Literature DB >> 33907936

Postsurgical oral symptoms after insertion of one or two implants for mandibular overdentures: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial.

Gabriela Pereira de Resende1, Ana Paula Dias1, José Luiz Rodrigues Leles2,3, João Antônio Chaves de Souza4, Cláudio Rodrigues Leles5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the short-term postsurgical symptoms after insertion of one or two implants for retention of a mandibular overdenture. This study investigated whether the less invasive single-implant approach results in lower postoperative symptoms compared to the conventional two-implant overdenture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received new complete dentures and were randomly assigned to groups receiving one or two single-stage, early-loaded hydrophilic implants, inserted in the midline (n = 23), or the lateral incisor-canine area bilaterally (n = 24). Patient-reported postoperative symptoms were measured in a 0-100 visual analogue scale concerning pain in the surgical area, pain when chewing, bleeding, swelling, and unpleasantness. Data collection occurred 24 h and 7 and 21 days after surgery. Demographic and clinical features (smoking habit, classification of the residual ridges, and mucosal width and thickness at the implant sites), osteotomy for alveolar bone reduction, and surgery time were tested as predictors of symptom levels.
RESULTS: Overall reported symptoms were mild and self-limited, with high rates of complete remission after the early loading period of 3 weeks. Progressive improvement of symptoms occurred from the 24-h to the 7-day and 21-day follow-ups (p < 0.001), similarly in both groups. None of the clinical predictors was significantly associated with the changes in symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the insertion of one or two implants may result in similar postoperative outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The severity of short-term postoperative symptoms may not be a critical factor for the decision between overdenture treatment with one or two implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implant-supported overdenture; Mandibular overdenture; Postoperative pain; Randomized clinical trial

Year:  2021        PMID: 33907936     DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00321-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Implant Dent        ISSN: 2198-4034


  24 in total

Review 1.  The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients.

Authors:  J S Feine; G E Carlsson; M A Awad; A Chehade; W J Duncan; S Gizani; T Head; G Heydecke; J P Lund; M MacEntee; R Mericske-Stern; P Mojon; J A Morais; I Naert; A G T Payne; J Penrod; G T Stoker; A Tawse-Smith; T D Taylor; J M Thomason; W M Thomson; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Gerodontology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Factors influencing edentulous patients' preferences for prosthodontic treatment.

Authors:  C R Leles; N P Ferreira; A H Vieira; A C V Campos; E T Silva
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.837

3.  Assessment of pain associated with the surgical placement of dental implants.

Authors:  Areej K Al-Khabbaz; Terrence J Griffin; Khalaf F Al-Shammari
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 4.  Postoperative pain control.

Authors:  Jessica Lovich-Sapola; Charles E Smith; Christopher P Brandt
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Choosing or refusing oral implants: a prospective study of edentulous volunteers for a clinical trial.

Authors:  Joanne N Walton; Michael I MacEntee
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  A risk factor analysis of accumulated postoperative pain and swelling sensation after dental implant surgery using a cellular phone-based real-time assessment.

Authors:  Ryuta Kuroi; Hajime Minakuchi; Emilio Satoshi Hara; Aya Kawakami; Kenji Maekawa; Hiroki Okada; Takuo Kuboki
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.642

7.  Patient-reported outcome measures after routine periodontal and implant surgical procedures.

Authors:  Wah Ching Tan; Gita Krishnaswamy; Marianne M A Ong; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 8.728

8.  A parallel 3-group randomised clinical trial comparing different implant treatment options for the edentulous mandible: 1-year effects on dental patient-reported outcomes and chewing function.

Authors:  Roberto Hartmann; Ana Clara Freitas de Menezes Bandeira; Sara Cristina de Araújo; Urs Brägger; Martin Schimmel; Cláudio Rodrigues Leles
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.837

9.  An RCT comparing patient-centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement.

Authors:  Marjolein Vercruyssen; Antoon De Laat; Wim Coucke; Marc Quirynen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 10.  Clinical parameters of implants placed in healed sites using flapped and flapless techniques: A systematic review.

Authors:  O Llamas-Monteagudo; P Girbés-Ballester; J Viña-Almunia; D Peñarrocha-Oltra; M Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.