| Literature DB >> 3390114 |
S R Muza1, N A Pimental, H M Cosimini, M N Sawka.
Abstract
We examined the feasibility of providing ambient air during exercise and conditioned (cooled) air during rest on reducing physiological strain and optimizing tolerance time. Six male soldiers attempted 250-min exposures in hot/dry and hot/wet environments. Subjects wore chemical protective clothing over the combat vehicle crewman uniform and an air-cooled vest. They alternated between 50 min of treadmill walking (420 W) and 50 min of rest (105 W). During the walks, a backpack mounted blower provided a total of 10 or 18 cfm of air to the vest and face; while subjects received 18 cfm of conditioned air from an umbilical during rest. A control test with conditioned air during rest, but only a ventilated facepiece during work was also conducted in the hot/dry environment. In the hot/dry environment the ambient air backpack extended (p less than 0.05) tolerance time and significantly reduced rectal temperatures, heart rates and sweating rates compared to control; no differences were found between 10 and 18 cfm. In the hot/wet environment, tolerance time was extended compared to a predicted tolerance time assuming no microclimate cooling. We conclude that the ambient air backpack reduced physiological strain and improved tolerance time of combat vehicle crewmen during exercise in the heat.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1988 PMID: 3390114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aviat Space Environ Med ISSN: 0095-6562