 96.5 was shown to be a consequence of specific clearance of immunoreactive antibody which may cross-react with tissue antigens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3390837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  5 in total

Review 1.  Immunoscintigraphy for cancer detection: "a thousand ills require a thousand cures".

Authors:  S H de Bie; T C Ferreira; E K Pauwels; F J Cleton
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Understanding the in vivo fate of radioimmunoconjugates for nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Delphine Vivier; Sai Kiran Sharma; Brian M Zeglis
Journal:  J Labelled Comp Radiopharm       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 1.921

3.  Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of a new anti-episialin monoclonal antibody 139H2 in ovarian-cancer-bearing nude mice.

Authors:  C F Molthoff; H M Pinedo; H M Schlüper; E Boven
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  A pharmacokinetic model describing the removal of circulating radiolabeled antibody by extracorporeal immunoadsorption.

Authors:  C Hartmann; D C Bloedow; D G Dienhart; R Kasliwal; T K Johnson; R Gonzalez; P A Bunn
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1991-08

5.  Gamma probes and their use in tumor detection in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ismet Sarikaya; Ali Sarikaya; Richard C Reba
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-11-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.