Literature DB >> 33904997

The SHED Index: a tool for assessing a Sustainable HEalthy Diet.

Sigal Tepper1, Diklah Geva2, Danit R Shahar3, Alon Shepon4,5, Opher Mendelsohn6, Moria Golan7, Dorit Adler8, Rachel Golan3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Promoting sustainable diets through sustainable food choices is essential for achieving the sustainable development goals set by the United Nations. Establishing a practical tool that can measure and score sustainable and healthy eating is highly important.
METHODS: We established a 30-item questionnaire to evaluate sustainable-dietary consumption. Based on the literature and a multidisciplinary advisory panel, the questionnaire was computed by principal component analysis, yielding the Sustainable-HEalthy-Diet (SHED) Index. A rigorous multi-stage process included validation in training-verification sets, across recycling efforts, as an indicator of environmental commitment; and validation across the proportion of animal-protein consumption, as an indicator of adherence to a sustainable and healthy dietary-pattern. The EAT-Lancet reference-diet and the Mediterranean-Diet-score were used to investigate the construct validity of the SHED Index score. Reliability was assessed with a test-retest sample.
RESULTS: Three-hundred-forty-eight men and women, aged 20-45 years, completed both the SHED Index questionnaire and a validated Food-Frequency-Questionnaire. Increased dietary animal-protein intake was associated with a lower SHED Index total score (p < 0.001). Higher recycling efforts were associated with a higher total SHED Index score (p < 0.001). A linear correlation was found between the SHED Index score and food-groups of the Eat-Lancet-reference diet. A significant correlation was found between the Mediterranean-Diet-score and the SHED Index score (r = 0.575, p < 0.001). The SHED Index score revealed high reliability in test-retest, high validity in training and verification sets, and internal consistency.
CONCLUSION: We developed the SHED Index score, a simple, practical tool, for measuring healthy and sustainable individual-diets. The score reflects the nutritional, environmental and sociocultural aspects of sustainable diets; and provides a tangible tool to be used in intervention studies and in daily practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dietary patterns; Healthy eating; Sustainable nutrition

Year:  2021        PMID: 33904997     DOI: 10.1007/s00394-021-02554-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nutr        ISSN: 1436-6207            Impact factor:   5.614


  3 in total

Review 1.  Med Diet 4.0: the Mediterranean diet with four sustainable benefits.

Authors:  S Dernini; E M Berry; L Serra-Majem; C La Vecchia; R Capone; F X Medina; J Aranceta-Bartrina; R Belahsen; B Burlingame; G Calabrese; D Corella; L M Donini; D Lairon; A Meybeck; A G Pekcan; S Piscopo; A Yngve; A Trichopoulou
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  [Reconstruction of the vertical dimension following loss of the natural dentition].

Authors:  F Ascher
Journal:  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z       Date:  1973-01

3.  Environmental footprints of Mediterranean versus Western dietary patterns: beyond the health benefits of the Mediterranean diet.

Authors:  Sara Sáez-Almendros; Biel Obrador; Anna Bach-Faig; Lluis Serra-Majem
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 5.984

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Environmental Footprint Associated With the Mediterranean Diet, EAT-Lancet Diet, and the Sustainable Healthy Diet Index: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Sigal Tepper; Meidad Kissinger; Kerem Avital; Danit Rivkah Shahar
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Low Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Sustainable Reference Diet in the Brazilian Population: Findings from the National Dietary Survey 2017-2018.

Authors:  Dirce Maria Marchioni; Leandro Teixeira Cacau; Eduardo De Carli; Aline Martins de Carvalho; Maria Cristina Rulli
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 5.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.