Literature DB >> 33894605

Environmental impacts and greenhouse gas emissions assessment for energy recovery and material recycle of the wastewater treatment plant.

Thi Kieu Loan Nguyen1, Huu Hao Ngo2, Wenshan Guo1, Thuy Le Hong Nguyen1, Soon Woong Chang3, Dinh Duc Nguyen4, Sunita Varjani5, Zhongfang Lei6, Lijuan Deng1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the environmental burdens concerning the recycling/recovery process of a wastewater treatment plant's construction material waste and biogas. Detailed data inventories of case studies were employed in several scenarios to explore the role of end-of-life treatment methods. The ReCiPe 2016 and the Greenhouse gas Protocol life cycle impact methods were conducted to measure the impact categories. The construction and demolition phases were considered for recycling potential assessment, while the operational phase was examined for assessing the advantages of energy recovery. Metal and concrete recycling show environmental benefits. Increasing the reprocessing rate requires more water consumption but results in: firstly, a decrease of 18.8% in total damage; secondly, reduces problematic mineral scarcity by 3.9%; and thirdly, a shortfall in fossil fuels amounting to 11.6%. Recycling concrete helps to reduce the amount of GHG emissions 1.4-fold. Different biogas treatment methods contribute to various outcomes. Biogas utilization for on-site energy purposes has more advantages than flaring and offsite consumption. Electricity and heat generation originating from biogas can provide 70% of the energy requirement and replace 100% natural gas usage. Biomethane production from biogas requires extreme power and more resources. Meanwhile, producing heat and electricity can offset 102.9 g of fossil CO2, and manufacturing biomethane contributes the equivalent of 101.2 g of fossil fuel-derived CO2. Reducing 10% of recovered electricity creation could rise 19.19% global warming indicator of the wastewater treatment plant.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energy recovery; Environmental impacts; Life cycle assessment; Materials; Recycle; Wastewater treatment plant

Year:  2021        PMID: 33894605     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  Anaerobic Digested Wastewater CO2 Sequestration Using a Biophotocatalytic System with a Magnetized Photocatalyst (Fe-TiO2).

Authors:  Emmanuel Kweinor Tetteh; Gloria Amo-Duodu; Sudesh Rathilal
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  Response Surface Optimization of Biophotocatalytic Degradation of Industrial Wastewater for Bioenergy Recovery.

Authors:  Emmanuel Kweinor Tetteh; Sudesh Rathilal
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-26

Review 3.  Recovery of resources from industrial wastewater employing electrochemical technologies: status, advancements and perspectives.

Authors:  Viralkunvar Devda; Kashika Chaudhary; Sunita Varjani; Bhawana Pathak; Anil Kumar Patel; Reeta Rani Singhania; Mohammad J Taherzadeh; Huu Hao Ngo; Jonathan W C Wong; Wenshan Guo; Preeti Chaturvedi
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.