INTRODUCTION: Hemoptysis is an alarming symptom that requires immediate investigation and management. Bronchial artery embolization (BAE) is a minimally invasive procedure that has become the treatment of choice of recurrent and massive hemoptysis. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of BAE for management of recurrent and/or massive hemoptysis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out of the medical records of 46 patients who were hospitalized in our department of pneumology in Mohamed Taher Maamouri hospital for hemoptysis and who underwent bronchial arteriography (BA) for the purpose of transarterial embolization. RESULTS: The most frequent causes of hemoptysis included idiopathic bronchiectasis (32.6%), pulmonary tumors (26%) and tuberculosis (8.6%) Embolization was successfully performed in 97.5% of cases. Immediate cessation of haemoptysis was achieved in 95%. Recurrence of haemoptysis was noted in 12% of cases. No major complication involving the vital or the functional prognosis, related to BAE was noted. Conclusions: Our study confirms the safety and the efficacy of the BAE for management of massive and/or recurrent hemoptysis.
INTRODUCTION: Hemoptysis is an alarming symptom that requires immediate investigation and management. Bronchial artery embolization (BAE) is a minimally invasive procedure that has become the treatment of choice of recurrent and massive hemoptysis. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of BAE for management of recurrent and/or massive hemoptysis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out of the medical records of 46 patients who were hospitalized in our department of pneumology in Mohamed Taher Maamouri hospital for hemoptysis and who underwent bronchial arteriography (BA) for the purpose of transarterial embolization. RESULTS: The most frequent causes of hemoptysis included idiopathic bronchiectasis (32.6%), pulmonary tumors (26%) and tuberculosis (8.6%) Embolization was successfully performed in 97.5% of cases. Immediate cessation of haemoptysis was achieved in 95%. Recurrence of haemoptysis was noted in 12% of cases. No major complication involving the vital or the functional prognosis, related to BAE was noted. Conclusions: Our study confirms the safety and the efficacy of the BAE for management of massive and/or recurrent hemoptysis.
Hemoptysis is a frequent manifestation of a wide variety of pulmonary diseases. It represents an
alarming event requiring adequate investigation and urgent treatment to stop bleeding and to prevent
relapse. Among the multiple therapeutic resources, bronchial artery embolization is currently considered
as the noninvasive procedure of choice for the management of massive and recurrent hemoptysis. When
performed by an experienced operator with an adequate technical platform, immediate clinical success,
defined as cessation of hemorrhage within 24 hours of BAE or within the same admission, may reach
75-98%, although recurrence rate of hemorrhage ranges from 1% to 27% within 1 month of BAE and from 10
to 55% between 1 and 46 months 1.
The purpose of this study is to identify and to characterize patients with hemoptysis who underwent
bronchial arteriography for embolization in our centre and to evaluate their short and long-term
outcomes.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 46 patients admitted for recurrent or massive hemoptysis
between January 2008 and June 2019 and for whom BA in the purpose of embolization was indicated.
Severity of hemoptysis was classified, according to the volume of expectorated blood, as following:
1. Massive hemoptysis was defined as coughing more than 200 milliliter of blood once or more than 500 cc
in 24 hours.
2. Moderate hemoptysis was defined as coughing from 50 to 200 milliliter of blood in a single day
3. Mild hemoptysis was classified when bleeding do not exceed 50 milliliters in a single day
Non-pulmonary promoting factors for hemoptysis such as antiplatelet drugs medication, oral
anticoagulants or coagulation disorders (thrombocytopenia defined by platelet count less than 150000
Elements/mm 3, spontaneous low prothrombin rate (PR) less than 50% or a prolonged activated partial
thromboplastin time (aPTT) more than 60 to 80 seconds) were identified. Results of the
investigation performed prior to BA to diagnose the underlying cause of bleeding and to locate it were
specified.
All BA were performed by an experienced interventional radiologist. It was carried out via the
right femoral artery access in all patients under local anesthesia, percutaneously, using the Seldinger
technique. Selective catheterization of bronchial and intercostal artery was performed with a 5 French
catheter (Cobra, Simmons or DESLER). Super selective catheterization of abnormal arteries using micro
catheters was performed wherever possible. Potential abnormality of bronchial and non-bronchial
vascularization, embolized arteries, embolic agents used and immediate results of BAE were specified in
the medical report of the radiologist.
Technical success of BAE was defined when the operator succeed to cannulate and to embolize all
visualized abnormal arteries. Clinical success referred to complete cessation or significant reduction
of hemoptysis within 24 hours of BAE or within the same hospitalization. Clinical failure indicated
continued or recurrent hemoptysis immediately after BAE requiring medical attention. Recurrence was
defined as significant hemoptysis occurring after an initial clinical success.
After BAE, incidence and severity of complications and mortality were assessed. Were qualified of major,
complications involving vital or functional patient prognosis.
Results
The mean age of our patients was 54.8± 16.4 years [30-90years]. Thirty-six patients (78.2%) were
male and 31 (67.4%) had a smoking history.
Additional promoting factors for hemoptysis, apart from their underlying lung disease, included:
antiplatelet drugs medication (2 patients); oral anticoagulants (2 patients); thrombocytopenia (4
patients) and spontaneous low PR for one patient.
Eight patients had presented acute respiratory failure and hypovolemic choc.
BAE was indicated for massive hemoptysis for 11 patients (24%) and for recurrent mild or moderate
hemoptysis for 35 patients (76%).
Chest X-ray performed on admission for all patients, showed nonspecific finding for 26 patients and
suggested the specific cause of bleeding and for the 20 others (43.4%).
Chest CT scan was performed for all our patients prior to BA and after hemodynamic and respiratory
stabilization. It identified the side of bleeding for 17 patients (36.9%). In these cases, it showed
localized ground glass opacities (n=11); localized parenchymatous condensation (n=2) and an
endobronchial defect hypodensity related to a blood clot (n=4). Chest CT scan diagnosed etiology of
bleeding for 32 patients (69.5%). For three patients, it found neither the side nor the cause of
bleeding.
Flexible bronchoscopy was performed before BA for 30 patients. It helped to determine the side of
bleeding for 16 patients (53.3%), the lobe for 10 patients (33.3%) and the cause of bleeding for 10
cases ((endobronchial tumors n=9; malignant airway stenosis n=1). It was not performed prior to BA for
16 patients because of abundance of hemoptysis for 11 patient and initial hypoxemia for the five others.
Etiologies of hemoptysis in our study were dominated by idiopathic bronchiectasis (n=15, 32.6%) followed
by tumor (n=12, 26%) (Primitive lung cancer n=10; pulmonary metastatic tumor n=2). Others causes were
tuberculosis (active n=2; sequel n=4), cystic fibrosis (n=1), pulmonary sequestration (n=1),
aspergilloma (n=1). No etiology was found for 10 patients (21.7%).
BA was normal for five patients. For the others 41 cases, it revealed vascular abnormalities and/or
parenchymatous blush. Four patients had two associated arteriographic abnormalities (Table 1) .
Super selective catheterization of abnormal arteries was possible for eighteen patients.
Different embolic agents were used for embolization: the most used was absorbable gelatin sponge
(Curaspon ®) for 23 patients and microspheres in three size ranges: 300 to 500 um, 500 to 700 um,
700 to 900 um for 16 patients. Polyvinylalcohol (PVA) particles, was used for 1 patient.
Technical success was achieved for 40 patients. Only one failure in embolization were noted. In fact,
the radiologist had identified spinal arteries arising from bronchial arteries for this patient.
Clinical failure was noticed in two cases suffering from bronchiectasis. For them, bleeding persisted
after embolization conducting to a second procedure eighteen days later for one case and to a
homeostasis surgery for the second.
Table 1. Arteriographic findings
Arteriographic finding
n
%
Normal
5
11
BA* hypertrophy and dilatation
23
50
Parenchymal hypervascularity
15
32
Parenchymatous blush
7
15
*BA= Bronchial arteryNo major complication related to embolization was observed. Two patients presented transient chest pain
without electrocardiographic modifications and one patient presented self-limited headache.
One patient suffering from acute respiratory failure due to massive hemoptysis died 4 days after
embolization and seventeen patients were lost to follow-up. For the others patients, the mean follow-up
were 825 days [range 19-3544 days]. Recurrence occurred in 5 patients (12%) (Table 2) .
Table 2. Clinical and angiographic details of bleeding relapse
Our study confirms the efficacy and the safety of BAE to treat hemoptysis. Over the last 50 years, this
technique has become the non invasive procedure of choice for the management of recurrent and massive
hemoptysis especially in case of no adequate response to medical care
2
3.
Previous definitions of massive hemoptysis relied only on the volume of expectorated blood. However,
recent literature tends to abandon this definition for several reasons. First the criterion of
abundance is confusing since there are several thresholds of volume of expectored blood proposed in the
literature data. Second, approximating the amount of hemoptysis is often imprecise and frequently over-
or underestimated. Third, clinical consequence of hemoptysis depend on not only the volume of
expectorated blood but also the rate of bleeding, the ability of the patient to clear blood from the
airways and the patient’s underlying physiological reserve. So, many authors, in the recent
literature data, prefer to define “massive hemoptysis” or “life threatening hemoptysis”
as the volume of expectorated blood involving the vital prognosis via the airway obstruction,
hypotension or blood loss
4
5. According to this definition, we account only nine life-
threatening hemoptysis among our studied patients.
An etiological assessment should be undertaken, in front of hemoptysis, immediately after airway and
hemodynamic stabilization. Clinical evaluation looks for similar episode, known coagulation disorders,
anticoagulant and antiagregant treatment and signs of pulmonary and extra pulmonary diseases. In
addition, physical examination should rule out non-pulmonary causes of bleeding such as epistaxis or
hematemesis. Biological investigation should include complete blood counts, profile coagulation and
liver and kidney function 6.
Chest X-ray should be systematic in the initial evaluation of all patients with hemoptysis as
recommended by the American College of Radiology 7. This
exploration
is inexpensive and
easily
accessible in almost tertiary care hospital but it has a low sensitivity to diagnose the underlying
cause of bleeding and its false-negative rate is as high as 20–40%
3
6. In our study chest
X-ray, systematically performed for all patients, provided information about the etiology of hemoptysis
in 43.4% of cases.
Although there are no established recommendations regarding performing systematically chest CT scan and
flexible bronchoscopy prior to BAE these tow investigations are widely performed in front of hemoptysis
7
8.
Panda et al. in systemic review of 22 studies on BAE published between 1976 and 2016 , reported that, in
eight recent studies, multidetector CT was performed in the 81%-100% of the sample patients and in seven
others studies contrast-enhanced CT was performed 7.
Multi-slice angio-CT provides a pulmonary vascular map as well as an exhaustive study of the
mediastinum and the parenchyma during the same acquisition. In addition, chest CT scan helps to
determine the side and the etiology of bleeding with a sensitivity superior to chest X-ray until 70–88.5%
and 60-77% respectively in case of massive hemoptysis
5
6. In our study, chest CT scan was more
helpful to identify the etiology of bleeding (76.1%) than to locate it (42.8%).
Several authors consider flexible bronchoscopy complementary to the chest CT scan to determinate the
cause and the origin of hemoptysis. It helps to identify the anatomic site and the cause of the
bleeding, evaluate the feasibility of therapeutic bronchoscopic intervention if required and to collect
samples for cytologic, pathologic, and microbiologic purposes
7
9. However, flexible bronchoscopy is
less sensitive in comparison with CT scan to diagnose the underlying cause of hemoptysis (48.7% of cases
versus 77.3% of cases)10. Recent Chinese recommendation emphased
that
the choice of
flexible
bronchoscopy vs chest CT scan and the timing of these explorations depend on the equipment availability,
institutional practice, and patient’s clinical status 6. In
our
local medical center,
this
endoscopic examination is considered each time the hemodynamic and the respiratory status of the patient
allows it. It was performed for 30 patients of our population and helped us to identify the site and the
cause of bleeding in 53.3% and 30% of cases respectively.
Etiologies of hemoptysis are numerous. In our population, bronchiectasis, tuberculosis, lung cancer were
the most frequent causes of hemoptysis. This finding is similar to literature data and the three causes
represent more than 50 % of etiologies of hemoptysis in several studies
5
11. However, despite
advancing technology and thorough investigation, the cause of wide proportion of hemoptysis remains
unknown up to 20% 5. This is similar to our results, and
cryptogenic
hemoptysis accounted
for 21.7% of
our studied population.
According to literature, BAE is an effective and safe tool to stop bleeding with technical success rate
varying from 81%–100% and immediate clinical success varying from 70%–99% depending on
studies 7. Similarly in our study, technical success was achieved
in
97.5% and medical
success in 95%
of cases. Complications of this procedure are rare and generally not major. According to the systemic
review published by Panda and al, the median incidence of major complication is 0.1% (0%–6.6%).
The most feared complication is transient or per-manent paraparesis or paraplegia. It occurred in
0.6%-4.4% and it is attributed to inadvertent embolization of spinal arteries arising from bronchial or
in¬tercostobronchial arteries. Superselective catheterization is recommended to ensure more distal
embolization to avoid this complication 7. No major complication
was
noted in our study.
Recurrence rate is variable according studies and ranges from to 9.8–57.5%
7. Early
recurrences
are probably due to incomplete embolization of incriminated vessels while late one are likely explicated
by recanalization of previously embellished vessels, revascularization of the collateral circulation or
progression of the underlying pulmonary disease 12.
According
to literature data, the
etiology
of hemoptysis is the main factor predictive of recurrence. Aspergillomas, reactivation TB, multidrug
resistant TB and idiopathic bronchiectasis were associated with a high risk of bleeding recurrence
6
13. Some authors think that the absorbable nature of embolic
agent
may foster medium and
long-term
recurrence
14
15. This fact is not supported by Swanson et al who found no
association between the
embolic agents used and recurrence 16.
There were some limitations to this study; sample size might be insufficient to identify minor factors
that could be associated with the recurrence of hemoptysis after BAE, and patients were not randomized
into different modalities of treatment for comparison.
Conclusion:
Our results confirm that BAE is a safe and effective treatment for severe and recurrent hemoptysis.
However, recurrences are possible, especially in case of progressive underlying disease. In that case,
another embolization may be proposed due to the high safety of the procedure.
Authors: N Tanaka; K Yamakado; S Murashima; K Takeda; K Matsumura; T Nakagawa; K Takano; M Ono; T Hattori Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 1997 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Michele Mondoni; Paolo Carlucci; Sara Job; Elena Maria Parazzini; Giuseppe Cipolla; Matteo Pagani; Francesco Tursi; Luigi Negri; Alessandro Fois; Sara Canu; Antonella Arcadu; Pietro Pirina; Martina Bonifazi; Stefano Gasparini; Silvia Marani; Andrea Claudio Comel; Franco Ravenna; Simone Dore; Fausta Alfano; Giuseppe Francesco Sferrazza Papa; Fabiano Di Marco; Stefano Centanni; Giovanni Sotgiu Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 16.671