Literature DB >> 33905823

Proprioceptive Acuity is Enhanced During Arm Movements Compared to When the Arm is Stationary: A Study of Young and Older Adults.

Christopher R Coffman1, Charles Capaday1, Warren G Darling2.   

Abstract

Proprioception in old age is thought to be poorer due to degeneration of the central (CNS) and peripheral nervous systems (PNS). We tested whether community-dwelling older adults (65-83 years) make larger proprioceptive errors than young adults (18-22 years) using a natural reaching task. Subjects moved the right arm to touch the index fingertip to the stationary or moving left index fingertip. The range of locations of the target index fingertip was large, sampling the natural workspace of the human arm. The target arm was moved actively by the subject or passively by the experimenter and reaching arm movements towards the target were made under visual guidance, or with vision blocked (proprioceptive guidance). Subjects did not know the direction or speed of upcoming target hand motion in the passive conditions. Mean 3D distance errors between the right and left index finger tips were small in both groups and only slightly larger when vision was blocked than when allowed, but averaged 2-5 mm larger in older than in younger adults in moving (p = 0.002) and stationary (p = 0.07) conditions, respectively. Variable errors were small and similar in the two groups (p > 0.35). Importantly, clearly larger errors were observed for reaching to the stationary than to the moving index fingertip in both groups, demonstrating that dynamic proprioceptive information during movement permits more accurate localization of the endpoint of the moving arm. This novel finding demonstrates the importance of dynamic proprioceptive information in movement guidance and bimanual coordination.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kinesthesia; motor control in elders; pointing movements; proprioception

Year:  2021        PMID: 33905823     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  1 in total

1.  Quantitatively assessing aging effects in rapid motor behaviours: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Richard Hugh Moulton; Karen Rudie; Sean P Dukelow; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.208

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.