Literature DB >> 33906410

Towards quantifying the mass extinction debt of the Anthropocene.

Christopher Spalding1,2, Pincelli M Hull3.   

Abstract

To make sense of our present biodiversity crises, the modern rate of species extinctions is commonly compared to a benchmark, or 'background,' rate derived from the fossil record. These estimates are critical for bounding the scale of modern diversity loss, but are yet to fully account for the fundamental structure of extinction rates through time. Namely, a substantial fraction of extinctions within the fossil record occurs within relatively short-lived extinction pulses, and not during intervals characterized by background rates of extinction. Accordingly, it is more appropriate to compare the modern event to these pulses than to the long-term average rate. Unfortunately, neither the duration of extinction pulses in the geological record nor the ultimate magnitude of the extinction pulse today is resolved, making assessments of their relative sizes difficult. In addition, the common metric used to compare current and past extinction rates does not correct for large differences in observation duration. Here, we propose a new predictive metric that may be used to ascertain the ultimate extent of the ongoing extinction threat, building on the observation that extinction magnitude in the marine fossil record is correlated to the magnitude of sedimentary turnover. Thus, we propose that the ultimate number of species destined for extinction today can be predicted by way of a quantitative appraisal of humanity's modification of ecosystems as recorded in sediments-that is, by comparing our future rock record with that of the past. The ubiquity of habitat disruption worldwide suggests that a profound mass extinction debt exists today, but one that might yet be averted by preserving and restoring ecosystems and their geological traces.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropocene; debt; extinctions

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33906410      PMCID: PMC8080006          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  43 in total

1.  What was natural in the coastal oceans?

Authors:  J B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Survival without recovery after mass extinctions.

Authors:  David Jablonski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The future of biodiversity.

Authors:  S L Pimm; G J Russell; J L Gittleman; T M Brooks
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Impacts of speciation and extinction measured by an evolutionary decay clock.

Authors:  Jennifer F Hoyal Cuthill; Nicholas Guttenberg; Graham E Budd
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Defaunation in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Rodolfo Dirzo; Hillary S Young; Mauro Galetti; Gerardo Ceballos; Nick J B Isaac; Ben Collen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Temporal acuity and the rate and dynamics of mass extinctions.

Authors:  Douglas H Erwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The fossil record of the sixth extinction.

Authors:  Roy E Plotnick; Felisa A Smith; S Kathleen Lyons
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Near-complete extinction of native small mammal fauna 25 years after forest fragmentation.

Authors:  Luke Gibson; Antony J Lynam; Corey J A Bradshaw; Fangliang He; David P Bickford; David S Woodruff; Sara Bumrungsri; William F Laurance
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Dynamics of extinction debt across five taxonomic groups.

Authors:  John M Halley; Nikolaos Monokrousos; Antonios D Mazaris; William D Newmark; Despoina Vokou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Maximum rates of climate change are systematically underestimated in the geological record.

Authors:  David B Kemp; Kilian Eichenseer; Wolfgang Kiessling
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Why sequence all eukaryotes?

Authors:  Mark Blaxter; John M Archibald; Anna K Childers; Jonathan A Coddington; Keith A Crandall; Federica Di Palma; Richard Durbin; Scott V Edwards; Jennifer A M Graves; Kevin J Hackett; Neil Hall; Erich D Jarvis; Rebecca N Johnson; Elinor K Karlsson; W John Kress; Shigehiro Kuraku; Mara K N Lawniczak; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Jose V Lopez; Nancy A Moran; Gene E Robinson; Oliver A Ryder; Beth Shapiro; Pamela S Soltis; Tandy Warnow; Guojie Zhang; Harris A Lewin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.