| Literature DB >> 33893872 |
Austin Carpenter1, Mitchell Rock1, Ehsan Dowlati2, Charles Miller3, Jeffrey C Mai4,5, Ai-Hsi Liu6, Rocco A Armonda4,5, Daniel R Felbaum4,5.
Abstract
Optimal treatment for chronic subdural hematomas remains controversial and perioperative risks and comorbidities may affect management strategies. Minimally invasive procedures are emerging as alternatives to the standard operative treatments. We evaluate our experience with middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization combined with Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS) placement as a first-line treatment for patients with cSDH. A single institution retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing intervention. Patients were stratified by treatment with MMA embolization and SEPS placement, MMA embolization and surgery, SEPS placement only, and surgery only for cSDH from 2017 to 2020, and cohorts were compared against each other. Patients treated with MMA/SEPS were more likely to be older, be on anticoagulation, have significant comorbidities, have shorter length of stay, and less likely to have symptomatic recurrence compared to SEPS only cohort. Thus, MMA/SEPS appears to be a safe and equally effective minimally invasive treatment for cSDH patients with significant comorbidities who are poor surgical candidates.Entities:
Keywords: Craniostomy; Embolization; Middle meningeal artery; SEPS; Subdural hematoma
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33893872 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01553-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurosurg Rev ISSN: 0344-5607 Impact factor: 2.800