Literature DB >> 33901889

Influence of polymer additives on gas-phase emissions from 3D printer filaments.

Phillip M Potter1, Souhail R Al-Abed2, Farhana Hasan3, Slawomir M Lomnicki3.   

Abstract

A collection of six commercially available, 3D printer filaments were analyzed with respect to their gas-phase emissions, specifically volatile organic compounds (VOCs), during simulated fused filament fabrication (FFF). Filaments were chosen because they were advertised to contain metal particles or carbon nanotubes. During experimentation, some were found to contain other non-advertised additives that greatly influenced gas-phase emissions. Three polylactic acid (PLA) filaments containing either copper, bronze, or stainless steel particles were studied along in addition to three carbon nanotube (CNT) filaments made from PLA, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS), and polycarbonate (PC). The metal-additive PLA filaments were found to emit primarily lactide, acetaldehyde, and 1-chlorododecane. The presence of metal particles in the PLA is a possible cause of the increased total emissions, which were higher than any other PLA filament reported in the literature. In addition, the filament with stainless steel particles had a threefold increase in total VOCs compared to the copper and bronze particles. Two of three CNT-containing filaments emitted compounds that have not been reported before for PLA and PC. A comparison between certain emitted VOCs and their suggested maximum inhalation limits shows that printing as little as 20 g of certain filaments in a small, unventilated room can subject the user to hazardous concentrations of multiple toxic VOCs with carcinogenic properties (e.g., acetaldehyde, 1,4-dioxane, and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate). The use of certain additives, whether advertised or not, should be reevaluated due to their effects on VOC emissions during 3D printing. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Additive manufacturing; Indoor air quality; Polymer degradation; VOCs; Volatile organic compounds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33901889      PMCID: PMC8521456          DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   8.943


  15 in total

1.  Role of Fe2O3 in fly ash surrogate on PCDD/Fs formation from 2-monochlorophenol.

Authors:  Xia Guan; Ajit Ghimire; Phillip M Potter; Slawomir M Lomnicki
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Emissions of Nanoparticles and Gaseous Material from 3D Printer Operation.

Authors:  Yuna Kim; Chungsik Yoon; Seunghon Ham; Jihoon Park; Songha Kim; Ohhun Kwon; Perng-Jy Tsai
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Characterization of chemical contaminants generated by a desktop fused deposition modeling 3-dimensional Printer.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Ryan F LeBouf; Jinghai Yi; Jason Ham; Timothy Nurkewicz; Diane E Schwegler-Berry; Bean T Chen; J Raymond Wells; Matthew G Duling; Robert B Lawrence; Stephen B Martin; Alyson R Johnson; M Abbas Virji
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Airborne particle emission of a commercial 3D printer: the effect of filament material and printing temperature.

Authors:  L Stabile; M Scungio; G Buonanno; F Arpino; G Ficco
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.770

5.  Oxidation of siloxanes during biogas combustion and nanotoxicity of Si-based particles released to the atmosphere.

Authors:  Berrin Tansel; Sharon C Surita
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.860

6.  Characterization and Control of Nanoparticle Emission during 3D Printing.

Authors:  Ohhun Kwon; Chungsik Yoon; Seunghon Ham; Jihoon Park; Jinho Lee; Danbi Yoo; Yoojin Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  The characteristics and formation mechanisms of emissions from thermal decomposition of 3D printer polymer filaments.

Authors:  Shirun Ding; Bing Feng Ng; Xiaopeng Shang; Hu Liu; Xuehong Lu; Man Pun Wan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Costs, Benefits, and Adoption of Additive Manufacturing: A Supply Chain Perspective.

Authors:  Douglas Thomas
Journal:  Int J Adv Manuf Technol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.226

9.  Formation of PCDD/Fs from oxidation of 2-monochlorophenol over an Fe2O3/silica surface.

Authors:  Shadrack Nganai; Slawo Lomnicki; Barry Dellinger
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments.

Authors:  Parham Azimi; Dan Zhao; Claire Pouzet; Neil E Crain; Brent Stephens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Human exposure to metals in consumer-focused fused filament fabrication (FFF)/ 3D printing processes.

Authors:  Getachew Tedla; Annie M Jarabek; Peter Byrley; William Boyes; Kim Rogers
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-12-25       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  Microplastics and their Additives in the Indoor Environment.

Authors:  Tunga Salthammer
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 16.823

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.