Literature DB >> 33900648

Neonatal Osteomacs and Bone Marrow Macrophages Differ in Phenotypic Marker Expression and Function.

Safa F Mohamad1, Andrea Gunawan1, Rachel Blosser2, Paul Childress2, Alexandra Aguilar-Perez3, Joydeep Ghosh1, Jung Min Hong3, Jianyun Liu1, Deepa Kanagasabapathy2, Melissa A Kacena2, Edward F Srour1, Angela Bruzzaniti3.   

Abstract

Osteomacs (OM) are specialized bone-resident macrophages that are a component of the hematopoietic niche and support bone formation. Also located in the niche are a second subset of macrophages, namely bone marrow-derived macrophages (BM Mφ). We previously reported that a subpopulation of OM co-express both CD166 and CSF1R, the receptor for macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF), and that OM form more bone-resorbing osteoclasts than BM Mφ. Reported here are single-cell quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), mass cytometry (CyTOF), and marker-specific functional studies that further identify differences between OM and BM Mφ from neonatal C57Bl/6 mice. Although OM express higher levels of CSF1R and MCSF, they do not respond to MCSF-induced proliferation, in contrast to BM Mφ. Moreover, receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), without the addition of MCSF, was sufficient to induce osteoclast formation in OM but not BM Mφ cultures. OM express higher levels of CD166 than BM Mφ, and we found that osteoclast formation by CD166-/- OM was reduced compared with wild-type (WT) OM, whereas CD166-/- BM Mφ showed enhanced osteoclast formation. CD110/c-Mpl, the receptor for thrombopoietin (TPO), was also higher in OM, but TPO did not alter OM-derived osteoclast formation, whereas TPO stimulated BM Mφ osteoclast formation. CyTOF analyses demonstrated OM uniquely co-express CD86 and CD206, markers of M1 and M2 polarized macrophages, respectively. OM performed equivalent phagocytosis in response to LPS or IL-4/IL-10, which induce polarization to M1 and M2 subtypes, respectively, whereas BM Mφ were less competent at phagocytosis when polarized to the M2 subtype. Moreover, in contrast to BM Mφ, LPS treatment of OM led to the upregulation of CD80, an M1 marker, as well as IL-10 and IL-6, known anti-inflammatory cytokines. Overall, these data reveal that OM and BM Mφ are distinct subgroups of macrophages, whose phenotypic and functional differences in proliferation, phagocytosis, and osteoclast formation may contribute physiological specificity during health and disease.
© 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYTOF; MACROPHAGE; OSTEOCLAST; OSTEOMAC; PHAGOCYTOSIS; PROLIFERATION; SINGLE-CELL QRT-PCR; THROMBOPOIETIN

Year:  2021        PMID: 33900648     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  3 in total

1.  Sex-specific differences in direct osteoclastic versus indirect osteoblastic effects underlay the low bone mass of Pannexin1 deletion in TRAP-expressing cells in mice.

Authors:  Padmini Deosthale; Jung Min Hong; Alyson L Essex; Wilyaret Rodriguez; Dua Tariq; Harmandeep Sidhu; Alejandro Marcial; Angela Bruzzaniti; Lilian I Plotkin
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2022-01-04

2.  CCR2+ Macrophages Promote Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Alveolar Bone Remodeling.

Authors:  Hao Xu; Shuting Zhang; Adwait Amod Sathe; Zhichun Jin; Jiani Guan; Wen Sun; Chao Xing; Hanwen Zhang; Bin Yan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Determination of the physiological range of oxygen tension in bone marrow monocytes using two-photon phosphorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.

Authors:  Ayako Narazaki; Reito Shimizu; Toshitada Yoshihara; Junichi Kikuta; Reiko Sakaguchi; Seiji Tobita; Yasuo Mori; Masaru Ishii; Keizo Nishikawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.