| Literature DB >> 33903244 |
Tarciso A F Velho1,2, Peter V Lovell3, Samantha R Friedrich3, Christopher R Olson3, Joshua Miles4, Paul A Mueller4, Hagai Tavori4, Sergio Fazio4, Carlos Lois2, Claudio V Mello5.
Abstract
The low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) is key to cellular cholesterol uptake and is also the main receptor for the vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSV G). Here we show that in songbirds LDLR is highly divergent and lacks domains critical for ligand binding and cellular trafficking, inconsistent with universal structure conservation and function across vertebrates. Linked to the LDLR functional domain loss, zebra finches show inefficient infectivity by lentiviruses (LVs) pseudotyped with VSV G, which can be rescued by the expression of human LDLR. Finches also show an atypical plasma lipid distribution that relies largely on high-density lipoprotein (HDL). These findings provide insights into the genetics and evolution of viral infectivity and cholesterol transport mechanisms in vertebrates.Entities:
Keywords: LDLR; VSG G; cholesterol; lentivirus; viral transduction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33903244 PMCID: PMC8106303 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2025167118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.LDLR gene divergence in songbirds. (A) Simplified cladogram of vertebrates; LDLR is present in all groups but highly divergent in songbirds (red). (B) LDLR gene synteny depicts broad conservation across vertebrates, with rearrangements or apparent gene losses (KANK2, DOCK6, and TSPAN16) downstream of LDLR in sauropsids. Chromosomal placement is undefined for most species, and synteny in chicken (*) derives from Pacbio p-reads (). (C) Diagram of LDLR gene and predicted protein in humans (Top) and zebra finch (Bottom). Dashed lines show exon correspondence to specific protein domains; arrows indicate human exons missing in songbirds; dark-colored regions indicate cysteine-rich (CR) (violet) and EGF-like (red) human protein domains missing in zebra finches; and asterisks indicate protein domains critical for VSV G binding. Relative sizes of exons (Upper lines) and protein domains (Lower lines), but not of introns, were preserved. (D) Predicted LDLR protein domains show conservation across vertebrates except in songbirds (e.g., Swainson’s thrush and New Caledonian crow; zebra finches in C) where CRs 1 and 2 and one EGF-like domain are missing and the protein is shorter. We note the unique lack of the downstream EGF-like domain in kakapo. Color codes and relative scales for protein domains are as in C. sp, signal peptide; EGF, epidermal growth factor-like repeat; O-Link, O-linked glycosylation domain; TMD, transmembrane domain.
Fig. 2.LDLR-related functions in birds. (A) VSV G LV infectivity is higher in chicken embryos and cultured embryonic fibroblasts (Bottom) compared to zebra finches (Top). (B) Cultured zebra finch cells expressing hLDLR (Right) show higher infectivity by VSV G LV-expressing NLS-RFP (red signal) compared to wild-type cells (Left). Same field for green and red channels, Inset at Bottom Right shows hLDLR+ cells expressing NLS-RFP (arrow), hLDLR, and NLS-RFP constructs shown at Top Right and Bottom Left, respectively. (C) Quantification of the experiment in B shows increased cell infectivity in zebra finches but not in chicken (means ± SEM, *P = 0.0017). (D) Comparison of serum cholesterol profiles for zebra finch (blue) and human (black) show absence of an LDL-like fraction and an almost exclusive association of cholesterol with an HDL-like fraction in finch. (E and F) Serum cholesterol and triglyceride profiles for sated and fasting adult male zebra finches (E) and roosters (F). (Inset in F) Comparison of molar ratio of serum triglycerides to cholesterol in HDL shows higher ratio in zebra finches (F) than roosters (R) (means ± SEM; t test, P = 0.0012). NLS, nuclear localization signal; Chol., cholesterol; Trig., triglycerides.
Zebra finch serum cholesterol is in ApoA1-containing fractions
| Gel band | Uniprot accession | Gene name | Protein name | No. unique peptides | No. PSMs | MW (kDa) |
| 01 | H0ZS92 | A2M | Alpha-2-macroglobulin | 25 | 53 | 164.4 |
| 01 | H0ZS79 | A2M | Alpha-2-macroglobulin | 8 | 30 | 158.6 |
| 01 | H0Z0Q3 | ACTG1 | Actin, cytoplasmic | 9 | 10 | 41.8 |
| 02 | H0Z885 | TF | Ovotransferrin | 39 | 144 | 77.4 |
| 02 | H0YTL4 | ALB | Albumin | 23 | 47 | 68.1 |
| 02 | H0Z0Q3 | ACTG1 | Actin, cytoplasmic | 3 | 14 | 41.8 |
| 03 | H0YTL4 | ALB | Albumin | 53 | 329 | 68.1 |
| 03 | H0Z885 | TF | Ovotransferrin | 10 | 12 | 77.4 |
| 03 | H0ZP14 | c4 | Complement C4 | 7 | 8 | 188.4 |
| 04 | H0YTL4 | ALB | Albumin | 13 | 28 | 68.1 |
| 04 | H0YRF2 | GPX1 | Glutathione peroxidase 1 | 4 | 11 | 13.8 |
Protein content of SDS-PAGE-excised bands determined by mass spectrometry demonstrates the presence of ApoA1 in HDL-like and lack of ApoB or other detectable apolipoproteins in other fractions. Gel bands 01 and 02 to 04 derive respectively from finch serum fractions equivalent to 21 to 25 and 29 to 35 in Fig. 2. Only the three main protein components per gel band are listed. Boldface indicates the HDL-fraction defining component.