Literature DB >> 33900528

The Scent of Ant Brood: Caste Differences in Surface Hydrocarbons of Formica exsecta Pupae.

Unni Pulliainen1,2, Nick Bos3, Patrizia d'Ettorre4, Liselotte Sundström5,6.   

Abstract

Chemical communication is common across all organisms. Insects in particular use predominantly chemical stimuli in assessing their environment and recognizing their social counterparts. One of the chemical stimuli used for recognition in social insects, such as ants, is the suite of long-chain, cuticular hydrocarbons. In addition to providing waterproofing, these surface hydrocarbons serve as a signature mixture, which ants can perceive, and use to distinguish between strangers and colony mates, and to determine caste, sex, and reproductive status of another individual. They can be both environmentally and endogenously acquired. The surface chemistry of adult workers has been studied extensively in ants, yet the pupal stage has rarely been considered. Here we characterized the surface chemistry of pupae of Formica exsecta, and examine differences among sexes, castes (reproductive vs. worker), and types of sample (developing individual vs. cocoon envelope). We found quantitative and qualitative differences among both castes and types of sample, but male and female reproductives did not differ in their surface chemistry. We also found that the pupal surface chemistry was more complex than that of adult workers in this species. These results improve our understanding of the information on which ants base recognition, and highlights the diversity of surface chemistry in social insects across developmental stages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ants; Caste; Formica; Pupae; Social insects; Surface hydrocarbons

Year:  2021        PMID: 33900528     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-021-01275-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  27 in total

Review 1.  Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants.

Authors:  A Lenoir; P D'Ettorre; C Errard; A Hefetz
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Learning and perceptual similarity among cuticular hydrocarbons in ants.

Authors:  Nick Bos; Stephanie Dreier; Charlotte G Jørgensen; John Nielsen; Fernando J Guerrieri; Patrizia d'Ettorre
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 2.354

3.  Cuticular chemistry of males and females in the ant Formica fusca.

Authors:  Anton Chernenko; Luke Holman; Heikki Helanterä; Liselotte Sundström
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Camponotus fellah colony integration: worker individuality necessitates frequent hydrocarbon exchanges.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Interspecific differences in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of Myrmica ants are sufficiently consistent to explain host specificity by Maculinea (large blue) butterflies.

Authors:  G Elmes; T Akino; J Thomas; R Clarke; J Knapp
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Nestmate recognition cues in the honey bee: differential importance of cuticular alkanes and alkenes.

Authors:  Francesca R Dani; Graeme R Jones; Silvia Corsi; Richard Beard; Duccio Pradella; Stefano Turillazzi
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  In-nest environment modulates nestmate recognition in the ant Camponotus fellah.

Authors:  Tamar Katzav-Gozansky; Raphael Boulay; Robert Vander Meer; Abraham Hefetz
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-03-11

8.  Nestmate recognition in ants is possible without tactile interaction.

Authors:  Andreas Simon Brandstaetter; Annett Endler; Christoph Johannes Kleineidam
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-03-19

9.  First evidence for slave rebellion: enslaved ant workers systematically kill the brood of their social parasite protomognathus americanus.

Authors:  Alexandra Achenbach; Susanne Foitzik
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Wax on, wax off: nest soil facilitates indirect transfer of recognition cues between ant nestmates.

Authors:  Nick Bos; Lena Grinsted; Luke Holman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.