BACKGROUND: To investigate the prognostic role of lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients treated with platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy. METHODS: Data were obtained from two randomized controlled trials (NCT00119613 and NCT00363415). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed according to LIPI score through Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analysis were performed to investigate predictors for OS and PFS. RESULTS: A total of 911 patients with ES-SCLC treated with platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy (CT) were included for analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years, and 760 (83.4%) had performance status of 1 or less. 1-year OS for ES-SCLC with poor, intermediate, and good LIPI was 20%, 30% and 31%, respectively, and 1-year PFS was 7%, 15% and 21%, respectively. Cox-regression analysis showed that the PFS and OS of ES-SCLC with a poor LIPI score was significantly worse than those with good LIPI scores (HR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.38-2.36; p< 0.001 and HR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.07-1.72, p= 0.012), while no significant difference was observed between intermediate and poor LIPI groups in terms of OS (HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.82-1.23, p= 0.82), but not for PFS (HR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.00-1.61, p= 0.048). In addition, LIPI score was significantly associated with disease control rate and objective response rate (both p< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Prognosis of patients with pretreatment LIPI score of 2 is poorer than those with LIPI score of 0-1 among ES-SCLC who received first-line platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy; Further studies are still recommended to confirm our findings in prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: To investigate the prognostic role of lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients treated with platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy. METHODS: Data were obtained from two randomized controlled trials (NCT00119613 and NCT00363415). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed according to LIPI score through Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analysis were performed to investigate predictors for OS and PFS. RESULTS: A total of 911 patients with ES-SCLC treated with platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy (CT) were included for analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years, and 760 (83.4%) had performance status of 1 or less. 1-year OS for ES-SCLC with poor, intermediate, and good LIPI was 20%, 30% and 31%, respectively, and 1-year PFS was 7%, 15% and 21%, respectively. Cox-regression analysis showed that the PFS and OS of ES-SCLC with a poor LIPI score was significantly worse than those with good LIPI scores (HR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.38-2.36; p< 0.001 and HR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.07-1.72, p= 0.012), while no significant difference was observed between intermediate and poor LIPI groups in terms of OS (HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.82-1.23, p= 0.82), but not for PFS (HR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.00-1.61, p= 0.048). In addition, LIPI score was significantly associated with disease control rate and objective response rate (both p< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Prognosis of patients with pretreatment LIPI score of 2 is poorer than those with LIPI score of 0-1 among ES-SCLC who received first-line platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy; Further studies are still recommended to confirm our findings in prospective studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
LIPI score; Small-cell lung cancer; biomarker; prognostic index