Literature DB >> 33907340

Does the Hopelessness Theory Account for Sex Differences in Depressive Symptoms Among Young Adults?

Lindsey B Stone1, Brandon E Gibb1, Meredith E Coles1.   

Abstract

The present study examined whether the sex difference in depression could be accounted for within the framework of the hopelessness theory of depression. Specifically, we tested whether young adults' negative inferential styles mediated the sex difference in depressive symptoms or whether sex moderated the cognitive vulnerability-stress effects on depressive symptoms in a multi-wave longitudinal study. In doing so, we examined the different forms of negative inferential styles separately (causes, consequences, self-characteristics, composite, weakest link). Results did not support the mediation hypothesis. In terms of the moderation hypothesis, we found significant sex 9 inferential style 9 stress interactions predicting depressive symptoms across the follow-up, with the vulnerability-stress effects significant for men but not women. Among women, negative inferential styles and life events were independent predictors of depressive symptoms. In these moderation analyses, each of the inferential styles exhibited similar predictive validity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive vulnerability-stress; depression; sex differences

Year:  2009        PMID: 33907340      PMCID: PMC8074712          DOI: 10.1007/s10608-009-9241-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognit Ther Res        ISSN: 0147-5916


  32 in total

Review 1.  Development of gender differences in depression: an elaborated cognitive vulnerability-transactional stress theory.

Authors:  B L Hankin; L Y Abramson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Missing data: our view of the state of the art.

Authors:  Joseph L Schafer; John W Graham
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-06

3.  Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder.

Authors:  M M Weissman; R C Bland; G J Canino; C Faravelli; S Greenwald; H G Hwu; P R Joyce; E G Karam; C K Lee; J Lellouch; J P Lépine; S C Newman; M Rubio-Stipec; J E Wells; P J Wickramaratne; H Wittchen; E K Yeh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996 Jul 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Rethinking Rumination.

Authors:  Susan Nolen-Hoeksema; Blair E Wisco; Sonja Lyubomirsky
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-09

5.  Is life more difficult on Mars or Venus? A meta-analytic review of sex differences in major and minor life events.

Authors:  M C Davis; K A Matthews; E W Twamley
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1999

6.  Assessment of life stress in adolescents: self-report versus interview methods.

Authors:  S Duggal; S Malkoff-Schwartz; B Birmaher; B P Anderson; M K Matty; P R Houck; M Bailey-Orr; D E Williamson; E Frank
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.829

7.  Attributional style and depressive symptoms in adolescents: an examination of the role of various indicators of cognitive vulnerability.

Authors:  Esther Calvete; Lourdes Villardón; Ana Estévez
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2008-05-01

Review 8.  The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence.

Authors:  S Nolen-Hoeksema; J S Girgus
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Operationalizing cognitive vulnerability and stress from the perspective of the hopelessness theory: a multi-wave longitudinal study of children of affectively ill parents.

Authors:  John R Z Abela; Alexander McGirr
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2007-11

10.  A prospective study of the cognitive-stress model of depressive symptoms in adolescents.

Authors:  Matthew C Morris; Jeffrey A Ciesla; Judy Garber
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2008-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.