Alejandro Peiro-Garcia1, Jonathan Bourget-Murray2,3, Isadora Suarez-Lorenzo4, Fabio Ferri-De-Barros2,3, David Parsons2,3. 1. Spine Unit, Division of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 4. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to examine whether surgical treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) or a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) resulted in fewer short-term (24 months) complications and reoperations. BACKGROUND: EOS is a challenging problem for spine surgeons that has been managed with different growth-friendly instrumentation systems. Although rib-based devices encourage spinal growth via regular lengthening, the high rate of complications and reoperations leads us to use spine-based devices such as MCGRs to mitigate this concern. METHODS: A total of 35 EOS patients were included in the study. Twenty patients were included in the VEPTR group, and 15 patients were included in the MCGR group. Demographic data and 2 years of postoperative complications and reoperations were reviewed retrospectively. As secondary outcomes, radiographic outcomes were reported preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. Indications for this technique and complications were collected from the charts. RESULTS: Demographic data showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Significant differences were found in the complications rate at 2 years, with 65% complications in the VEPTR group and 13.3% complications in the MCGR group (P < .001). The reoperation rate at 2 years was also significantly higher in the VEPTR group, with 50% versus 13.3% in the MCGR group (P = .0009). As secondary outcomes, radiological parameters such as main curve Cobb angle correction (P = .001) and apical vertebral translation (P = .002) were significantly higher in the MCGR group. Significant differences were also found in sagittal profile parameters; T1-T12 and T1-S1 were significantly higher in the MCGR group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, VEPTR has significantly higher complication and reoperation rates at 2 years postsurgery compared with MCGR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to examine whether surgical treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) or a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) resulted in fewer short-term (24 months) complications and reoperations. BACKGROUND: EOS is a challenging problem for spine surgeons that has been managed with different growth-friendly instrumentation systems. Although rib-based devices encourage spinal growth via regular lengthening, the high rate of complications and reoperations leads us to use spine-based devices such as MCGRs to mitigate this concern. METHODS: A total of 35 EOS patients were included in the study. Twenty patients were included in the VEPTR group, and 15 patients were included in the MCGR group. Demographic data and 2 years of postoperative complications and reoperations were reviewed retrospectively. As secondary outcomes, radiographic outcomes were reported preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. Indications for this technique and complications were collected from the charts. RESULTS: Demographic data showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Significant differences were found in the complications rate at 2 years, with 65% complications in the VEPTR group and 13.3% complications in the MCGR group (P < .001). The reoperation rate at 2 years was also significantly higher in the VEPTR group, with 50% versus 13.3% in the MCGR group (P = .0009). As secondary outcomes, radiological parameters such as main curve Cobb angle correction (P = .001) and apical vertebral translation (P = .002) were significantly higher in the MCGR group. Significant differences were also found in sagittal profile parameters; T1-T12 and T1-S1 were significantly higher in the MCGR group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, VEPTR has significantly higher complication and reoperation rates at 2 years postsurgery compared with MCGR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Authors: Casper S Tabeling; Justin V C Lemans; Anouk Top; E Pauline Scholten; Hilde W Stempels; Tom P C Schlösser; Keita Ito; René M Castelein; Moyo C Kruyt Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 4.964