| Literature DB >> 33899151 |
Stefano Tozza1, Dario Bruzzese2, Daniele Severi3, Emanuele Spina3, Rosa Iodice3, Lucia Ruggiero3, Raffaele Dubbioso3, Aniello Iovino3, Francesco Aruta3, Maria Nolano3, Lucio Santoro3, Fiore Manganelli3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A (CMT1A) patients, daily life is mainly influenced by mobility and ambulation dysfunctions. The aim of our work was to evaluate the perception of disturbances that mostly impact on daily life in CMT1A patients and its difference on the basis of age, gender, disability, and quality of life.Entities:
Keywords: CMT1A; Daily life; Hereditary neuropathy; Quality of life; Ranking approach
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33899151 PMCID: PMC8724072 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05254-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol Sci ISSN: 1590-1874 Impact factor: 3.307
Demographic and clinical data
| Male/female | 14/27 | |||||
| Age | 50.3 ± 17.8 (22–81) | |||||
| CMTNS | 15.2 ± 7.1 (1–29) | |||||
| SF-36_Mental | 58.5 ± 22.2 (8.8–96.7) | |||||
| SF-36_Physical | 55 ± 22.3 (7.8–93.3) | |||||
| Prevalence of ranking positions for each disturbances in the overall cohort | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Not complained | |
| Weakness in lower limbs | 36.6% | 22% | 24.4% | 12.2% | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Balance | 24.4% | 19.5% | 22% | 14.6% | 14.6% | 4.9% |
| Skeletal deformities | 14.6% | 26.8% | 19.5% | 24.4% | 9.8% | 4.9% |
| Sensory symptoms | 17.1% | 14.6% | 17.1% | 17.1% | 29.3% | 4.9% |
| Weakness in upper limbs | 4.9% | 17.1% | 12.2% | 26.8% | 31.7% | 7.3% |
Overall consensus ranking
| Consensus ranking | Mean ranking | |
|---|---|---|
| Weakness of lower limbs | 1 | 2.26 |
| Balance | 2 | 2.79 |
| Skeletal deformities | 2 | 2.79 |
| Sensory symptoms | 4 | 3.44 |
| Weakness of upper limbs | 5 | 3.71 |
Consensus ranking divided by different variables
| Consensus ranking | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | Female | |
| Weakness of lower limbs | 1 | 2 | 0.621 |
| Skeletal deformities | 2 | 3 | |
| Sensory symptoms | 4 | 4 | |
| Weakness of upper limbs | 5 | 5 | |
| Balance | 3 | 1 | |
| Age (years) | Age ≤ 52 | Age > 52 | |
| Weakness of lower limbs | 1 | 2 | |
| Skeletal deformities | 2 | 5 | |
| Sensory symptoms | 4 | 4 | |
| Weakness of upper limbs | 5 | 3 | |
| Balance | 3 | 1 | |
| Disease duration (years) | Duration ≤ 20 | Duration > 20 | |
| Weakness of lower limbs | 1 | 2 | |
| Skeletal deformities | 2 | 4 | |
| Sensory symptoms | 3 | 5 | |
| Weakness of upper limbs | 5 | 3 | |
| Balance | 4 | 1 | |
| CMTNS | CMTNS ≤ 15 | CMTNS > 15 | |
| Weakness of lower limbs | 1 | 2 | |
| Skeletal deformities | 3 | 4 | |
| Sensory symptoms | 2 | 5 | |
| Weakness of upper limbs | 5 | 3 | |
| Balance | 4 | 1 | |
| Mental domain SF-36 | Mental ≤ 54.4 | Mental > 54.4 | |
| Weakness of lower limbs | 1 | 1 | 0.352 |
| Skeletal deformities | 3 | 2 | |
| Sensory symptoms | 4 | 5 | |
| Weakness of upper limbs | 5 | 4 | |
| Balance | 2 | 3 | |
| Physical domain SF-36 | Physical ≤ 57.7 | Mental > 57.7 | |
| Weakness of lower limbs | 1 | 1 | 0.943 |
| Skeletal deformities | 3 | 2 | |
| Sensory symptoms | 4 | 4 | |
| Weakness of upper limbs | 5 | 5 | |
| Balance | 2 | 3 | |
In bold are reported significant p-value (p < 0.05)
Fig. 1Distribution of disturbance categories. For each disturbance categories, the rank score distribution (1: highest impact; 5: lowest impact; NC: not complained) was reported dividing by median age (a) and CMTNS (b)