| Literature DB >> 33904628 |
James Bowness1,2, Ourania Varsou3, Lloyd Turbitt4, David Burkett-St Laurent5.
Abstract
Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia involves visualizing sono-anatomy to guide needle insertion and the perineural injection of local anesthetic. Anatomical knowledge, and recognition of anatomical structures on ultrasound, is known to be imperfect amongst anesthesiologists. This investigation evaluates the performance of an assistive artificial intelligence (AI) system in aiding the identification of anatomical structures on ultrasound. Three independent experts in regional anesthesia reviewed 40 ultrasound scans of seven body regions. Unmodified ultrasound videos were presented side-by-side with AI-highlighted ultrasound videos. Experts rated the overall system performance, ascertained whether highlighting helped identify specific anatomical structures, and provided opinion on whether it would help confirm the correct ultrasound view to a less experienced practitioner. Two hundred and seventy-five assessments were performed (five videos contained inadequate views); mean highlighting scores ranged from 7.87-8.69 (out of 10). The Kruskal-Wallis H-test showed a statistically significant difference in the overall performance rating (χ2 [6] = 36.719, asymptotic p < 0.001); regions containing a prominent vascular landmark ranked most highly. AI-highlighting was helpful in identifying specific anatomical structures in 1330/1334 cases (99.7%) and for confirming the correct ultrasound view in 273/275 scans (99.3%). These data demonstrate the clinical utility of an assistive AI system in aiding the identification of anatomical structures on ultrasound during ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Whilst further evaluation must follow, such technology may present an opportunity to enhance clinical practice and energize the important field of clinical anatomy amongst clinicians. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.Keywords: Sono-anatomy; artificial intelligence; regional anesthesia; ultrasound
Year: 2021 PMID: 33904628 DOI: 10.1002/ca.23742
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Anat ISSN: 0897-3806 Impact factor: 2.414