Xue Zhou1,2, Márcio F A Leite3, Zhenqing Zhang4, Lei Tian2, Jingjing Chang2,5, Lina Ma2,5, Xiujun Li2, Johannes A van Veen2,3, Chunjie Tian6, Eiko E Kuramae7,8. 1. College of Resources and Environment, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China. 2. Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, China. 3. Department of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology NIOO-KNAW, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 4. Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, China. 5. University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. 6. Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, China. tiancj@neigae.ac.cn. 7. Department of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology NIOO-KNAW, Wageningen, the Netherlands. e.kuramae@nioo.knaw.nl. 8. Ecology and biodiversity, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. e.kuramae@nioo.knaw.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The soil microbiome drives soil ecosystem function, and soil microbial functionality is directly linked to interactions between microbes and the soil environment. However, the context-dependent interactions in the soil microbiome remain largely unknown. RESULTS: Using latent variable models (LVMs), we disentangle the biotic and abiotic interactions of soil bacteria, fungi and environmental factors using the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau soil ecosystem as a model. Our results show that soil bacteria and fungi not only interact with each other but also shift from competition to facilitation or vice versa depending on environmental variation; that is, the nature of their interactions is context-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, elevation is the environmental gradient that most promotes facilitative interactions among microbes but is not a major driver of soil microbial community composition, as evidenced by variance partitioning. The larger the tolerance of a microbe to a specific environmental gradient, the lesser likely it is to interact with other soil microbes, which suggests that facilitation does not necessarily lead to niche expansion.
class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: The class="Chemical">n class="Species">soil microbiome drives soil ecosystem function, and soil microbial functionality is directly linked to interactions between microbes and the soil environment. However, the context-dependent interactions in the soil microbiome remain largely unknown. RESULTS: Using latent variable models (LVMs), we disentangle the biotic and abiotic interactions of soil bacteria, fungi and environmental factors using the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau soil ecosystem as a model. Our results show that soil bacteria and fungi not only interact with each other but also shift from competition to facilitation or vice versa depending on environmental variation; that is, the nature of their interactions is context-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, elevation is the environmental gradient that most promotes facilitative interactions among microbes but is not a major driver of soil microbial community composition, as evidenced by variance partitioning. The larger the tolerance of a microbe to a specific environmental gradient, the lesser likely it is to interact with other soil microbes, which suggests that facilitation does not necessarily lead to niche expansion.
Authors: David I Warton; F Guillaume Blanchet; Robert B O'Hara; Otso Ovaskainen; Sara Taskinen; Steven C Walker; Francis K C Hui Journal: Trends Ecol Evol Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 17.712
Authors: Jason D Hoeksema; V Bala Chaudhary; Catherine A Gehring; Nancy Collins Johnson; Justine Karst; Roger T Koide; Anne Pringle; Catherine Zabinski; James D Bever; John C Moore; Gail W T Wilson; John N Klironomos; James Umbanhowar Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: Noah Fierer; Christy M McCain; Patrick Meir; Michael Zimmermann; Joshua M Rapp; Miles R Silman; Rob Knight Journal: Ecology Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 5.499
Authors: Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; Peter B Reich; Amit N Khachane; Colin D Campbell; Nadine Thomas; Thomas E Freitag; Waleed Abu Al-Soud; Søren Sørensen; Richard D Bardgett; Brajesh K Singh Journal: Environ Microbiol Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 5.491
Authors: Björn Hoppe; Tiemo Kahl; Peter Karasch; Tesfaye Wubet; Jürgen Bauhus; François Buscot; Dirk Krüger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Adrian Ho; Roey Angel; Annelies J Veraart; Anne Daebeler; Zhongjun Jia; Sang Yoon Kim; Frederiek-Maarten Kerckhof; Nico Boon; Paul L E Bodelier Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 5.640