Clinical Outcomes in Iraqi Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Following Earlier or Later Treatment with Etanercept.

PURPOSE: The development of evidence-based guidelines on early pharmacotherapeutic treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) could be useful in Middle Eastern nations striving to improve outcomes in patients with this chronic, debilitating disease. Evidence obtained from local populations should inform such guidelines and therefore our aim was to use real-world data to evaluate the clinical responses of Iraqi patients with RA who received earlier or later treatment with the TNF inhibitor etanercept. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients registered in the Iraq National Center of Rheumatology database from May 2012 to December 2018, inclusive, were analyzed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, meeting the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for RA, referral for etanercept treatment, and ≥1 year of follow-up after etanercept initiation. Patients were excluded if they had received another biologic for RA. Included patients were categorized according to two separate stratifications: whether duration of RA symptoms prior to etanercept initiation was ≤10 or >10 years (10 years represented the mean duration for the entire analysis population); and according to whether duration of RA symptoms prior to etanercept initiation was ≤1, >1 to ≤4, >4 to ≤10, >10 to ≤20, or >20 years. The evaluated outcomes were mean change from baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) after 1 year of etanercept treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 979 patients were included. CDAI and DAS28 were significantly reduced (p<0.001 for both) after 1 year of etanercept treatment irrespective of whether duration of RA symptoms prior to treatment was ≤10 or >10 years. Patients with RA symptoms for ≤1 year prior to etanercept initiation showed a significant reduction in CDAI after 1 year of treatment (p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: Iraqi patients with RA who received earlier treatment with etanercept had superior outcomes compared with those who received later treatment.

Introduction

Initiating pharmacotherapy soon after the onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) reduces the progression of joint damage and improves long-term outcomes.1–3 The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) therefore recommends that treatment with a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) should be initiated as soon as a diagnosis of RA is made because untreated disease does not remit spontaneously.4 The clinical outcomes of patients with RA have improved considerably since the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) class of biologic DMARDs was introduced, with etanercept being the first in 1998.5 Etanercept has a clinical profile that has been extensively characterized in both randomized controlled trials and real-world studies conducted over a period of more than 20 years.

Evidence from the Middle East suggests that the management of patients with RA in this region could be further optimized.6–8 In Iraq there are national guidelines on the treatment of RA that are endorsed by the Ministry of Health, but which are not formally published, and Iraqi rheumatologists are guided by these in addition to publications from EULAR and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Patients with RA in Iraq receive methotrexate as a first-line treatment and become eligible to initiate a biologic, such as etanercept, if they have established, severe, and active symptoms of RA after ≥3 months of treatment with methotrexate (25 mg/week; or alternative conventional synthetic DMARD in case of methotrexate intolerance) and ≥2 of the following prognostic factors: smoking, very high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein results, very high rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody results, radiologic evidence of joint damage, or the presence of nodules or other extra-articular features. The development of new national guidelines on early therapeutic intervention could be one way to improve outcomes in Iraqi patients and this requires evidence obtained from studies in local populations. The aim of the present study was to use real-world data to evaluate the clinical responses of Iraqi patients with RA who received earlier or later treatment with the TNFi etanercept.

Patients and Methods

Study Design

This was a retrospective, observational study of real-world patient data entered into the Iraq National Center of Rheumatology database between May 2012 and December 2018, inclusive. Patients were included in the analysis if they were aged ≥18 years, met the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for RA, had been referred for treatment with etanercept, and had ≥1 year of follow up after initiating etanercept. Patients were excluded if they had ever received any biologic agent for RA other than etanercept. Included patients were categorized according to two separate stratifications in order to investigate the relationship between outcomes and the duration of RA symptoms prior to etanercept initiation. The first stratification categorized patients into two groups according to whether the duration of RA symptoms prior to etanercept initiation was ≤10 or >10 years, with 10 years representing the mean duration of RA symptoms for the entire analysis population. The second stratification categorized patients into five groups according to the duration of RA symptoms prior to etanercept initiation: ≤1, >1 to ≤4, >4 to ≤10, >10 to ≤20, and >20 years.

All of the patients whose data were included in this study provided informed consent. The study and its protocol were approved by the ethics committee of Baghdad Teaching Hospital and all aspects of the study’s conduct followed the principles laid out in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Outcomes and Statistical Analysis

Clinical response to etanercept treatment was assessed by evaluating mean changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28, calculated using ESR data) from baseline to 1 year after initiation of treatment. Two-sided, independent-sample t-tests were used to assess the statistical significance of clinical responses after 1 year of treatment and Mann–Whitney U-tests were used for non-parametric comparisons (IBM® SPSS Statistics v22). Results were considered statistically significant if p<0.05 without multiplicity adjustment.

Results

A total of 979 Iraqi patients with RA were included in the analysis, 813 (83%) of whom were women (Table 1). None of the included patients had ever received a biologic agent for any indication except for receiving etanercept for RA. The mean duration of RA symptoms prior to the initiation of etanercept treatment was 10 years. Patients who initiated etanercept treatment <10 years after the onset of RA symptoms were significantly younger and had a significantly shorter mean duration of RA symptoms, as well as significantly lower CDAI and DAS28. A significantly greater proportion of the patients who initiated etanercept treatment >10 years after the onset of RA symptoms were women.

Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of Iraqi Patients with RA Who Initiated Etanercept Treatment

Patient Characteristics	All Patients, N=979	Earlier Tx (≤10 Years Since Onset of RA), n=579	Later Tx (>10 Years Since Onset of RA), n=400	p value (Earlier vs Later Tx)
Female, n (%)	813 (83)	469 (81)	344 (86)	0.046
Age, years	48.1 ± 12.1	45.2 ± 12.2	52.2 ± 10.6	<0.001
Duration of RA symptoms prior to etanercept Tx, years	10.1 ± 8.3	4.7 ± 2.4	18.0 ± 7.4	<0.001
CDAI	27.7 ± 11.6	27.0 ± 11.8	28.6 ± 11.4	0.044
DAS28	5.7 ± 1.2	5.6 ± 1.2	5.8 ± 1.2	0.031
Methotrexate Tx, n (%)	535 (55)	326 (56)	209 (52)	Not significant
Prednisolone Tx, n (%)	427 (44)	247 (43)	180 (45)	Not significant

Note: Data are mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise noted.

Abbreviations: CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; DAS28, 28-joint Disease Activity Score; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; Tx, treatment.

In terms of clinical outcomes, CDAI and DAS28 were significantly reduced (p<0.001 for both) after 1 year of etanercept treatment irrespective of whether the duration of RA symptoms prior to treatment was ≤10 or >10 years (Figure 1A and B). Patients with RA symptoms for ≤1 year prior to etanercept initiation showed a statistically significant reduction in CDAI after 1 year of treatment (p=0.01) while those with a duration of RA symptoms prior to etanercept initiation of >1 to ≤4, >4 to ≤10, >10 to ≤20, or >20 years showed numerical reductions that did not achieve statistical significance (Figure 2A). The numerical reductions in DAS28 observed in patients with RA symptoms of ≤1, >1 to ≤4, >4 to ≤10, >10 to ≤20, or >20 years did not achieve statistical significance after 1 year of treatment (Figure 2B).

Figure 1

Change from baseline in (A) CDAI and (B) DAS28 in Iraqi patients stratified according to whether duration of RA symptoms prior to etanercept initiation was less than or greater than the population mean of 10 years.

Figure 2

Change from baseline in (A) CDAI and (B) DAS28 in Iraqi patients stratified according to the duration of RA prior to etanercept initiation.

Discussion

The results of our analysis show that Iraqi patients with RA who received treatment with etanercept for 1 year had significant improvements in CDAI and DAS28 irrespective of whether the duration of their RA symptoms prior to treatment was below or above the cohort mean of 10 years. Patients with a mean duration of RA symptoms prior to etanercept initiation of ≤1 year showed a significant improvement in CDAI after 1 year of treatment. Overall, our data provide further evidence of the importance of initiating pharmacotherapeutic treatment of RA soon after symptoms manifest.1–3

The mean duration of RA symptoms prior to etanercept initiation was 10 years in the Iraqi cohort evaluated in this analysis, which indicates a considerable delay in the initiation of biologic treatment and this is likely to have influenced the extent of the patients’ responses to etanercept. The delay in referral for treatment with etanercept may be due to a lack of awareness of rheumatic disease among the Iraqi public, a lack of knowledge among Iraqi health care professionals, or a combination of both,6–8 although it should also be noted that there is very limited access to treatment with biologics for patients with RA in Iraq. Access to this type of treatment is provided solely by the national Ministry of Health and patients with RA who initiate biologics tend to be those who have very severe symptoms and have failed on maximum-dose methotrexate and another DMARD. As well as the delay in referral for etanercept treatment, another noteworthy aspect of the cohort included in our study was that there was a significantly greater proportion of women among the group with a duration of RA symptoms >10 years prior to etanercept initiation compared with those with a duration of symptoms <10 years, although the difference was modest (86 vs 81%; p=0.46). The reason for this gender difference is unclear and requires further research in order for its basis to be understood and appropriately mitigated.

To our knowledge there have not been any previous publications that describe a cohort of patients with RA of a similar size from Iraq or the wider Middle East region. A Phase 4, open-label study of tocilizumab, a biologic that targets the IL-6 receptor, was conducted across 5 Middle Eastern countries (Bahrain, Iran, Kuwait, Qatar, and the UAE) from 2010 to 2011 and reported a reduction in mean DAS28 from a baseline value of 6.1 to 2.1 after 24 weeks of treatment.9 The 95 patients included in the study of tocilizumab had a similar baseline DAS28 to the patients in our study (6.1 vs 5.7), as well as a similar mean age at baseline (44.9 years vs 48.1 years), but the tocilizumab study did not report the mean duration of RA symptoms prior to treatment with tocilizumab and this confounds any comparison of the extent of the treatment effect observed.

Our retrospective, observational study has some limitations. First, the data describing the duration of RA symptoms prior to etanercept initiation obtained from the Iraq National Center of Rheumatology database relied on the ability of patients to accurately recollect their onset, which in some cases was a long time. Second, our study focused on outcomes relating to the clinical effectiveness of etanercept and did not evaluate safety or quality-of-life outcomes that are important aspects of any treatment’s overall clinical profile. Third, we evaluated CDAI and DAS28 as clinical outcomes but did not investigate changes in the diagnostic imaging of joint degradation, which is a key disease process that treatments for RA aim to arrest as much as possible.

Conclusion

Iraqi patients with RA who receive earlier treatment with etanercept have superior outcomes compared with those who receive later treatment. Increasing the awareness of RA and the importance of early treatment with a biological DMARD such as etanercept among health care professionals in Iraq should help to improve outcomes for Iraqi patients with this chronic, debilitating disease.