Aaron N Winn1,2,3, Aaron P Mitchell4, Nicole Fergestrom5,6, Joan M Neuner7,5,6, Justin G Trogdon8,9. 1. Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, School of Pharmacy, Milwaukee, WI, USA. awinn@mcw.edu. 2. Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. awinn@mcw.edu. 3. Center for the Advancing Population Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. awinn@mcw.edu. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Center for the Advancing Population Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 6. Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 7. Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 8. Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 9. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Financial relationships between physicians and the pharmaceutical and medical device industries are common, but the factors associated with physicians receiving payments are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of physicians' professional networks' characteristics on the receipt of payments among physicians. DESIGN: Network analysis of cross-sectional data PARTICIPANTS: US physicians who shared Medicare patients with other physicians in 2015 (N=357,813). EXPOSURE (INTERVENTION): Proportion of a physician's professional network that received industry payments and other network characteristics including number of physician connections, how central the physician is within the network, and the tightness of the referral network in which a physician is located. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk of receiving industry payments. We used modified Poisson regression to control for confounding by gender, time since graduation, practice size, and practice setting (teaching hospital vs. not). We included dummy variables for specialty and hospital referral region level. KEY RESULTS: The proportion of a physician's peers in their professional network that received payments was strongly associated with receipt of pharmaceutical or device industry payments by the physician (top vs bottom quartile aRR=1.28, 95%CI=1.25-1.31). Physician's centrality within a network had a small positive effect on receiving payment (top vs bottom quartile aRR=1.02, 95%CI=1.01-1.04). Network density also had a small negative association with receipt of payment (top vs bottom quartile aRR=0.97, 95%CI=0.96-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Network characteristics, particularly the receipt of payments among physicians one shares patients with, are associated with whether a physician receives payments. This finding has implications for institutional regulation of industry payments to physicians and demonstrates how institutional policy may impact not only the physicians within the institution but also physicians outside of the institution.
BACKGROUND: Financial relationships between physicians and the pharmaceutical and medical device industries are common, but the factors associated with physicians receiving payments are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of physicians' professional networks' characteristics on the receipt of payments among physicians. DESIGN: Network analysis of cross-sectional data PARTICIPANTS: US physicians who shared Medicare patients with other physicians in 2015 (N=357,813). EXPOSURE (INTERVENTION): Proportion of a physician's professional network that received industry payments and other network characteristics including number of physician connections, how central the physician is within the network, and the tightness of the referral network in which a physician is located. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk of receiving industry payments. We used modified Poisson regression to control for confounding by gender, time since graduation, practice size, and practice setting (teaching hospital vs. not). We included dummy variables for specialty and hospital referral region level. KEY RESULTS: The proportion of a physician's peers in their professional network that received payments was strongly associated with receipt of pharmaceutical or device industry payments by the physician (top vs bottom quartile aRR=1.28, 95%CI=1.25-1.31). Physician's centrality within a network had a small positive effect on receiving payment (top vs bottom quartile aRR=1.02, 95%CI=1.01-1.04). Network density also had a small negative association with receipt of payment (top vs bottom quartile aRR=0.97, 95%CI=0.96-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Network characteristics, particularly the receipt of payments among physicians one shares patients with, are associated with whether a physician receives payments. This finding has implications for institutional regulation of industry payments to physicians and demonstrates how institutional policy may impact not only the physicians within the institution but also physicians outside of the institution.
Authors: Colette DeJong; Thomas Aguilar; Chien-Wen Tseng; Grace A Lin; W John Boscardin; R Adams Dudley Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Michael L Barnett; Bruce E Landon; A James O'Malley; Nancy L Keating; Nicholas A Christakis Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Bruce E Landon; Nancy L Keating; Michael L Barnett; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Sudeshna Paul; A James O'Malley; Thomas Keegan; Nicholas A Christakis Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 56.272