Literature DB >> 33895601

Understanding relational binding in early childhood: Interacting effects of overlap and delay.

Susan L Benear1, Chi T Ngo2, Ingrid R Olson3, Nora S Newcombe3.   

Abstract

Episodic memories typically share overlapping elements in distinctive combinations, and to be valuable for future behavior they need to withstand delays. There is relatively little work on whether children have special difficulty with overlap or withstanding delay. However, Yim, Dennis, and Sloutsky (Psychological Science, 2013, Vol. 24, pp. 2163-2172) suggested that extensive overlap is more problematic for younger children, and Darby and Sloutsky (Psychological Science, 2015, Vol. 26, pp. 1937-1946) reported that a 48-h delay period actually improves children's memory for overlapping pairs of items. In the current study, we asked how children's episodic memory is affected by stimulus overlap, delay, and age using visual stimuli containing either overlapping or unique item pairs. Children aged 4 and 6 years were tested both immediately and after a 24-h delay. As expected, older children performed better than younger children, and both age groups performed worse on overlapping pairs. Surprisingly, the 24-h delay had only a marginal effect on overall accuracy. Although there were no interactions, when errors were examined, there was evidence that delay buffered memory for overlapping pairs against cross-contextual confusion for younger children.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child development; Cognitive development; Delayed memory; Episodic memory; Memory interference; Relational binding

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33895601      PMCID: PMC8147897          DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  42 in total

1.  Integrated memory for object, place, and context in rats: a possible model of episodic-like memory?

Authors:  Madeline J Eacott; Gillian Norman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sleep shelters verbal memory from different kinds of interference.

Authors:  Bhavin R Sheth; Reni Varghese; Thuy Truong
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Wakefulness (not sleep) promotes generalization of word learning in 2.5-year-old children.

Authors:  Denise M Werchan; Rebecca L Gómez
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-08-20

4.  Sleep spindles in midday naps enhance learning in preschool children.

Authors:  Laura Kurdziel; Kasey Duclos; Rebecca M C Spencer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Memory binding in early childhood: evidence for a retrieval deficit.

Authors:  Marianne E Lloyd; Ayzit O Doydum; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

6.  Shift from hippocampal to neocortical centered retrieval network with consolidation.

Authors:  Atsuko Takashima; Ingrid L C Nieuwenhuis; Ole Jensen; Lucia M Talamini; Mark Rijpkema; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Evidence against a large effect of sleep in protecting verbal memories from interference.

Authors:  Dorothee Pöhlchen; Annedore Pawlizki; Steffen Gais; Monika Schönauer
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.981

8.  Interference effects by spatial proximity and age-related declines in spatial memory by Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata): deficits in the combined use of multiple spatial cues.

Authors:  Namiko Kubo-Kawai; Nobuyuki Kawai
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Development of hippocampal subfield volumes from 4 to 22 years.

Authors:  Stine K Krogsrud; Christian K Tamnes; Anders M Fjell; Inge Amlien; Håkon Grydeland; Unni Sulutvedt; Paulina Due-Tønnessen; Atle Bjørnerud; Anne E Sølsnes; Asta K Håberg; Jon Skrane; Kristine B Walhovd
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Does sleep protect memories against interference? A failure to replicate.

Authors:  Carrie Bailes; Mary Caldwell; Erin J Wamsley; Matthew A Tucker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intraobject and extraobject memory binding across early development.

Authors:  Kevin P Darby; Per B Sederberg; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2022-03-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.