Literature DB >> 3390668

Surgical treatment of colostomy complications.

T G Allen-Mersh1, J P Thomson.   

Abstract

One hundred and twenty-three patients (M:F, 0.9:1; mean age 62 years) underwent 156 operations between 1954 and 1984 for correction of late colostomy complications (stenosis 65 patients, prolapse 16 patients, paracolostomy hernia 42 patients). Sixty-three per cent of patients eventually had a good result but in some up to 5 operations were necessary. Local excision of scar tissue at the mucocutaneous junction was associated with a 61 per cent (43/71) success rate for relief of colostomy stenosis. Where local fixation failed to prevent recurrent colostomy prolapse (13/20, 65 per cent of local fixation operations), colectomy and ileostomy was the most effective second procedure (2/3, 67 per cent success rate). Where local repair of a paracolostomy hernia failed (15/32, 47 per cent of local operations), resiting of the stoma to the umbilicus or right side of the abdomen produced better results (3/7, 43 per cent success rate) than resiting to another trephine on the left side of the abdomen (2/14, 14 per cent success rate).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3390668     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800750507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  37 in total

1.  The continuing challenge of parastomal hernia: failure of a novel polypropylene mesh repair.

Authors:  P P Tekkis; H M Kocher; J G Payne
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  A simple technique for repair of distal limb prolapse of a loop colostomy.

Authors:  C Ono; T Iwama; K Kumamoto; H Ishida
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  [Stoma prolapse and stoma retraction].

Authors:  C Schleicher; N Senninger; T Vowinkel; C Anthoni
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Anastomosis or stoma for low rectal cancer?

Authors:  C Hall; S Rowley; J P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Lateral repair of parastomal hernia.

Authors:  S N Amin; N C Armitage; J F Abercrombie; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Late stomal complications.

Authors:  Syed G Husain; Thomas E Cataldo
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-02

7.  Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair.

Authors:  R O Craft; K L Huguet; E C McLemore; K L Harold
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Local repair of a trans-stomal ileocecal prolapse by stapler device.

Authors:  F Fleres; E Saladino; C Famulari; A Macrì
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-09-17

Review 9.  Avoidance and management of stomal complications.

Authors:  Michael Kwiatt; Michitaka Kawata
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06

10.  Reoperation for stoma-related complications.

Authors:  Justin T Kim; Ravin R Kumar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.