Literature DB >> 33908180

Machine learning algorithm outperforms fibrosis markers in predicting significant fibrosis in biopsy-confirmed NAFLD.

Gong Feng1, Kenneth I Zheng2, Yang-Yang Li3, Rafael S Rios2, Pei-Wu Zhu4, Xiao-Yan Pan5, Gang Li2, Hong-Lei Ma2, Liang-Jie Tang2, Christopher D Byrne6, Targher Giovanni7, Na He8, Man Mi1, Yong-Ping Chen2,9,10, Ming-Hua Zheng2,9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of significant liver fibrosis is a key determinant of long-term prognosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to develop a novel machine learning algorithm (MLA) to predict fibrosis severity in NAFLD and compared it with the most widely used non-invasive fibrosis biomarkers.
METHODS: We used a cohort of 553 adults with biopsy-proven NAFLD, who were randomly divided into a training cohort (n=278) for the development of both logistic regression model (LRM) and MLA, and a validation cohort (n=275). Significant fibrosis was defined as fibrosis stage F≥2. MLA and LRM were derived from variables that were selected using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithm.
RESULTS: In the training cohort, the variables selected by LASSO algorithm were body mass index, pro-collagen type III, collagen type IV, aspartate aminotransferase and albumin-to-globulin ratio. The diagnostic accuracy of MLA showed the highest values of area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC: 0.902, 95%CI 0.869-0.904) for identifying fibrosis F≥2. The LRM AUROC was 0.764, 95%CI 0.710-0.816) and significantly better than the AST-to-Platelet ratio (AUROC 0.684, 95%CI 0.605-0.762), FIB-4 score (AUROC 0.594, 95%CI 0.503-0.685) and NAFLD Fibrosis Score (AUROC 0.557, 95%CI 0.470-0.644). In the validation cohort, MLA also showed the highest AUROC (0.893, 95%CI 0.864-0.901). The diagnostic accuracy of MLA outperformed that of LRM in all subgroups considered.
CONCLUSIONS: Our newly developed MLA algorithm has excellent diagnostic performance for predicting fibrosis F≥2 in patients with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Fibrosis; Liver biopsy; Machine learning algorithm; NAFLD

Year:  2021        PMID: 33908180     DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  3 in total

1.  Development and validation of a neural network for NAFLD diagnosis.

Authors:  Paolo Sorino; Angelo Campanella; Caterina Bonfiglio; Antonella Mirizzi; Isabella Franco; Antonella Bianco; Maria Gabriella Caruso; Giovanni Misciagna; Laura R Aballay; Claudia Buongiorno; Rosalba Liuzzi; Anna Maria Cisternino; Maria Notarnicola; Marisa Chiloiro; Francesca Fallucchi; Giovanni Pascoschi; Alberto Rubén Osella
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT for staging liver fibrosis: an update for image biomarker.

Authors:  Jincheng Wang; Shengnan Tang; Yingfan Mao; Jin Wu; Shanshan Xu; Qi Yue; Jun Chen; Jian He; Yin Yin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 9.029

Review 3.  Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology consensus statement on metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Wah-Kheong Chan; Soek-Siam Tan; Siew-Pheng Chan; Yeong-Yeh Lee; Hoi-Poh Tee; Sanjiv Mahadeva; Khean-Lee Goh; Anis Safura Ramli; Feisul Mustapha; Nik Ritza Kosai; Raja Affendi Raja Ali
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.369

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.