Literature DB >> 33906916

Performance of the Insulin-Only iLet Bionic Pancreas and the Bihormonal iLet Using Dasiglucagon in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes in a Home-Use Setting.

Luz E Castellanos1, Courtney A Balliro1, Jordan S Sherwood1, Rabab Jafri1, Mallory A Hillard1, Evelyn Greaux1, Rajendranath Selagamsetty2, Hui Zheng3, Firas H El-Khatib2, Edward R Damiano2,4, Steven J Russell5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33906916      PMCID: PMC8247518          DOI: 10.2337/dc20-1086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


× No keyword cloud information.
Reductions in blood glucose levels in people with diabetes are often achieved at the expense of increased hypoglycemia. A novel approach is to automatically deliver microdose glucagon when automation of insulin delivery alone is not sufficient to prevent hypoglycemia. The approach requires a bihormonal device and a stable form of glucagon or glucagon analog. The iLet bionic pancreas (Beta Bionics, Inc.) is a purpose-built, fully integrated device that receives a signal from a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and contains autonomous, lifelong learning, mathematical dosing algorithms, which are initialized only with the patient’s body weight (1). We evaluated the function and safety of the iLet in both its insulin-only configuration and its bihormonal configuration delivering dasiglucagon, a chemically stable glucagon analog (Zealand Pharma), in a home-use study in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This open-label, random-order, crossover, home-use trial (clinical trial reg. no. NCT03840278, ClinicalTrials.gov) was the first human study to test the bihormonal iLet configuration and the first multiday use of dasiglucagon in people with T1D (2). Ten participants used the insulin-only iLet for 7 days with insulin lispro (Eli Lilly) or aspart (Novo Nordisk), the bihormonal iLet for 7 days with dasiglucagon (4 mg/mL) and insulin lispro or aspart, or both, using the same glucose target (110 mg/dL), in random order. There were no restrictions on diet or exercise. The primary outcomes were prespecified iLet operational thresholds. The key secondary outcome was the median time with CGM glucose <54 mg/dL on days 2–7 (after one day of adaptation). All participants completed the study. Participants were 21–74 years old and had initial HbA1c levels of 5.7–10.6%. The iLet achieved a CGM capture rate of ≥80% during the insulin-only (90.7%) and bihormonal (88.7%) periods (Table 1). Drug dosing was available >95% of the time (99.7% and 99.1% for insulin in the insulin-only and bihormonal periods, respectively, and 99.7% for dasiglucagon). The ratio of delivered to attempted drug volume was 95–105% (100.3% and 99.9% for insulin in the insulin-only and bihormonal periods, respectively, and 102.0% for dasiglucagon).
Table 1

Summary of results

iLet operational performance targetsInsulin-only iLetBihormonal iLet
iLet operational outcomes
 CGM glucose readings captured, %≥8090.788.7
 Insulin delivery channel availability, %≥9599.799.1
 Ratio of cumulative delivered to attempted insulin volume, %95–105100.399.9
 Glucagon delivery channel availability, %≥9599.7
 Ratio of cumulative delivered to attempted glucagon volume, %95–105102.0
CGM glucose outcomesADA consensus targets (3)Insulin-only iLetBihormonal iLet
 Median % of time <54 mg/dL (IQR)<10.6 (0.2–1.1)0.2 (0–0.4)
 Median % of time <70 mg/dL (IQR)<44.0 (2.8–4.8)2.0 (1.3–3.3)
 Mean CGM glucose, mg/dL (SD)149 (13)139 (11)
 Mean % of time 70–180 mg/dL (SD)>7072 (8)79 (9)
 Mean % of time >180 mg/dL (SD)<2524 (8)18 (8)
 Mean % of time >250 mg/dL (SD)<56 (5)4 (4)
 Mean coefficient of variation, % (SD)<3638 (7)36 (7)
 Mean standard deviation, mg/dL (SD)57 (14)50 (13)
Nonglycemic outcomes
 Mean daily carbohydrates for prevention or treatment of hypoglycemia, g (SD)16 (13)18 (21)
 Dasiglucagon doses, mg/day (SD)0.35 (0.13)
 Insulin doses, unit/kg/day (SD)0.72 (0.23)0.60 (0.19)

As prespecified, iLet operational outcomes are reported for days 1–7, and CGM glucose outcomes and nonglycemic outcomes are reported for days 2–7. ADA, American Diabetes Association.

Summary of results As prespecified, iLet operational outcomes are reported for days 1–7, and CGM glucose outcomes and nonglycemic outcomes are reported for days 2–7. ADA, American Diabetes Association. The median percentage of time with CGM glucose <54 mg/dL was 0.6% (interquartile range [IQR] 0.2–1.1%) and 0.2% (IQR 0–0.4%) in the insulin-only and bihormonal periods, respectively (Table 1). The mean CGM glucose and time in range (70–180 mg/dL) were 149 ± 13 mg/dL and 72 ± 8%, respectively, in the insulin-only period, and 139 ± 11 mg/dL and 79 ± 9%, respectively, in the bihormonal period. The mean daily carbohydrates consumed to prevent or treat hypoglycemia were 16 ± 13 g and 18 ± 21 g in the insulin-only and bihormonal periods, respectively. The mean total daily dose (TDD) of dasiglucagon was 0.35 mg/day. All subjects used one prefilled dasiglucagon cartridge for the entire 7-day period. The average daily nausea scores on a 0–10 visual analog scale were 0.07 ± 0.12 cm and 0.47 ± 0.83 cm in the insulin-only and bihormonal periods, respectively. One participant reported an episode of vomiting during the bihormonal period. There were five instances of confirmed insulin leakage at the insulin cartridge connector (one in the bihormonal and four in the insulin-only period) that led to replacement of the insulin cartridge and connector. In participants who had confirmed leaks, the insulin TDD was 1.4–3.3-fold higher (mean TDD 1.3 vs. 0.6 units/kg/day) and the mean CGM glucose was 30–72 mg/dL higher (mean 197 vs. 139 mg/dL) on days with confirmed leaks than on days in the same arm without documented leaks. There were no occlusions or infusion site reactions. There was no severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis, and there were no serious or unexpected adverse events. Both iLet configurations met the prespecified operational performance targets. However, leaks occurred at the insulin cartridge connector. This was due to off-center piercing of the cartridge septum prior to insertion into the iLet that led to leakage through an enlarged hole in the septum after needle insertion. This observation led to changes in the cartridge replacement procedure and to design changes in the next-generation cartridge connector and iLet that will be used in the pivotal clinical trial. Despite insulin leakage, the mean CGM glucose and time in range were similar to those observed in previous trials, likely due to autonomous adaptation of insulin dosing by the iLet algorithms. The mean TDD of dasiglucagon was comparable to that of freshly reconstituted human glucagon observed in previous bionic pancreas trials (1). Time with glucose <54 mg/dL was <1% in both arms, consistent with the American Diabetes Association target for this metric (3). The use of a single, prefilled dasiglucagon cartridge for 7 days with no infusion site reactions or occlusions supports the practicality for this liquid formulation in clinical use. These results support testing the next-generation iLet with dasiglucagon in much larger and longer pivotal trials.
  3 in total

1.  Home use of a bihormonal bionic pancreas versus insulin pump therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes: a multicentre randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  Firas H El-Khatib; Courtney Balliro; Mallory A Hillard; Kendra L Magyar; Laya Ekhlaspour; Manasi Sinha; Debbie Mondesir; Aryan Esmaeili; Celia Hartigan; Michael J Thompson; Samir Malkani; J Paul Lock; David M Harlan; Paula Clinton; Eliana Frank; Darrell M Wilson; Daniel DeSalvo; Lisa Norlander; Trang Ly; Bruce A Buckingham; Jamie Diner; Milana Dezube; Laura A Young; April Goley; M Sue Kirkman; John B Buse; Hui Zheng; Rajendranath R Selagamsetty; Edward R Damiano; Steven J Russell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Characteristics of Dasiglucagon, a Novel Soluble and Stable Glucagon Analog.

Authors:  Ulrike Hövelmann; Britta Væver Bysted; Ulrik Mouritzen; Francesca Macchi; Daniela Lamers; Birgit Kronshage; Daniél Vega Møller; Tim Heise
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 3.  Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range.

Authors:  Tadej Battelino; Thomas Danne; Richard M Bergenstal; Stephanie A Amiel; Roy Beck; Torben Biester; Emanuele Bosi; Bruce A Buckingham; William T Cefalu; Kelly L Close; Claudio Cobelli; Eyal Dassau; J Hans DeVries; Kim C Donaghue; Klemen Dovc; Francis J Doyle; Satish Garg; George Grunberger; Simon Heller; Lutz Heinemann; Irl B Hirsch; Roman Hovorka; Weiping Jia; Olga Kordonouri; Boris Kovatchev; Aaron Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Brian Levine; Alexander Mayorov; Chantal Mathieu; Helen R Murphy; Revital Nimri; Kirsten Nørgaard; Christopher G Parkin; Eric Renard; David Rodbard; Banshi Saboo; Desmond Schatz; Keaton Stoner; Tatsuiko Urakami; Stuart A Weinzimer; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 19.112

  3 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in closed-loop insulin delivery.

Authors:  Julia Ware; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 8.694

2.  A Multicenter Randomized Trial Evaluating Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in the Bionic Pancreas in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Steven J Russell; Edward R Damiano; Firas H El-Khatib; Katrina J Ruedy; Courtney Balliro; Zoey Li; Peter Calhoun
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 7.337

Review 3.  New Developments in Glucagon Treatment for Hypoglycemia.

Authors:  LesleAnn Hayward Story; Leah M Wilson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 11.431

Review 4.  Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Systems: Past, Present, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Sophie Templer
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 5.  Current Status and Emerging Options for Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Rayhan A Lal
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 7.337

Review 6.  Dual-hormone artificial pancreas for management of type 1 diabetes: Recent progress and future directions.

Authors:  Marco Infante; David A Baidal; Michael R Rickels; Andrea Fabbri; Jay S Skyler; Rodolfo Alejandro; Camillo Ricordi
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.663

Review 7.  Current Advances of Artificial Pancreas Systems: A Comprehensive Review of the Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Sun Joon Moon; Inha Jung; Cheol-Young Park
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.376

Review 8.  Review of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems for Type 1 Diabetes and Associated Time in Range Outcomes.

Authors:  Armaan Nallicheri; Katherine M Mahoney; Hanna A Gutow; Natalie Bellini; Diana Isaacs
Journal:  touchREV Endocrinol       Date:  2022-05-20

9.  Dual-hormone artificial pancreas for glucose control in type 1 diabetes: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Baoqi Zeng; Hao Jia; Le Gao; Qingqing Yang; Kai Yu; Feng Sun
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.408

Review 10.  Fault Tolerant Strategies for Automated Insulin Delivery Considering the Human Component: Current and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Aleix Beneyto; B Wayne Bequette; Josep Vehi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.