Jeffrey A Bogart1, Xiaofei Wang2, Gregory A Masters3, Junheng Gao2, Ritsuko Komaki4, Laurie E Gaspar5, John V Heymach6, Michael Christian Dobelbower7, Charles Kuzma8, Thomas E Stinchcombe9, Everett E Vokes10. 1. State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States. Electronic address: bogartj@upstate.edu. 2. Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. 3. Helen Graham Cancer Center, Newark, DE, United States. 4. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States. 5. Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Greeley, CO, United States. 6. MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States. 7. University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, United States. 8. FirstHealth of the Carolinas-Moore Regional Hospital, Pinehurst, NC, United States. 9. Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States. 10. University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538 randomized trial was designed to test whether high-dose thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) would improve survival compared with 45 Gy twice-daily (BID) TRT in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC). Two piloted experimental TRT regimens were of interest to study, 70 Gy daily (QD) and 61.2 Gy concomitant boost (CB). Driven by concerns about adequate patient accrual, a study design was employed that eliminated one experimental TRT arm based on early interim toxicity and tolerability, with the study then continuing as a traditional 2-arm phase III study. METHODS: Patients with LSCLC were assigned to receive four cycles of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy with one of 3 TRT regimens starting with either the first or second cycle of chemotherapy. The interim endpoint was the cumulative highest toxicity calculated from a scoring system based on treatment-related grade 3 and higher toxicity and the ability to complete therapy in the experimental arms. RESULTS: The final interim analysis was performed after 70 patients accrued to each experimental cohort, and a difference in treatment related toxicity scoring was not found (p = 0.739). Severe esophageal toxicity was comparable in both cohorts. Pulmonary toxicity was low overall, though 4 patients (5.7 %) on the 61.2 Gy arm developed grade 4 dyspnea, which was not observed in the 70 Gy arm. A protocol mandated decision was made to discontinue the 61.2 Gy arm following review of toxicity with the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. CONCLUSION: A randomized trial design using a planned early interim toxicity analysis to discriminate between experimental treatment arms is feasible in a phase III setting. Refinement of the design could increase the likelihood of detecting clinically meaningful differences in toxicity in future studies.
INTRODUCTION: The CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538 randomized trial was designed to test whether high-dose thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) would improve survival compared with 45 Gy twice-daily (BID) TRT in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC). Two piloted experimental TRT regimens were of interest to study, 70 Gy daily (QD) and 61.2 Gy concomitant boost (CB). Driven by concerns about adequate patient accrual, a study design was employed that eliminated one experimental TRT arm based on early interim toxicity and tolerability, with the study then continuing as a traditional 2-arm phase III study. METHODS: Patients with LSCLC were assigned to receive four cycles of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy with one of 3 TRT regimens starting with either the first or second cycle of chemotherapy. The interim endpoint was the cumulative highest toxicity calculated from a scoring system based on treatment-related grade 3 and higher toxicity and the ability to complete therapy in the experimental arms. RESULTS: The final interim analysis was performed after 70 patients accrued to each experimental cohort, and a difference in treatment related toxicity scoring was not found (p = 0.739). Severe esophageal toxicity was comparable in both cohorts. Pulmonary toxicity was low overall, though 4 patients (5.7 %) on the 61.2 Gy arm developed grade 4 dyspnea, which was not observed in the 70 Gy arm. A protocol mandated decision was made to discontinue the 61.2 Gy arm following review of toxicity with the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. CONCLUSION: A randomized trial design using a planned early interim toxicity analysis to discriminate between experimental treatment arms is feasible in a phase III setting. Refinement of the design could increase the likelihood of detecting clinically meaningful differences in toxicity in future studies.
Authors: Jeffrey A Bogart; James E Herndon; Alan P Lyss; Dorothy Watson; Antonius A Miller; Michael E Lee; Andrew T Turrisi; Mark R Green Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A T Turrisi; K Kim; R Blum; W T Sause; R B Livingston; R Komaki; H Wagner; S Aisner; D H Johnson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-01-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew J Farrell; Jehan B Yahya; Catherine Degnin; Yiyi Chen; John M Holland; Mark A Henderson; Jerry J Jaboin; Matthew M Harkenrider; Charles R Thomas; Timur Mitin Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Stephen G Chun; Chen Hu; Hak Choy; Ritsuko U Komaki; Robert D Timmerman; Steven E Schild; Jeffrey A Bogart; Michael C Dobelbower; Walter Bosch; James M Galvin; Vivek S Kavadi; Samir Narayan; Puneeth Iyengar; Clifford G Robinson; Raymond B Wynn; Adam Raben; Mark E Augspurger; Robert M MacRae; Rebecca Paulus; Jeffrey D Bradley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ritsuko Komaki; Rebecca Paulus; David S Ettinger; Gregory M M Videtic; Jeffrey D Bradley; Bonnie S Glisson; Corey J Langer; William T Sause; Walter J Curran; Hak Choy Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-05-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Corinne Faivre-Finn; Michael Snee; Linda Ashcroft; Wiebke Appel; Fabrice Barlesi; Adityanarayan Bhatnagar; Andrea Bezjak; Felipe Cardenal; Pierre Fournel; Susan Harden; Cecile Le Pechoux; Rhona McMenemin; Nazia Mohammed; Mary O'Brien; Jason Pantarotto; Veerle Surmont; Jan P Van Meerbeeck; Penella J Woll; Paul Lorigan; Fiona Blackhall Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Alexandra Thomas; Kristin A Higgins; Nancy Soto; Rebecca Paulus; Thomas J George; Thomas B Julian; Sharon Hartson Stine; Merry Jennifer Markham; Maria Werner-Wasik Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2022-08-25