Literature DB >> 33904779

Economic analysis of the use of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the surgical setting.

Jianying Zhang1, Wei Jiang1, Felipe Urdaneta2.   

Abstract

Aim: Compared with direct laryngoscopy (DL), video laryngoscopy (VL) offers clinical benefits in routine and difficult airways. The health economic benefit of VL versus DL for routine tracheal intubation remains unknown. Materials & methods: This analysis compared VL and DL health economic outcomes, including total inpatient costs, length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission and incidence of procedurally associated complications.
Results: Patients with VL had decreased inpatient cost (US$1144-5891 across eight major diagnostic categories [MDC]); >1-day LOS reduction in five MDC; reduced odds for postoperative ICU admission (0.04-0.68) and reduced odds of respiratory complications in three MDC (0.43-0.90).
Conclusion: Video laryngoscopy may lower total costs, reduce LOS and decrease the likelihood of postoperative ICU admission.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct laryngoscopy; health economic analysis; hospital cost; intensive care unit; length of stay; tracheal intubation; video laryngoscopy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33904779     DOI: 10.2217/cer-2021-0068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Eff Res        ISSN: 2042-6305            Impact factor:   1.744


  2 in total

Review 1.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Hansel; Andrew M Rogers; Sharon R Lewis; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  The golden era of videolaryngoscopy: costs we should consider.

Authors:  Geun Joo Choi
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-07-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.