Bao Su1, Jieliang Shen1, Xiaoji Luo1, Zhengxue Quan1, Dianming Jiang2, Xiaohua Peng3, Ke Tang4. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1st Youyi Road, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No 1 Shuanghu Road, Chongqing, 401120, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Rehabilitation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1st Youyi Road, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China. pengxiaohua@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn. 4. Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1st Youyi Road, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China. spinelife@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical efficacy of posterior LFF for cervical OPLL with radicular pain of upper limbs METHODS: Between January 2014 and January 2018, 48 OPLL patients with radicular pain symptoms of upper limbs who underwent a one-stage posterior laminectomy and instrumented fusion with/without foraminotomy were reviewed retrospectively and divided into two groups: LF group (laminectomy with instrumented fusion without foraminotomy) and LFF group (laminectomy with instrumented fusion and foraminotomy). Clinical data were assessed and compared between the two groups. The radicular pain of upper limbs and neck was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). The neurological function was evaluated with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale. Changes of sagittal alignment were investigated by postoperative plain x-ray or computed tomography (CT). Moreover, the decompression of the spinal cord was evaluated based on postoperative MRI. RESULTS: All the 48 patients were followed up for 24-42 months with an average follow-up time of 31.1±5.3 months. A total of 56 cervical intervertebral foramens were enlarged in 48 patients, including 40 cases (83.3%) with 1 intervertebral foramen enlargement and 8 cases (16.7%) with 2 intervertebral foramen enlargements. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage amount, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, JOA recovery rates, VAS scores for neck pain, and ASIA grade between two groups. The mean operative time was shorter in the LF group compared with the LFF group. The VAS score for arm pain was significantly lower while the surgical duration was longer in group B. No statistical difference was observed between the two groups in terms of C2-C7 SVA, cervical lordosis, focal angulation at the foraminotomy segment, and local spinal cord angle. Compared with the LF group, there was no segmental kyphosis or instability where the additional posterior foraminotomy was performed in the LFF group. CONCLUSIONS: One-stage posterior LFF can achieve satisfied clinical efficacy in improving neurological function and relieving the radicular pain of the upper limbs for OPLL patients with radiculopathy symptoms.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical efficacy of posterior LFF for cervical OPLL with radicular pain of upper limbs METHODS: Between January 2014 and January 2018, 48 OPLLpatients with radicular pain symptoms of upper limbs who underwent a one-stage posterior laminectomy and instrumented fusion with/without foraminotomy were reviewed retrospectively and divided into two groups: LF group (laminectomy with instrumented fusion without foraminotomy) and LFF group (laminectomy with instrumented fusion and foraminotomy). Clinical data were assessed and compared between the two groups. The radicular pain of upper limbs and neck was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). The neurological function was evaluated with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale. Changes of sagittal alignment were investigated by postoperative plain x-ray or computed tomography (CT). Moreover, the decompression of the spinal cord was evaluated based on postoperative MRI. RESULTS: All the 48 patients were followed up for 24-42 months with an average follow-up time of 31.1±5.3 months. A total of 56 cervical intervertebral foramens were enlarged in 48 patients, including 40 cases (83.3%) with 1 intervertebral foramen enlargement and 8 cases (16.7%) with 2 intervertebral foramen enlargements. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage amount, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, JOA recovery rates, VAS scores for neck pain, and ASIA grade between two groups. The mean operative time was shorter in the LF group compared with the LFF group. The VAS score for arm pain was significantly lower while the surgical duration was longer in group B. No statistical difference was observed between the two groups in terms of C2-C7 SVA, cervical lordosis, focal angulation at the foraminotomy segment, and local spinal cord angle. Compared with the LF group, there was no segmental kyphosis or instability where the additional posterior foraminotomy was performed in the LFF group. CONCLUSIONS: One-stage posterior LFF can achieve satisfied clinical efficacy in improving neurological function and relieving the radicular pain of the upper limbs for OPLLpatients with radiculopathy symptoms.
Authors: Christian D Cerecedo-Lopez; Ian Tafel; Asad M Lak; John Chi; Yi Lu; Michael Groff; Hasan A Zaidi Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2019-12-26 Impact factor: 1.961