Literature DB >> 33901209

Fall risk classification for people with lower extremity amputations using random forests and smartphone sensor features from a 6-minute walk test.

Kyle J F Daines1, Natalie Baddour2, Helena Burger3,4, Andrej Bavec3,4, Edward D Lemaire1.   

Abstract

Fall-risk classification is a challenging but necessary task to enable the recommendation of preventative programs for individuals identified at risk for falling. Existing research has primarily focused on older adults, with no predictive fall-risk models for lower limb amputees, despite their greater likelihood of fall-risk than older adults. In this study, 89 amputees with varying degrees of lower limb amputation were asked if they had fallen in the past 6 months. Those who reported at least one fall were considered a fall risk. Each participant performed a 6 minute walk test (6MWT) with an Android smartphone placed in a holder located on the back of the pelvis. A fall-risk classification method was developed using data from sensors within the smartphone. The Ottawa Hospital Rehabilitation Center Walk Test app captured accelerometer and gyroscope data during the 6MWT. From this data, foot strikes were identified, and 248 features were extracted from the collection of steps. Steps were segmented into turn and straight walking, and four different data sets were created: turn steps, straightaway steps, straightaway and turn steps, and all steps. From these, three feature selection techniques (correlation-based feature selection, relief F, and extra trees classifier ensemble) were used to eliminate redundant or ineffective features. Each feature subset was tested with a random forest classifier and optimized for the best number of trees. The best model used turn data, with three features selected by Correlation-based feature selection (CFS), and used 500 trees in a random forest classifier. The resulting metrics were 81.3% accuracy, 57.2% sensitivity, 94.9% specificity, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.587, and an F1 score of 0.83. Since the outcomes are comparable to metrics achieved by existing clinical tests, the classifier may be viable for use in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33901209     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  4 in total

1.  Experimental Verification of Micro-Doppler Radar Measurements of Fall-Risk-Related Gait Differences for Community-Dwelling Elderly Adults.

Authors:  Kenshi Saho; Masahiro Fujimoto; Yoshiyuki Kobayashi; Michito Matsumoto
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 2.  Development Technologies for the Monitoring of Six-Minute Walk Test: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ivan Miguel Pires; Hanna Vitaliyivna Denysyuk; María Vanessa Villasana; Juliana Sá; Diogo Luís Marques; José Francisco Morgado; Carlos Albuquerque; Eftim Zdravevski
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Prediction of fall risk among community-dwelling older adults using a wearable system.

Authors:  Thurmon E Lockhart; Rahul Soangra; Hyunsoo Yoon; Teresa Wu; Christopher W Frames; Raven Weaver; Karen A Roberto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Amputee Fall Risk Classification Using Machine Learning and Smartphone Sensor Data from 2-Minute and 6-Minute Walk Tests.

Authors:  Pascale Juneau; Natalie Baddour; Helena Burger; Andrej Bavec; Edward D Lemaire
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.