Literature DB >> 33896612

Distal femur fractures have a higher mortality rate compared to hip fractures among the elderly: Insights from the National Trauma Data Bank.

Sung Huang Laurent Tsai1, Tung-Yi Lin2, Eric H Tischler3, Kuo-Hsien Hung4, Chien-Hao Chen4, Greg Michael Osgood5, Tsai-Sheng Fu4, Chun-Yi Su4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The comparison of mortality and morbidity between distal femur (DF) and hip fracture in the old age is rarely reported in the literature. We aim to analyze a nationwide database among the elderly to compare the outcomes between hip fractures and distal femur fractures in the United States.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank was queried between 2007-2014 to identify distal femur (DF) and hip fracture patients greater than 65 years of age. Outcomes analyzed included in-hospital mortality, total hospital length of stay(LOS), intensive care unit length of stay(ICU-LOS), length of ventilation use and hospital discharge disposition. Multivariable regression models were performed to adjust for potential confounders. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.001.
RESULTS: 26,325 (10.1%) and 233,213 (89.9%) patients reported a diagnosis of DF and hip fracture, respectively. The inpatient mortality rate was significantly higher in the distal femur fracture group (8.3% vs. 6.7%), with significantly longer LOS (7.87 vs. 6.65), ICU-LOS (1.50 vs. 0.73), and required ventilation days (0.74 vs. 0.27). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that hip fracture patients had a lower mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI [0.76, -0.85]; p < 0.001), shorter LOS ([aOR], -0.31; 95% CI [-0.39, -0.23]; P < 0.001), and more likely to be discharged home ([aOR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85, 0.91; P < 0.001, compared to DF fracture patients.
CONCLUSION: After adjusting for potential factors, DF fracture patients have a significantly higher mortality, longer LOS, and less likely to be discharged home compared to hip fractures among the elderly. These results may suggest clinicians and caregivers for closely monitoring of clinical conditions for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Database; Distal femur fracture; Epidemiology; Hip fracture; Osteoporosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33896612     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  3 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for treating fractures of the distal femur in adults.

Authors:  Henry A Claireaux; Henry Kc Searle; Nick R Parsons; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-05

2.  One-Year Mortality Rates Following Fragility Femoral Fractures in Patients Presenting to King Saud Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Hamid T ALJohani; Ibrahim Alshugair; Shoog F Alfadhel; Elham A Alghamdi; Hussain Alkaff; Bander S Alrashedan; Hussain ALYousif
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-06

3.  Incidence of and risk factors for hip fracture in Nagasaki, Japan from 2005 to 2014.

Authors:  Hironobu Koseki; Shinya Sunagawa; Chieko Noguchi; Akihiko Yonekura; Umi Matsumura; Kaho Watanabe; Yuta Nishiyama; Makoto Osaki
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.617

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.