Maria M Rubinstein1, Shannan Dickinson2, Priyanka Narayan3, Qin Zhou4, Alexia Iasonos4, Weining Ma2, Yulia Lakhman2, Vicky Makker5. 1. Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: rubinstm@mskcc.org. 2. Body Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Prospective data have demonstrated the efficacy of bevacizumab monotherapy in the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer. Bevacizumab is used off-label, and real-world data regarding the role of bevacizumab in endometrial cancer treatment are scant. In this largest single-institution retrospective study of its kind, we report our experience with bevacizumab monotherapy in the treatment of advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. METHODS: All eligible patients (n = 101) had histologically confirmed endometrial cancer and were treated with bevacizumab at our institution from 2004 to 2017. Demographic data and tumor characteristics were obtained through chart review. Primary objective was response to therapy determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). RESULTS: Analysis included 13 grade 1/2 endometrioid, 15 grade 3 endometrioid, 44 serous, 8 carcinosarcoma, and 21 other/mixed histologies. No patients achieved complete (CR) or partial (PR) responses; 19 achieved stable disease (SD). The clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR + PR + SD) was 19% (95% CI: 12-28%). The CBRs were 7%, 17%, 21%, and 23% for patients with 1, 2, 3, and ≥ 4 prior treatment lines. Median PFS ranged from 2.6 months (2 lines) to 4.9 months (≥4 lines). The 3-year OS rate was 58% (95% CI: 47-67%). The median OS was 3.4 years (95% CI: 2.9-4.2), ranging from 2.5 years (2 lines) to 4.5 years (≥4 lines). The most common treatment-related adverse event was hypertension; 35 (78%) of 45 were grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: In heavily pretreated advanced endometrial cancer, bevacizumab was associated with modest clinical efficacy and remains a viable palliative option in this setting.
OBJECTIVE: Prospective data have demonstrated the efficacy of bevacizumab monotherapy in the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer. Bevacizumab is used off-label, and real-world data regarding the role of bevacizumab in endometrial cancer treatment are scant. In this largest single-institution retrospective study of its kind, we report our experience with bevacizumab monotherapy in the treatment of advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. METHODS: All eligible patients (n = 101) had histologically confirmed endometrial cancer and were treated with bevacizumab at our institution from 2004 to 2017. Demographic data and tumor characteristics were obtained through chart review. Primary objective was response to therapy determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). RESULTS: Analysis included 13 grade 1/2 endometrioid, 15 grade 3 endometrioid, 44 serous, 8 carcinosarcoma, and 21 other/mixed histologies. No patients achieved complete (CR) or partial (PR) responses; 19 achieved stable disease (SD). The clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR + PR + SD) was 19% (95% CI: 12-28%). The CBRs were 7%, 17%, 21%, and 23% for patients with 1, 2, 3, and ≥ 4 prior treatment lines. Median PFS ranged from 2.6 months (2 lines) to 4.9 months (≥4 lines). The 3-year OS rate was 58% (95% CI: 47-67%). The median OS was 3.4 years (95% CI: 2.9-4.2), ranging from 2.5 years (2 lines) to 4.5 years (≥4 lines). The most common treatment-related adverse event was hypertension; 35 (78%) of 45 were grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: In heavily pretreated advanced endometrial cancer, bevacizumab was associated with modest clinical efficacy and remains a viable palliative option in this setting.
Authors: Carol Aghajanian; Virginia Filiaci; Don S Dizon; Jay W Carlson; Matthew A Powell; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Krishnansu S Tewari; David P Bender; David M O'Malley; Ashley Stuckey; JianJiong Gao; Fanny Dao; Robert A Soslow; Heather A Lankes; Kathleen Moore; Douglas A Levine Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Vicky Makker; Drew Rasco; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Marcia S Brose; Allen L Cohn; James Mier; Christopher Di Simone; David M Hyman; Daniel E Stepan; Corina E Dutcus; Emmett V Schmidt; Matthew Guo; Pallavi Sachdev; Robert Shumaker; Carol Aghajanian; Matthew Taylor Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Robert A Burger; Mark F Brady; Michael A Bookman; Gini F Fleming; Bradley J Monk; Helen Huang; Robert S Mannel; Howard D Homesley; Jeffrey Fowler; Benjamin E Greer; Matthew Boente; Michael J Birrer; Sharon X Liang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Neesha C Dhani; Hal W Hirte; Lisa Wang; Julia V Burnier; Angela Jain; Marcus O Butler; Stephen Welch; Gini F Fleming; Jean Hurteau; Koji Matsuo; Daniela Matei; Waldo Jimenez; Carolyn Johnston; Mihaela Cristea; Katia Tonkin; Prafull Ghatage; Stephanie Lheureux; Anjali Mehta; Judy Quintos; Qian Tan; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Olga Ludkovski; Ming-Sound Tsao; John J Wright; Amit M Oza Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Fiona Simpkins; Richard Drake; Pedro F Escobar; Benjamin Nutter; Nabila Rasool; Peter G Rose Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-12-06 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Bradley J Monk; Michael W Sill; Robert A Burger; Heidi J Gray; Thomas E Buekers; Lynda D Roman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-01-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ignace Vergote; Matthew A Powell; Michael G Teneriello; David S Miller; Agustin A Garcia; Olga N Mikheeva; Mariusz Bidzinski; Cristina Ligia Cebotaru; Corina E Dutcus; Min Ren; Tadashi Kadowaki; Yasuhiro Funahashi; Richard T Penson Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2020-01-17 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Cyriac Kandoth; Nikolaus Schultz; Andrew D Cherniack; Rehan Akbani; Yuexin Liu; Hui Shen; A Gordon Robertson; Itai Pashtan; Ronglai Shen; Christopher C Benz; Christina Yau; Peter W Laird; Li Ding; Wei Zhang; Gordon B Mills; Raju Kucherlapati; Elaine R Mardis; Douglas A Levine Journal: Nature Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 49.962