Literature DB >> 3389364

The risk of miscarriage and birth defects among women who use visual display terminals during pregnancy.

M K Goldhaber1, M R Polen, R A Hiatt.   

Abstract

Use of visual display terminals (VDTs) was examined in a case-control study of pregnancy outcome among 1,583 pregnant women who attended three Kaiser Permanente obstetrics and gynecology clinics in Northern California, 1981-1982. We found a significantly elevated risk of miscarriage for working women who reported using VDTs for more than 20 hr per week during the first trimester of pregnancy compared to other working women who reported not using VDTs (odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-2.8). This risk could not be explained by age, education, occupation, smoking, alcohol consumption, or other maternal characteristics. No significantly elevated risk for birth defects was found among working women although odds ratios were 1.4 for both moderate and high VDT exposure, compared with no exposure (95% CI: 0.7-2.7 and 0.7-2.9, respectively). One possible explanation for these findings is that women who had adverse pregnancy outcomes may have overreported their exposures to VDTs and/or women with normal births may have underreported theirs. The findings may also be due to unmeasured factors confounded with high VDT use such as poor ergonomic conditions or job-related stress. That VDTs themselves are hazardous to the pregnant operator remains a possibility. Our results underscore the need for large cohort studies of working women that will provide objective measures of VDT exposures, ergonomic factors, and stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3389364     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700130608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  19 in total

Review 1.  Possible health effects of working with VDUs.

Authors:  U Bergqvist
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1989-04

2.  Cardiovascular malformations and maternal exposure to video display terminals during pregnancy.

Authors:  J Tikkanen; O P Heinonen; K Kurppa; K Rantala
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Analysis of pregnancy-related calls to an occupational hazard hot line.

Authors:  C Wright; J Quint
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-12

4.  Fetal death ratios in a prospective study compared to state fetal death certificate reporting.

Authors:  M K Goldhaber
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Caffeinated beverages and low birthweight: a case-control study.

Authors:  B J Caan; M K Goldhaber
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Spontaneous abortion and work with visual display units.

Authors:  E Roman; V Beral; M Pelerin; C Hermon
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1992-07

Review 7.  Pregnant workers. A physician's guide to assessing safe employment.

Authors:  J S Feinberg; C R Kelley
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-02

8.  Video display terminal use during pregnancy and reproductive outcome--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Parazzini; L Luchini; C La Vecchia; P G Crosignani
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 9.  Exposure to Power-Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Infertility and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Update on the Human Evidence and Recommendations for Future Study Designs.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Andrew D Maynard; Richard L Neitzel; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.393

10.  Temporal variability of daily personal magnetic field exposure metrics in pregnant women.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Kelly R Evenson; David A Savitz; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.