| Literature DB >> 33902318 |
Dao Thi Anh Nguyen1,2, Sharda Prasad Awasthi1,3, Phuong Hoai Hoang2, Phuc Do Nguyen2, Hassan Jayedul1,4, Noritoshi Hatanaka1,3, Atsushi Hinenoya1,3, Chinh Van Dang2, Shah M Faruque5, Shinji Yamasaki1,3.
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the prevalence, serovar distribution, and antimicrobial resistance pattern of Salmonella isolates from vegetable, fruit, and water samples in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Salmonella was detected in 75% (30/40), 57.1% (12/21), 17.5% (28/160), and 2.5% (1/40) of river water, irrigation water, vegetable, and ice water samples, respectively. However, no Salmonella was isolated from 160 fruit and 40 tap water samples examined. A total of 102 isolates obtained from 71 samples belonged to 34 different serovars, of which Salmonella Rissen was the most prevalent, followed by Salmonella London, Salmonella Hvittingfoss, and Salmonella Weltevreden. Certain Salmonella serovars such as Newport, Rissen, and Weltevreden were isolated from both vegetable and water samples. Antimicrobial resistance was most commonly observed against tetracycline (35.3%), followed by chloramphenicol (34.3%), ampicillin (31.4%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (23.5%), and nalidixic acid (10.8%). Of 102 isolates analyzed, 52 (51%) showed resistance to at least 1 antimicrobial class whereas 27 (26.5%) showed multidrug resistant (MDR) phenotype, being resistant to at least three different classes of antimicrobials. Determination of the presence and type of β-lactamase genes showed the cooccurrence of blaTEM-1 and blaCMY-2 in one Salmonella Agona isolate from a river water sample. Taken together, these data indicated that both environmental water and vegetables were contaminated with Salmonella, including MDR strains, and that environmental water used in irrigation might have been the source of Salmonella contamination in the vegetables.Entities:
Keywords: Salmonella; Vietnam; blaCMY-2, vegetable; environmental water; extended-spectrum β-lactamase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33902318 DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2020.2891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foodborne Pathog Dis ISSN: 1535-3141 Impact factor: 3.171