Literature DB >> 33902365

Chronotype and risk of post-menopausal endometrial cancer in the California Teachers Study.

Julie Von Behren1, Susan Hurley1, Debbie Goldberg1, Jessica Clague DeHart2, Sophia S Wang3, Peggy Reynolds1.   

Abstract

Working at night causes circadian disruption and it has been classified as a probable carcinogen. An evening chronotype, or preference for late day activity, has been shown to increase risk for several adverse health effects, such as metabolic disorders and recently, breast cancer. To further explore this emerging area of interest, we examined the association between endometrial cancer (EC) risk, another common cancer in women, and chronotype. The women in this study were members of the California Teachers Study cohort, which was established in 1995. Chronotype was reported on a subsequent questionnaire (Q5), administered in 2012-2013. The women included in this analysis were under age 90 years, were post-menopausal at Q5, and had no hysterectomy. The cancer cases, identified through linkages to the California Cancer Registry, were diagnosed between 1996 and 2014. We used unconditional logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the associations between chronotype and EC diagnosis. There were 437 EC cases and 26,753 cancer-free controls included in this analysis. Controls were more likely to classify themselves as current morning chronotypes than were cases (39% and 34%, respectively). Compared to morning types, women who were definite evening types had a statistically significantly elevated OR of 1.44 (95% CI 1.09-1.91). This association was more pronounced among obese women as compared to non-obese women. For evening type compared to morning type, the OR among obese women was 2.01 (95% CI 1.23, 3.29) while the OR for non-obese women was 1.12 (95% CI 0.77, 1.63). To our knowledge, the association between EC risk and evening chronotype has not been previously reported, but is consistent with the small body of literature which suggests increased breast cancer risks among evening chronotypes. Because this study was based on a retrospective analysis in a cohort of mostly white female teachers in California, further analysis of chronotype as a potential EC risk factor should be considered in other cohorts and in prospective analyses in order to further explore this relationship.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronotype; case-control; circadian disruption; circadian rhythm; endometrial cancer risk

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33902365      PMCID: PMC9172273          DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2021.1912073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   3.749


  54 in total

1.  High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States).

Authors:  Leslie Bernstein; Mark Allen; Hoda Anton-Culver; Dennis Deapen; Pamela L Horn-Ross; David Peel; Richard Pinder; Peggy Reynolds; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Dee West; William Wright; Al Ziogas; Ronald K Ross
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 2.  Melatonin, energy metabolism, and obesity: a review.

Authors:  J Cipolla-Neto; F G Amaral; S C Afeche; D X Tan; R J Reiter
Journal:  J Pineal Res       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 13.007

3.  Painting, firefighting, and shiftwork.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  2010

4.  Hypotheses for mechanisms linking shiftwork and cancer.

Authors:  L Fritschi; D C Glass; J S Heyworth; K Aronson; J Girschik; T Boyle; A Grundy; T C Erren
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Sleep duration and endometrial cancer risk.

Authors:  Susan R Sturgeon; Nicole Luisi; Raji Balasubramanian; Katherine W Reeves
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 6.  Endometrial cancer: a review and current management strategies: part I.

Authors:  William M Burke; James Orr; Mario Leitao; Emery Salom; Paola Gehrig; Alexander B Olawaiye; Molly Brewer; Dave Boruta; Jeannine Villella; Jeanine Villella; Tom Herzog; Fadi Abu Shahin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin levels and their correlations with lifestyle factors and steroid hormone levels.

Authors:  Eva S Schernhammer; Candyce H Kroenke; Mitch Dowsett; Elizabeth Folkerd; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  J Pineal Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 13.007

8.  The relationship between breakfast skipping, chronotype, and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Sirimon Reutrakul; Megan M Hood; Stephanie J Crowley; Mary K Morgan; Marsha Teodori; Kristen L Knutson
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Chronotype and breast cancer risk in a cohort of US nurses.

Authors:  Cody Ramin; Elizabeth E Devore; Jeffrey Pierre-Paul; Jeanne F Duffy; Susan E Hankinson; Eva S Schernhammer
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Investigating causal relations between sleep traits and risk of breast cancer in women: mendelian randomisation study.

Authors:  Rebecca C Richmond; Emma L Anderson; Hassan S Dashti; Samuel E Jones; Jacqueline M Lane; Linn Beate Strand; Ben Brumpton; Martin K Rutter; Andrew R Wood; Kurt Straif; Caroline L Relton; Marcus Munafò; Timothy M Frayling; Richard M Martin; Richa Saxena; Michael N Weedon; Debbie A Lawlor; George Davey Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-06-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  Chronotype: what role in the context of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors?

Authors:  Luigi Barrea; Giovanna Muscogiuri; Gabriella Pugliese; Roberta Modica; Daniela Laudisio; Sara Aprano; Antongiulio Faggiano; Annamaria Colao; Silvia Savastano
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 5.531

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.