| Literature DB >> 33898695 |
Sumiko Yoshitatsu1, Makiko Shiraishi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous reports have described methods for repairing full-thickness upper eyelid defects using lower eyelid tissue. To avoid sacrificing the lower eyelid and thereby prevent lower eyelid sagging or dysfunction, we used innervated orbicularis oculi myocutaneous flaps harvested from the upper eyelid for upper eyelid reconstruction.Entities:
Keywords: Bipedicled myocutaneous flap; Eyelid tumour; Full-thickness eyelid defect; Innervated myocutaneous flap; Orbicularis oculi muscle; Upper eyelid reconstruction
Year: 2021 PMID: 33898695 PMCID: PMC8056306 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2021.03.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JPRAS Open ISSN: 2352-5878
Figure 1Schema. A: After the upper eyelid tumour is widely resected, a mucosal graft is harvested from the lower lip and sutured to the conjunctival defect. At the lid margin, a small excess length (3 mm) of graft is retained. B: An orbicularis oculi myocutaneous flap is mobilized downward to the lid margin. The stump of the aponeurosis of the levator muscle is sutured to the upper edge of the flap. The stump is carefully sutured to a sufficiently deep portion of the upper edge of the flap to avoid the formation of an eyelid fold at this location. Sutures are adjusted so that the lid margin is naturally curved when the eyelid is raised. The lower edge of the mucosal graft is sutured to the lower edge of the flap skin. The lower edge of the flap must be securely covered with the mucosal graft. C: Profile view of Figure. B.
Figure 3Case involving a 55-year-old man (Patient 5). A: Sebaceous carcinoma on the right upper eyelid margin of the patient. B: The tumour is resected with a 7-mm margin. The stump of the levator aponeurosis is marked with 6–0 nylon suture. C: A lateral orbital flap is designed. D: The mucosal graft is sutured to the conjunctival defect with 7–0 Vicryl sutures. At the lid margin, a small excess (3 mm) is retained. Forceps are used to hold the 6–0 nylon suture marking the stump of the levator aponeurosis. E: The donor site of the bipedicled orbicularis oculi myocutaneous flap is repaired with the lateral orbital flap.
Figure 2Schema for Patient 5. A: A lateral orbital flap is designed. B: The donor site of the bipedicled orbicularis oculi myocutaneous flap is repaired with a lateral orbital flap.
Patient characteristics.
| Patient no. | Age/sex | diagnosis | tumour size height × width (mm) | Defect size height × width (mm) | Method of donor site repair | Follow-up period (years) | Oncological results | Functional results | Cosmetic results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 58/F | MCC | 10 × 8 | 18 × 28 | Median forehead flap | 11 | Metastasis in deep parotid gland | Good | Fair |
| 2 | 81/M | SC | 6 × 9 | 10 × 19 | None | 1 | No recurrence | Excellent | Good |
| 3 | 76/M | BCC | 8 × 7.5 | 10 × 13.5 | Two-stage skin graft | 5.5 | No recurrence | Excellent | Excellent |
| 4 | 85/F | SC | 12 × 12 | 15 × 22 | Two-stage skin graft | 5 | No recurrence | Excellent | Good |
| 5 | 55/M | SC | 6 × 8 | 11 × 22 | Lateral orbital flap | 3 | No recurrence | Excellent | Excellent |
| 6 | 77/F | BCC | 7 × 7 | 9 × 13 | None | 1 | No recurrence | Excellent | Excellent |
MCC: Merkel cell carcinoma; SC: sebaceous carcinoma; BCC: basal cell carcinoma.
Figure 4Three years after the surgery (Patient 5). A: The eyelid appearance and function remain in excellent condition. B: In the bipedicled orbicularis oculi myocutaneous flap, a double eyelid fold has been secondarily created using 6–0 nylon buried sutures. C: When the eyelids are firmly closed, the reconstructed eyelid shows strong contracture of the orbicularis oculi muscle, which is .similar to that of the contralateral eyelid.
Photograph-based functional evaluation scores.
| Status | No asymmetry | Mild asymmetry | Moderate asymmetry | Severe asymmetry |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1) Eyelid opened | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 2) Eyelid gently closed | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 3) Eyelid firmly closed | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Total score (TS) was calculated as the sum of 1), 2), and 3).
Poor, 0 ≤ mean TS < 2.25; Fair, 2.25 ≤ mean TS < 4.5; Good, 4.5≤ mean TS < 6.75; Excellent, 6.75 ≤ mean TS ≤ 9.
Photograph-based cosmetic evaluation scores.
| Features | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1) Eyelid colour match | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 2)Eyelid texture match | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 3)Bilateral symmetry | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Total score (TS) was calculated as the sum of 1), 2), and 3).
Poor, 0 ≤ mean TS < 2.25; Fair, 2.25 ≤ mean TS < 4.5; Good, 4.5 ≤ mean TS < 6.75; Excellent, 6.75 ≤ mean TS ≤9.