Katarzyna Stelmach1, Alicja Macko-Podgórni1, Charlotte Allender2, Dariusz Grzebelus3. 1. Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. 29 Listopada 54, 31-425, Kraków, Poland. 2. School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK. 3. Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. 29 Listopada 54, 31-425, Kraków, Poland. d.grzebelus@urk.edu.pl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Carrot is a crop with a wide range of phenotypic and molecular diversity. Within cultivated carrots, the western gene pool comprises types characterized by different storage root morphology. First western carrot cultivars originated from broad-based populations. It was followed by intercrosses among plants representing early open-pollinated cultivars, combined with mass phenotypic selection for traits of interest. Selective breeding improved root uniformity and led to the development of a range of cultivars differing in root shape and size. Based on the root shape and the market use of cultivars, a dozen of market types have been distinguished. Despite their apparent phenotypic variability, several studies have suggested that western cultivated carrot germplasm was genetically non-structured. RESULTS: Ninety-three DcS-ILP markers and 2354 SNP markers were used to evaluate the structure of genetic diversity in the collection of 78 western type open-pollinated carrot cultivars, each represented by five plants. The mean percentage of polymorphic loci segregating within a cultivar varied from 31.18 to 89.25% for DcS-ILP markers and from 45.11 to 91.29% for SNP markers, revealing high levels of intra-cultivar heterogeneity, in contrast to its apparent phenotypic stability. Average inbreeding coefficient for all cultivars was negative for both DcS-ILP and SNP, whereas the overall genetic differentiation across all market classes, as measured by FST, was comparable for both marker systems. For DcS-ILPs 90-92% of total genetic variation could be attributed to the differences within the inferred clusters, whereas for SNPs the values ranged between 91 to 93%. Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components enabled the separation of eight groups cultivars depending mostly on their market type affiliation. Three groups of cultivars, i.e. Amsterdam, Chantenay and Imperator, were characterized by high homogeneity regardless of the marker system used for genotyping. CONCLUSIONS: Both marker systems used in the study enabled detection of substantial variation among carrot plants of different market types, therefore can be used in germplasm characterization and analysis of genome relationships. The presented results likely reveal the actual genetic diversity structure within the western carrot gene pool and point at possible discrepancies within the cultivars' passport data.
BACKGROUND:Carrot is a crop with a wide range of phenotypic and molecular diversity. Within cultivated carrots, the western gene pool comprises types characterized by different storage root morphology. First western carrot cultivars originated from broad-based populations. It was followed by intercrosses among plants representing early open-pollinated cultivars, combined with mass phenotypic selection for traits of interest. Selective breeding improved root uniformity and led to the development of a range of cultivars differing in root shape and size. Based on the root shape and the market use of cultivars, a dozen of market types have been distinguished. Despite their apparent phenotypic variability, several studies have suggested that western cultivated carrot germplasm was genetically non-structured. RESULTS: Ninety-three DcS-ILP markers and 2354 SNP markers were used to evaluate the structure of genetic diversity in the collection of 78 western type open-pollinated carrot cultivars, each represented by five plants. The mean percentage of polymorphic loci segregating within a cultivar varied from 31.18 to 89.25% for DcS-ILP markers and from 45.11 to 91.29% for SNP markers, revealing high levels of intra-cultivar heterogeneity, in contrast to its apparent phenotypic stability. Average inbreeding coefficient for all cultivars was negative for both DcS-ILP and SNP, whereas the overall genetic differentiation across all market classes, as measured by FST, was comparable for both marker systems. For DcS-ILPs 90-92% of total genetic variation could be attributed to the differences within the inferred clusters, whereas for SNPs the values ranged between 91 to 93%. Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components enabled the separation of eight groups cultivars depending mostly on their market type affiliation. Three groups of cultivars, i.e. Amsterdam, Chantenay and Imperator, were characterized by high homogeneity regardless of the marker system used for genotyping. CONCLUSIONS: Both marker systems used in the study enabled detection of substantial variation among carrot plants of different market types, therefore can be used in germplasm characterization and analysis of genome relationships. The presented results likely reveal the actual genetic diversity structure within the western carrot gene pool and point at possible discrepancies within the cultivars' passport data.
Entities:
Keywords:
DAPC; Daucus carota; DcSto; Genetic diversity; Market classes; Population structure; Root shape; SNP
Authors: Peter J Bradbury; Zhiwu Zhang; Dallas E Kroon; Terry M Casstevens; Yogesh Ramdoss; Edward S Buckler Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2007-06-22 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Shelby L Ellison; Claire H Luby; Keo E Corak; Kevin M Coe; Douglas Senalik; Massimo Iorizzo; Irwin L Goldman; Philipp W Simon; Julie C Dawson Journal: Genetics Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Massimo Iorizzo; Douglas A Senalik; Shelby L Ellison; Dariusz Grzebelus; Pablo F Cavagnaro; Charlotte Allender; Johanne Brunet; David M Spooner; Allen Van Deynze; Philipp W Simon Journal: Am J Bot Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 3.844
Authors: Carlos I Arbizu; Shelby L Ellison; Douglas Senalik; Philipp W Simon; David M Spooner Journal: BMC Evol Biol Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 3.260
Authors: Dariusz Grzebelus; Massimo Iorizzo; Douglas Senalik; Shelby Ellison; Pablo Cavagnaro; Alicja Macko-Podgorni; Kasia Heller-Uszynska; Andrzej Kilian; Thomas Nothnagel; Charlotte Allender; Philipp W Simon; Rafal Baranski Journal: Mol Breed Date: 2013-10-26 Impact factor: 2.589
Authors: Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Terry M Casstevens; Fei Lu; James Harriman; Robert J Elshire; Qi Sun; Edward S Buckler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: William R Rolling; Douglas Senalik; Massimo Iorizzo; Shelby Ellison; Allen Van Deynze; Philipp W Simon Journal: Database (Oxford) Date: 2022-09-07 Impact factor: 4.462
Authors: Andrés G Rolhauser; Emma Windfeld; Solveig Hanson; Hannah Wittman; Chris Thoreau; Alexandra Lyon; Marney E Isaac Journal: New Phytol Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 10.323