| Literature DB >> 33897666 |
Yi Ma1, Chao Wang2, Hao Zhang1, Lihuai Yu1, Li Dong1, Daoqing Gong1, Junhu Yao3, Hongrong Wang1.
Abstract
Long-term supplementation of a high-concentrate diet enhances the accumulation of lactate and decrease in pH in goat rumen, thereby disrupting the composition of microbial community. Studies have shown that incorporation of thiamine in high-concentrate diet increases ruminal pH and decreases rumen lactate concentration. To explore the effects of thiamine supplementation with a high-concentrate diet on alteration of the whole ruminal microbiota and their metabolites, 18 mid-lactating Saanen goats were randomly fed with one of three diets: (1) control diet (CON; n = 6; concentrate:forage 30:70), (2) high-concentrate diet (HG; n = 6; concentrate:forage 70:30), and (3) high-concentrate diet with 200 mg of thiamine/kg of DMI (HGT; n = 6; concentrate:forage 70:30). The goats received experimental diets for 8 weeks. Ruminal samples were collected on the last day of the 8 weeks for 16S rRNA gene sequencing and the liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer (LC-MS) analysis. The results revealed significant alterations of the ruminal bacterial community structure and diversity in HGT groups compared to HG groups, with an overall dominance of Bacteroidetes at the phylum level and Oribacterium (P < 0.05), Anaerobiospirillum (P < 0.01), and Fibrobacter (P < 0.01) at genus level in the HGT group. The LC-MS analysis revealed that thiamine supplementation resulted in lower levels of propionate (P < 0.05), pyruvate (P < 0.01), lactate (P < 0.05), putrescine (P < 0.05), tyramine (P < 0.05), and histamine (P < 0.01) and higher levels of acetate (P < 0.05), succinates (P < 0.01), oxaloacetic acid (P < 0.01), leucine (P < 0.01), valine (P < 0.05), linoleic acid (P < 0.05), docosahexaenoic acid (P < 0.05), and 4-phenylbutyric acid (P < 0.05) in the HGT group than in the HG group. The decrease in these compounds enhanced homeostasis in the rumen environment and suppressed epithelial inflammation. Correlation analysis revealed the potential relationships between ruminal metabolites and microbial community. These findings demonstrate that thiamine supplementation can alleviate subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) by stabilizing the microbial community and reducing toxic unnatural compounds.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing; LC-MS; SARA; dairy goats; thiamine
Year: 2021 PMID: 33897666 PMCID: PMC8058204 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.653283
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Ruminal microbial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with different treatments of diets. CON: basal diets without supplement; HG: high-concentrate diet; HGT: high-concentrate diet supplemented with 200 mg of thiamine / kg of DMI. (A) Venn diagram of ruminal bacterial OTUs. The number of unique OTUs were represented by the non-overlapped portion of Venn diagram for each group. (B) Bacterial rarefaction curves based on OTUs were used to assess the depth of coverage for each sample.
FIGURE 2Percentage composition of the top 10 predominant phyla in rumen fluid. CON: basal diets without supplement; HG: high-concentrate diet; HGT: high-concentrate diet supplemented with 200 mg of thiamine / kg of DMI.
Number of observed species, richness, and diversity indices in ruminal samples from each dietary treatment.
| Items | Treatments1 | SEM2 | |||
| CON | HG | HGT | |||
| OTU3 | 612.50 | 576.25 | 587.50 | 7.75 | 0.147 |
| ACE4 | 675.39a | 628.46b | 659.04ab | 8.12 | 0.036 |
| Chao1 | 705.20a | 669.38b | 683.90ab | 6.06 | 0.032 |
| Shannon | 6.81a | 6.71b | 6.79a | 0.02 | 0.023 |
| Simpson | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.01 | 0.102 |
| Coverage (%) | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 0.00 | 0.405 |
FIGURE 3Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of bacterial community structures of the ruminal microbiota in CON (red circles), HG (blue rectangle), and HGT (green triangle) groups. CON: basal diets without supplement; HG: high-concentrate diet; HGT: high-concentrate diet supplemented with 200 mg of thiamine / kg of DMI.
Effects of thiamine supplementation on relative abundance in rumen fluid at phylum level1.
| Phylum | Treatments2 | SEM3 | |||
| CON | HG | HGT | |||
| Firmicutes | 32.37b | 46.20a | 38.78ab | 2.22 | 0.016 |
| Bacteroidetes | 64.17a | 48.76b | 58.30a | 2.24 | 0.000 |
| Proteobacteria | 1.64 | 2.26 | 1.36 | 0.19 | 0.159 |
| Fibrobacteres | 0.11a | 0.06b | 0.08b | 0.01 | 0.008 |
| Synergistetes | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.248 |
| Euryarchaeota | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.551 |
| Spirochaetes | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.652 |
| Gracilibacteria | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.663 |
| Chloroflexi | 0.43 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.04 | 0.488 |
| unidentified_Bacteria | 0.27 | 0.46 | 0.34 | 0.05 | 0.373 |
Effects of thiamine supplementation on relative abundance in rumen fluid at genus level1.
| Phylum | Family | Genus | Treatments2 | SEM3 | |||
| CON | HG | HGT | |||||
| Firmicutes | Veillonellaceae | Succiniclasticum | 3.12b | 6.97a | 4.83ab | 0.60 | 0.013 |
| Lachnospiraceae | Oribacterium | 0.36ab | 0.22b | 0.47a | 0.04 | 0.037 | |
| Acetitomaculum | 0.89a | 0.62b | 0.76ab | 0.04 | 0.012 | ||
| Ruminococcaceae | Papillibacter | 0.54a | 0.32b | 0.24b | 0.05 | 0.004 | |
| Saccharofermentans | 0.73a | 0.49b | 0.68ab | 0.04 | 0.031 | ||
| Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidaceae | Bacteroides | 0.79a | 0.47b | 0.64ab | 0.05 | 0.014 |
| Prevotellaceae | Prevotella_1 | 7.44a | 8.17a | 6.54b | 0.27 | 0.022 | |
| Prevotella_7 | 0.17b | 0.77a | 0.58a | 0.08 | 0.000 | ||
| Uncultured Prevotellaceae | 0.16a | 0.09b | 0.14a | 0.01 | 0.015 | ||
| Proteobacteria | Succinivibrionaceae | Anaerobiospirillum | 0.25b | 0.18c | 0.34a | 0.02 | 0.006 |
| Fibrobacteres | Fibrobacteraceae | Fibrobacter | 0.34a | 0.11 | 0.27a | 0.07 | 0.002 |
FIGURE 4The volcano plot of differential metabolites with different treatments of diets. The gray plot shows there is no difference, the red plots show up-regulated endogenous metabolites, while the green plots show down-regulated endogenous metabolites. VIP value represents the importance projection value of the metabolite obtained in the PLS-DA model compared in this group. CON: basal diets without supplement; HG: high-concentrate diet; HGT: high-concentrate diet supplemented with 200 mg of thiamine / kg of DMI. (A) The volcano plot between the HG and the HGT group in the positive polarity mode. (B) The volcano plot between the HG and the HGT group in the negative polarity mode. (C) The volcano plot between the HGT and the HG group in the positive polarity mode. (D) The volcano plot between the HGT and the HG group in the negative polarity mode.
Different metabolites content in the rumen of goats fed SARA-induced diet (HG) versus goats fed SARA-induced diet with thiamine supplementation (HGT).
| No. | Metabolites | Formula | Group1 | VIP2 | Log2 FC3 | Trend | |
| 1 | Acetate | C2H4O2 | HG vs CON | 1.6354 | –2.0534 | down | |
| HGT vs HG | 1.3654 | 2.0534 | up | ||||
| 2 | Propionate | C3H6O2 | HG vs CON | 1.4863 | 1.5273 | up | |
| HGT vs HG | 1.2853 | –3.2273 | down | ||||
| 3 | Pyruvate | C3H4O3 | HG vs CON | 1.4476 | 1.5471 | up | |
| HGT vs HG | 1.4278 | –2.0464 | down | ||||
| 4 | Lactate | C3H6O3 | HG vs CON | 1.5497 | 1.5531 | up | |
| HGT vs HG | 1.5763 | –3.0531 | down | ||||
| 5 | Succinates | C4H6O4 | HG vs CON | 2.1016 | –2.1624 | down | |
| HGT vs HG | 1.9336 | 2.1624 | up | ||||
| 6 | Oxaloacetate | C4H4O5 | HG vs CON | 2.0293 | –1.6257 | down | |
| HGT vs HG | 2.1373 | 1.4355 | up | ||||
| 7 | Leucine | C6H13NO2 | HG vs CON | 1.5213 | –1.3642 | down | |
| HGT vs HG | 1.8203 | 1.2647 | up | ||||
| 8 | Valine | C5H11NO2 | HG vs CON | 1.8042 | –1.1261 | down | |
| HGT vs HG | 2.1045 | 1.1152 | up | ||||
| 9 | Putrescine | C4H12N2 | HG vs CON | 1.3795 | 1.2485 | up | |
| HGT vs HG | 1.9095 | –1.6472 | down | ||||
| 10 | Tyramine | C8H11NO | HG vs CON | 1.4148 | 1.4471 | up | |
| HGT vs HG | 1.4143 | –1.5876 | down | ||||
| 11 | Histamine | C5H9N3 | HG vs CON | 1.3126 | 1.5864 | up | |
| HGT vs HG | 2.0136 | –1.9674 | down | ||||
| 12 | Linoleic acid | C18H32O2 | HG vs CON | 1.7595 | –1.5438 | down | |
| HGT vs HG | 1.6590 | 1.2454 | up | ||||
| 13 | Docosahexaenoic Acid | C22H32O2 | HG vs CON | 2.1549 | –1.3728 | down | |
| HGT vs HG | 1.6549 | 1.7629 | up | ||||
| 14 | 4-Phenylbutyric acid | C10H12O2 | HG vs CON | 1.6728 | –1.0624 | down | |
| HGT vs HG | 1.3732 | 1.0844 | up | ||||
FIGURE 5Correlation analysis between genera and metabolite concentrations affected by the feed high-concentrate diet with thiamine supplementation. Each row in the graph represents a genus, each column represents a metabolite, and each lattice represents a Pearson correlation coefficient between a component and a metabolite. Red represents a positive correlation, while blue represents a negative correlation.