PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between the size of the venous structures related to the inner ear and the degree of endolymphatic hydrops (EH). METHODS: Thirty-four patients with a suspicion of EH underwent whole brain MR imaging including the inner ear. Images were obtained pre- and post-administration, and at 4 and 24 hours after the intravenous administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent (IV-GBCA). The cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the internal jugular vein (IJV), superior petrosal sinus (SPS), and inferior petrosal sinus (IPS) were measured on the magnetization prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo (MPRAGE) images obtained immediately after the IV-GBCA. The grade of EH was determined on the hybrid of reversed image of positive endolymph signal and native image of positive perilymph signal (HYDROPS) images obtained at 4 hours after IV-GBCA as no, mild, and significant EH according to the previously proposed grading system for the cochlea and vestibule, respectively. The ipsilateral CSA was compared between groups with each level of EH grade. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between EH grades for the CSA of the IJV or that of the IPS in either the cochlea or the vestibule. The CSA of the SPS in the groups with significant EH was significantly smaller than that in the group with no EH, for both the cochlea (P < 0.01) and the vestibule (P < 0.05). In an ROC analysis to predict significant EH, the cut-off CSA value in the SPS was 3.905 mm2 for the cochlea (AUC: 0.8762, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7952‒0.9572) and 3.805 mm2 for the vestibule (AUC: 0.7727, 95% CI: 0.6539‒0.8916). CONCLUSION: In the ears with significant EH in the cochlea or vestibule, the CSA of the ipsilateral SPS was smaller than in the ears without EH.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between the size of the venous structures related to the inner ear and the degree of endolymphatic hydrops (EH). METHODS: Thirty-four patients with a suspicion of EH underwent whole brain MR imaging including the inner ear. Images were obtained pre- and post-administration, and at 4 and 24 hours after the intravenous administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent (IV-GBCA). The cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the internal jugular vein (IJV), superior petrosal sinus (SPS), and inferior petrosal sinus (IPS) were measured on the magnetization prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo (MPRAGE) images obtained immediately after the IV-GBCA. The grade of EH was determined on the hybrid of reversed image of positive endolymph signal and native image of positive perilymph signal (HYDROPS) images obtained at 4 hours after IV-GBCA as no, mild, and significant EH according to the previously proposed grading system for the cochlea and vestibule, respectively. The ipsilateral CSA was compared between groups with each level of EH grade. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between EH grades for the CSA of the IJV or that of the IPS in either the cochlea or the vestibule. The CSA of the SPS in the groups with significant EH was significantly smaller than that in the group with no EH, for both the cochlea (P < 0.01) and the vestibule (P < 0.05). In an ROC analysis to predict significant EH, the cut-off CSA value in the SPS was 3.905 mm2 for the cochlea (AUC: 0.8762, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7952‒0.9572) and 3.805 mm2 for the vestibule (AUC: 0.7727, 95% CI: 0.6539‒0.8916). CONCLUSION: In the ears with significant EH in the cochlea or vestibule, the CSA of the ipsilateral SPS was smaller than in the ears without EH.
Entities:
Keywords:
endolymphatic hydrops; gadolinium; magnetic resonance imaging; vein
Meniere’s disease (MD) is a disorder of the inner ear, which causes vertigo attacks, fluctuating hearing loss, tinnitus, and aural fullness. The etiology of MD is multifactorial, and a characteristic sign of MD is endolymphatic hydrops (EH). Direct visualization of EH is now possible by contrast enhanced MR imaging.– Currently, MR imaging obtained at 4 hours after intravenous administration of a single dose of gadolinium-based contrast agent (IV-SD-GBCA) is the method frequently utilized for a detailed evaluation of EH in the clinic.– The hybrid of reversed image of positive endolymph signal and native image of positive perilymph signal (HYDROPS) images and 3D-real inversion recovery (IR) images are widely used for this precise evaluation.,,The true etiology and pathophysiology of EH remains incompletely understood. Various mechanisms have been proposed for the potential causes of EH, i.e. blockage of the endolymphatic duct and sac, hypoproteinemia, increased vasopressin levels, genetic components, and vascular impairment., The venous drainage of the inner ear is via the vein of the cochlear aqueduct and the cochlear vein, and the veins of the vestibular aqueduct (the veins of the ampulla, and the superior, lateral and posterior canal). The venous blood empties either directly into the inferior and superior petrosal sinus (IPS, SPS) or internal jugular vein (IJV).Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) is characterized by combined stenoses of the principal pathways for extracranial venous drainage, including the IJV and the azygos vein, with the development of collateral circles and insufficient drainage. CCSVI has been reported to be associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). The CCSVI has also been reported as a potential pathogenetic mechanism for the development of MD. This vascular impairment significantly affects the venous drainage of the inner ear., Interventional therapy for CCSVI has been reported to improve MD symptoms., The CCSVI can be noninvasively diagnosed by combined transcranial and extracranial echo color Doppler, which measures five variables in various head positions indicative of CCSVI.Contrast enhanced 3D-T1-weighted images (CE-T1WI) obtained immediately after IV-SD-GBCA can assess the size of the SPS, IPS, and IJV, although the patient’s body must be in a supine position. Compared to the HYDROPS or 3D-real IR images obtained at 4 hours after IV-SD-GBCA for the visualization of EH, CE-T1WI can be obtained in a greater population because there is no need for a long 4-hour wait time or sophisticated pulse sequences.The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the size of the SPS, IPS, and IJV correlates with the degree of EH and to evaluate if the size of these venous structures could predict the presence of EH.
Materials and Methods
Patients
The subjects were 34 patients suspected of EH (16 women and 18 men, age: 23–80, median age: 50.5). In all cases, the estimated glomerular filtration rate was 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater. There were no cases with brain tumors or large cerebral infarctions.
MR imaging
The images were obtained pre- and post-administration, and at 4 and 24 hours after the intravenous administration of a single dose (0.1 mmol/kg) of macrocyclic GBCA (gadobutrol; Bayer Yakuhin, Osaka, Japan) (IV-SD-GBCA). Images at multiple time points were obtained to rule out tumor and vascular lesions and to assess the size of endolymphatic space, as well as the permeability of the blood-labyrinthine and blood-CSF barriers. A 3T MR scanner (MAGNETOM Skyra; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a 32-channel head coil was used.The detailed MR parameters for the magnetization prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo (MPRAGE),– positive perilymph image (PPI), positive endolymph image (PEI),, and 3D-real IR image,, are shown in Table 1. The PPI is based on a heavily T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery using 3D-sampling perfection sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE) sequence. The ethical committee of our institution approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Table 1
Pulse sequence parameters
Parameter
MPRAGE
PPI and PEI
3D-real IR
Sequence type
3D Gradient echo
SPACE with inversion pulse
SPACE with inversion pulse
Slab orientation
sagittal
axial
axial
Repetition time (ms)
1570 (IR-IR), 6.7 (α-α)
9000
15130
Echo time (ms)
2.22
544
549
Inversion time (ms)
800
PPI: 2250 / PEI: 2050
2700
Fat suppression
NA
CHESS
CHESS
Flip angle (degree)
15
90/constant 120
90/constant 145
Section thickness/gap (mm)
1.0/0.0
1.0/0.0
1.0/0.0
Pixel size (mm)
1.0 × 1.0
0.5 × 0.5
0.5 × 0.5
Number of slices
256
104
256
Echo train length
1
173
256
FOV (mm)
230 × 256
165 × 196
165 × 196
Matrix size
232 × 256
324 × 384
324 × 384
Parallel imaging/Accel. factor
GRAPPA/2
GRAPPA/2
GRAPPA/3
Band width (Hz/Px)
200
434
434
Number of excitations
1
2
1
Scan time (min)
3
7 for each
11
3D-real IR, 3D real inversion recovery with phase sensitive reconstruction; α-α, time between α pulses; CHESS, chemical shift selective; GRAPPA, generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition; IR-IR, time between inversion pulses; MPRAGE, magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo; NA, not applicable; PEI, positive endolymph image; PPI, positive perilymph image; SPACE, sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutions.
Grading of EH
The presence of EH was assessed by an experienced radiologist as none, mild, and significant, using the HYDROPS images (i.e. the subtraction of the PEI from the PPI) and the 3D-real IR images obtained at 4 hours after IV-SD-GBCA according to the Nakashima grade for the left and right cochlea and the vestibule, respectively. As previously reported, the Nakashima grade of the vestibule was determined on the lowest axial slice in which more than 2/3 of the lateral semicircular canal was visible. For EH grading, HYDROPS images at 4 hours after IV-SD-GBCA were utilized; however, the 3D-real IR images at 4 hours after IV-SD-GBCA were referenced, if there was a mis-registration artifact on the HYDROPS images. The diagnosis of the degree of EH was already recorded in the electronic medical record of our hospital at least 6 months prior to the present study.
Measurement of the vein cross-sectional areas
The cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the IJV, SPS, and IPS were measured on MPRAGE images obtained immediately after IV-SD-GBCA. The display window width and level were set as 1000/500. On a picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) viewer (RapideyeCore; Canon Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan), the MPRAGE images were displayed. Using the interactive multiplanar reformation (MPR) function, the CSA (mm2) was manually measured for the right and left IJV, SPS, and IPS, respectively.Instruction for CSA measurement in each vein is as follows:For measurement of IJV, display the axial section crossing the lower edge of the anterior arch of the atlas (C1) while referring to the midsagittal section using the MPR function. Then, contour the right and left IJV using the free ROI function. Measure the CSA of the right and left IJV separately.For measurement of SPS, display the axial image containing the SPS. Set an oblique coronal section perpendicular to the right SPS. Then, scroll in the oblique coronal plane and find the vertical portion of the ipsilateral facial nerve. On this oblique coronal section, measure the CSA of the SPS using the free ROI function. Note that the dura contacting the SPS should not be included in the ROI. The left side should be measured in a similar way.For measurement of IPS, scroll the axial image to the level of the inferior edge of the pons, referring to the midsagittal section. Then, scroll the coronal image to the cross point of the dorsal edge of the Clivus and the axial image to the level of the inferior edge of the pons. On this coronal section, measure the CSA of the right and left IPS separately. Note that the dura contacting the IPS should not be included in the ROI. Although this coronal section might not be completely perpendicular to IPS, this coronal section was designated to provide high reproducibility.Two experienced neuroradiologists (S.N. and H.K. with 33 and 23 years of experience, respectively) independently measured the CSA of the veins after attending the training session together, using the two cases of image data not included in the present study. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [2,1]) for the agreement of the measured CSA between the two radiologists were calculated. The values by the two radiologists were averaged and used for the subsequent analysis. Examples for the ROI placement are shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
Examples of the ROI placement on contrast enhanced MPRAGE images. (a) On an axial section at the level of the inferior edge of the anterior arch of the atlas, the internal jugular vein of each side was manually contoured (ROI #1 and #2). (b) On an oblique coronal section, perpendicular to the SPS (arrow) at the level of the vertical portion of the facial nerve (short arrow), the SPS was contoured (ROI #1). (c) On a coronal section as described in the Methods, the IPS of each side was manually contoured (ROI #1 and #2). IPS, inferior petrosal sinus; MPRAGE, magnetization prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo; SPS, superior petrosal sinus.
Statistical analysis
The ICC (2, 1) was calculated to evaluate the interobserver reliability.The CSA of the ipsilateral venous structures was compared between the ears with no, mild, and significant EH for the cochlea and vestibular using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. For the CSA of the venous structure with a significant difference between the EH grades, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed and the area under the curve (AUC) was measured. The cut-off value of the CSA for prediction of significant EH was determined by maximization of the Youden index (sensitivity + specificity − 1).We used SPSS Statistics software version 27.0.0. 64bit (IBM, Chicago, IL USA) for the ICC (2, 1) and ANOVA statistical analyses. A value of 5% was adopted as the significance level for statistical testing. The software R (version 3.3.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.R-project.org/) was used for the ROC analyses.
Results
Distribution of EH grades in all 68 ears for cochlea was 19 ears with no EH, 20 ears with mild EH, and 29 ears with significant EH, while that for vestibule was 50 ears with no EH, 7 ears with mild EH, and 11 ears with significant EH.The ICCs (2, 1) between two observers were quite high at 0.997 (95% confidence interval; 0.994–0.999) for IJV, 0.988 (0.971–0.994) for SPS, and 0.978 (0.737–0.993) for IPS.The average (± standard deviation) CSAs (mm2) were 21.5 ± 15.3 for IJV, 4.0 ± 1.9 for SPS, and 8.1 ± 4.3 for IPS. The box-and-whisker plots of each EH group for IJV, SPS, and IPS are shown in Figs. 2a-f. There were two sides of hypoplastic IJV. For these hypoplastic IJVs, CSA was set as 0 by both observers. There was a hypoplastic SPS. For this SPS, CSA was set as 0 by both observers.
Fig. 2
(a) A box-and-whisker plot of the cross-sectional area of the IJV of the group without cochlear EH, the mild EH group, and the significant EH group. The lower side of the rectangle is the first quartile (25th percentile value) and the upper side is the 75th percentile value. The thick horizontal line in the rectangle is the median. The horizontal line under the whisker indicates the 10th percentile value, and the horizontal line above the whisker indicates the 90th percentile value. There is an overlap between the three groups and there were no significant differences between the groups. (b) A box-and-whisker plot of the cross-sectional area of the IJV in the group without vestibular EH, the mild EH group, and the significant EH group. There is an overlap between the three groups and there were no significant differences between the groups. (c) A box-and-whisker plot of the cross-sectional area of the SPS of the group without cochlear EH, the mild EH group, and the significant EH group. There were some overlaps between the three groups; however, there were significant differences between the groups (**P < 0.01). (d) A box-and-whisker plot of the cross-sectional area of the SPS of the group without vestibular EH, the mild EH group, and the significant EH group. There were some overlaps between the three groups; however, there were significant differences between the groups (*P < 0.05). (e) A box-and-whisker plot of the cross-sectional area of the IPS of the group without cochlear EH, the mild EH group, and the significant EH group. There was an overlap between the three groups, and there was no significant difference between the groups. (f) A box-and-whisker plot of the cross-sectional area of the IPS of the group without vestibular EH, the mild EH group, and the significant EH group. There was an overlap between the three groups, and there was no significant difference between the groups. EH, endolymphatic hydrops; IJV, internal jugular vein; IPS, inferior petrosal sinus; SPS, superior petrosal sinus.
For the CSA of IJV and IPS, there was no significant differences between the ears with different EH grades.There was a significant difference of the mean CSA of the SPS between the ears with no cochlear EH and significant cochlear EH (P < 0.01) and between the ears with mild cochlear EH and significant cochlear EH (P < 0.01).There was a significant difference of the mean CSA of the SPS between the ears with no vestibular EH and significant vestibular EH (P < 0.05; P = 0.020)The ROC curve for predicting cochlear significant EH by the CSA of the SPS is shown in Fig. 3a. The AUC was 0.8762 (95% CI: 0.7952–0.9572). The cut-off value of the CSA for the SPS was 3.905 mm2 (specificity of 0.828, sensitivity of 0.795, positive predictive value of 0.861, and negative predictive value of 0.750).
Fig. 3
(a) ROC curve for significant cochlear endolymphatic hydrops by the cross-sectional area of the superior petrosal sinus. The AUC was 0.8762 with a 95% CI: 0.7952–0.9572. The cut-off value of 3.905 mm2 (Youden index) provided a specificity of 0.828 and a sensitivity of 0.795. (b) The ROC curve for the group with significant vestibular endolymphatic hydrops by the cross-sectional area of the superior petrosal sinus. The AUC was 0.7727 with a 95% CI: 0.6539–0.8916. The cut-off value of 3.805 mm2 (Youden index) provided a specificity of 0.909 and a sensitivity of 0.623. AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
The ROC curve for predicting significant EH in the vestibule by the CSA of the SPS is shown in Fig. 3b. The AUC was 0.7727 (95% CI: 0.6539–0.8916). The cut-off value of the CSA for the SPS was 3.805 mm2 (specificity of 0.909, sensitivity of 0.632, positive predictive value of 0.973, and negative predictive value of 0.323).Images from representative patients are shown in Figs. 4 and 5.
Fig. 4
A male patient in his 50s. (a) On the HYDROPS image, there is no endolymphatic hydrops in the left inner ear for either the cochlea or the vestibule. (b) An oblique coronal MPRAGE image obtained immediately after IV-GBCA, perpendicular to the superior petrosal sinus. A well-developed superior petrosal sinus is visualized (arrow). The vertical portion of the facial nerve is seen (short arrow). HYDROPS, hybrid of reversed image of positive endolymph signal and native image of positive perilymph signal; IV-GBCA, intravenous administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent; MPRAGE, magnetization prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo.
Fig. 5
A male patient in his 50s. (a) There is significant endolymphatic hydrops in the left inner ear in both the cochlea and the vestibule on the HYDROPS image (arrows). (b) An oblique coronal MPRAGE image obtained immediately after IV-GBCA, perpendicular to the superior petrosal sinus. A poorly developed superior petrosal sinus is visualized (arrow). The vertical portion of the facial nerve is seen (short arrow). HYDROPS, hybrid of reversed image of positive endolymph signal and native image of positive perilymph signal; IV-GBCA, intravenous administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent; MPRAGE, magnetization prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo.
Discussion
There is increasing interest in the relationship between venous blood flow and EH. In order to improve CCSVI, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the jugular vein has been performed and was effective in 80% of patients. MD, along with glaucoma, is a neurodegenerative disease of the sensory organs. Neurofluidic dynamics have been proposed as an important factor in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases., Venous and interstitial fluid flows are also important components of the glymphatic system, which is the waste clearance mechanism of the central nervous system.,,In the present study, an evaluation of the venous CSA in a static state showed no significant association between EH grades in the cochlea or vestibule for the IJV or IPS. However, the SPS was associated significantly with EH grade. The CSA of the SPS was smaller in ears with significant EH than those without EH in both the cochlea and the vestibule. However, in both the cochlea and the vestibule, there is an overlap in the CSA of the SPS between each EH grade group, making it difficult to use the CSA of the SPS to differentiate individual diagnoses. In the ROC analysis of the cochlea, the AUC for predicting significant EH was 0.8762, and the threshold value was 3.905 mm2. In the vestibule, the AUC for predicting significant EH was 0.7727, with a threshold of 3.805 mm2. The negative predictive value was 0.750 for the cochlear EH but was only 0.323 for the vestibular EH.It cannot be determined from the present results whether the size of the SPS directly reflects the effect of congestion in the inner ear on venous blood drainage, or if it reflects an indirect relationship between the size of the SPS and the development of an unknown specific region of the temporal bone associated with EH. The IPS should also influence the inner ear blood flow drainage, but in the present study, there was no relationship between the CSA of the IPS and the degree of EH. In other words, the relationship between the CSA of the SPS and the degree of EH may be showing an indirect effect by the development of a specific region of the temporal bone rather than a direct effect of inner ear blood flow congestion.To further investigate the results of this study, it is necessary to investigate the distribution of the CSA of the SPS in a healthy cohort in the future. It is also clinically important to investigate whether there is an association between the onset of MD and the fluctuation of the SPS CSA in a prospective study. In addition, a search for temporal bone regions, which are associated with the SPS CSA, may be necessary.Some other morphological features, which may be associated with MD, have already been reported as described below. Visibility of the vestibular aqueduct on CT was reported to be correlated with the presence of EH on the MR images obtained at 4 hours after the GBCA administration. It was reported that the diameter of the medial side of the cochlear aqueduct is narrow in patients with MD. There has been a debate about the significance of high jugular bulbs in the development of EH. In one report, a high jugular bulb was reported to be related to the development of EH. It was suggested that a jugular bulb reaching above the inferior margin of the internal auditory canal could obstruct the vestibular aqueduct, resulting in EH. Alternatively, it was reported that a high jugular bulb is not the cause of EH in patients with MD. Both studies used GBCA-enhanced MRI as the reference for EH. It was also reported that poor development of the air cells around the vestibular aqueduct is not associated with EH.Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome and large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) are reported to be related to a high incidence of EH., Pathologic third window lesions, such as superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome or LVAS, cause several auditory and vestibular symptoms, which might affect the perilymphatic pressure and induce EH. There was a case report indicating that a deep groove in the SPS might have caused superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome and possible EH. The symptoms resolved after plugging the dehiscence through a middle cranial fossa approach. Another report showed that stenting of the SPS significantly decreased the symptoms of superior semicircular canal dehiscence by the SPS.The CSA of the SPS is relatively easy to examine compared to the degree of EH. If we can efficiently predict the future development of EH in patients from small SPS CSA values, we may be able to prevent the onset of MD by early lifestyle changes.The limitations of the present study are as follows. The number of cases was small in this study. Although the agreement between examiners was good, manual measurements of the CSA of the venous structure could be performed automatically in the future. Quantification of EH might be valuable to further elucidate the relationship between EH and SPS CSA.The CSA of the venous structures might be affected by body position and respiratory status, but in the present study, it was only evaluated in a static supine position. The precise flow measurement, including the collateral venous flow, might be necessary to elucidate the relationship between venous congestion and EH; however, we employed static measurement of CSA in the present study. We focused on searching for a surrogate imaging biomarker of EH that could be easily obtained. The static CSA of SPS is relatively easy to obtain and might be a candidate for a surrogate imaging biomarker of EH. As mentioned above, the mechanism of the relationship between the degrees of venous development and EH remains unknown. Since MD progresses over a long period of time, it would be interesting to see if the CSA of the SPS is altered between the early and late stages of MD, but further investigation with a larger number of patients over a longer period is necessary.
Conclusion
The results of this preliminary study showed that there was an association between the degree of EH and the CSA of the SPS, but not that of the IPS or IJV. Further studies are needed to establish the pathophysiological and clinical significance of the present results.
Authors: Tsutomu Nakashima; Ilmari Pyykkö; Megan A Arroll; Margaretha L Casselbrant; Carol A Foster; Nauman F Manzoor; Cliff A Megerian; Shinji Naganawa; Yi-Ho Young Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Giuseppe Attanasio; Luigi Califano; Aldo Bruno; Vincenzo Giugliano; Massimo Ralli; Salvatore Martellucci; Claudia Milella; Marco de Vincentiis; Francesca Y Russo; Antonio Greco Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 3.325