| Literature DB >> 33904660 |
André Matos de Oliveira1, Fernando Mello Froes Fonseca1, Sabrina Thalita Reis1, Nayara Izabel Viana1, Edilamar Menezes Oliveira2, Luiz Osório Leiria3, Katia Ramos Moreira Leite1, William Carlos Nahas1, Miguel Srougi1, Alberto Azoubel Antunes1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of physical activity in functional and molecular bladder alterations in an obese and insulin-resistant murine model.Entities:
Keywords: bladder; nitric oxide; obesity; overactive bladder; physical activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33904660 PMCID: PMC8077148 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14792
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Morphometric characteristics of the groups of studied rats (results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation)
|
Group 1 PA + SD (n = 7) |
Group 2 PA + HFD (n = 7) |
Group 3 NoPA + SD (n = 7) |
Group 4 NoPA + HFD (n = 7) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight gain (g) | 213.89 (±13.77)bc | 209.84 (±27.40)de | 261.63 (±34.20) | 257.57 (±32.95) |
| Epididymal fat (g) | 14.06 (±4.04)bc | 15.26 (±4.53)de | 19.74 (±4.09) | 20.38 (±3.44) |
| Retroperitoneal fat (g) | 15.35 (±5.31)c | 16.62 (±6.04) | 18.23 (±3.23) | 21.58 (±4.53) |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 115.44 (±12.98) | 113.40 (±13.08) | 110.38 (±13.14) | 117.57 (±13.93) |
| Blood glucose (mg/dl) | 106.86 (±4.98)ac | 123.33 (±19.88)d | 104.86 (±5.67)f | 129.29 (±16.24) |
| Insulin (ng/ml) | 4.14 (±1.14)c | 4.87 (±2.24) | 5.14 (±0.78) | 6.05 (±1.79) |
| HOMA‐IR index | 1.09 (±0.37)c | 1.49 (±0.64) | 1.33 (±0.21)f | 1.95 (±0.73) |
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 63.5 (±3.93)a b | 54.95 (±7.08)d | 71.74 (±8.30)f | 61.34 (±6.98) |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 2.69 (±1.42) | 2.75 (±1.76) | 4.39 (±2.57) | 2.73 (±1.13) |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 46.53 (±3.83) | 38.58 (±8.16) | 45.08 (±10.02) | 45.19 (±8.27) |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 71.43 (±14.49)b | 68.08 (±18.49)d | 111.32 (±28.04)f | 67.11 (±10.70) |
Abbreviations: HFD, high‐fat diet; NoPA, no physical activity; PA, physical activity; SD, standard diet.
(a) p < 0.05 for the group 1 × 2 comparison; (b) p < 0.05 for the group 1 × 3 comparison; (c) p < 0.05 for the group 1 × 4 comparison; (d) p < 0.05 for the group 2 × 3 comparison; (e) p < 0.05 for the group 2 × 4 comparison; and (f) p < 0.05 for the group 3 × 4 comparison.
Urodynamic parameters of the groups of rats studied (results are expressed as the mean ±standard deviation)
|
Group 1 PA +SD (n = 4) |
Group 2 PA +HFD (n = 5) |
Group 3 NoPA +SD (n = 7) |
Group 4 NoPA +HFD (n = 5) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of micturitions (nmic) | 6.00 (±1.82)c | 10.80 (±4.81) | 8.43 (±3.55) | 13.60 (±4.21) |
| Intercontraction interval (ICI) | 228.92 (±77.84) | 184.80 (±93.63) | 185.34 (±56.38) | 132.18 (±42.03) |
| Threshold pressure (Pthres) (mmHg) | 9.00 (±1.24) | 8.93 (±1.12) | 8.00 (±1.03)f | 10.96 (±2.08) |
| Peak pressure (Pmax) (mmHg) | 25.94 (±3.85) | 31.06 (±3.78) | 28.53 (±1.77) | 29.40 (±6.12) |
| Postvoid pressure (PVP) (mmHg) | 5.08 (±1.23)c | 6.53 (±1.52) | 4.79 (±0.87)f | 8.06 (±2.24) |
| Capacity (Cap) (ml) | 0.91 (±0.41)ac | 0.37 (±0.14) | 0.59 (±0.22) | 0.29 (±0.18) |
| Compliance (Bcompl) (ml/mmHg) | 0.091 (±0.034)c | 0.039 (±0.14) | 0.073 (±0.036) | 0.027 (±0.014) |
Abbreviations: HFD, high‐fat diet; NoPA, no physical activity; PA, physical activity; SD, standard diet.
(a) p < 0.05 for the group 1 × 2 comparison; (b) p < 0.05 for the group 1 × 3 comparison; (c) p < 0.05 for the group 1 × 4 comparison; (d) p < 0.05 for the group 2 × 3 comparison; (e) p < 0.05 for the group 2 × 4 comparison; and (f) p < 0.05 for the group 3 × 4 comparison
FIGURE 1Ratio of relative gene expression for each rat in comparison with the mean of control group (baseline). Graph 1: No physical activity groups (baseline: group 3); Graph 2: standard diet groups (bseline: group 3); Graph 3: high‐fat diet groups (baseline: group 4); and Graph 4: “extreme” groups (baseline: group 4). Legend: NoPA: no physical activity; SD: standard diet; HFD: high‐fat diet; PA: physical activity; IRS1: insulin receptor substrate‐1; IRS2: insulin receptor substrate‐2; PI3K: phosphoinositide‐3‐kinase; AKT2: protein kinase B; NOS3: endothelial nitric oxide synthase
Relative gene expressions in comparison with NoPA fed a HFD (4) and NoPA fed a SD (3) (control), PA (1) and NoPA (3) (control) groups of rats fed a SD, PA (2) and NoPA (4) (control) groups of rats fed a HFD, PA fed a SD (1) NoPA rats fed a HFD (4) (control)
| Group 4 vs 3 | IRS1 | IRS2 | PI3K | AKT2 | NOS3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean |
|
|
|
|
|
| Median |
|
|
|
|
|
| Overexpression | 14.3% | 28.6% | 14.3% | 14.3% | 0 |
| Subexpression | 85.7% | 71.4% | 85.7% | 85.7% | 100% |
The level of expression of the target genes was obtained by the relative quantification and the levels of expression determined by the 2‐ △△ CT method. On the logarithmic graph, this method standardizes the expression of normal control as a baseline (represented by the number 1) and the relative expression of each RNA for each sample is sometimes shown as normal for more in cases of overexpression and for less in cases of underexpression. All reactions were performed in duplicate (in bold) (Livak & Schmittgen, 2001).
Abbreviations: HFD, high‐fat diet; NoPA, no physical activity; PA, physical activity; SD, standard diet.