| Literature DB >> 33893579 |
Dilek Çavuşoğlu1, Tuğçe Kalefetoğlu Macar2, Oksal Macar3, Emine Yalçın4, Kültiğin Çavuşoğlu4.
Abstract
UV-C exposure has become a crucial risk for living organisms due to its widespread use in sterilization. In this study, the mitigating potential of lycopene was investigated against UV-C-mediated toxicity in Allium cepa L. roots. Allium bulbs were separated into six groups which treated with tap water, 215 mg/L lycopene, 430 mg/L lycopene, 254-nm UV radiation, 215 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation, and 430 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation. Germination percentage, root length, weight gain, mitotic index, micronucleus frequency, and other chromosomal aberrations as well as meristematic cell damages were investigated in all groups. Malondialdehyde level and the activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase enzymes were also analyzed to understand the severity of oxidative stress. UV-C radiation was revealed to negatively affect all parameters investigated, while the mitigating activities of lycopene against UV-C-mediated toxicity were dose-dependent. Therefore, the study evidently demonstrated the promising potential of lycopene in the protection against the detrimental effects of UV-C exposure in A. cepa.Entities:
Keywords: Allium cepa; Genotoxicity; Lycopene; Meristematic cell damages; Oxidative stress; UV radiation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33893579 PMCID: PMC8064420 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14047-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Effects of UV-C and lycopene on physiological parameters
| Groups* | Germination percentage ( | Root length ( | Weight gain ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | 100 | 6.74±1.28a | +4.50a (5.00±1.46–9.50±2.68) |
| G2 | 100 | 6.80±1.30a | +4.62a (5.12±1.48–9.74±2.71) |
| G3 | 100 | 6.86±1.32a | +4.70a (4.97±1.42–9.67±2.66) |
| G4 | 63 | 0.75±0.46d | +0.63d (5.15±1.50–5.78±1.60) |
| G5 | 71 | 1.60±0.88c | +1.53c (5.10±1.46–6.63±1.69) |
| G6 | 80 | 3.90±1.13b | +2.84b (4.99±1.44–7.83±2.15) |
*G1, control; G2, 215 mg/L lycopene; G3, 430 mg/L lycopene; G4, 254-nm UV radiation; G5, 215 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation; G6, 430 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation. The means shown with different letters (a–d) in the same column were considered as significant at p <0.05
Protective role of lycopene against UV-C-induced genotoxicity
| Aberrations | G1 | G2 | G3 | G4 | G5 | G6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | 795.60±24.30a | 812.40±27.38a | 809.64±25.77a | 428.80±14.52d | 495.30±16.78c | 554.60±18.25b |
| MN | 0.54±0.72d | 0.48±0.56d | 0.28±0.36d | 42.70±5.36a | 35.20±4.74b | 29.50±4.12c |
| FRG | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 60.40±7.72a | 52.10±7.13b | 44.90±6.38c |
| VC | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 48.60±6.75a | 40.10±5.77b | 33.40±4.97c |
| SC | 0.32±0.44d | 0.18±0.26d | 0.00±0.00d | 40.20±4.98a | 33.70±4.23b | 27.80±3.59c |
| B | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 32.80±3.24a | 26.90±2.78b | 20.30±2.55c |
| UDC | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 26.10±2.88a | 21.40±2.61b | 17.30±1.97c |
| MA | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 19.70±1.83a | 13.80±1.54b | 8.20±1.22c |
| VN | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 12.80±1.26a | 8.40±0.84b | 3.90±0.64c |
G1, control; G2, 215 mg/L lycopene; G3, 430 mg/L lycopene; G4, 254-nm UV radiation; G5, 215 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation; G6, 430 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation. The means (n=10) shown with different letters (a–d) in the same line were considered as significant at p <0.05. MI mitotic index, MN micronucleus, FRG fragment, VC vagrant chromosome, SC sticky chromosome, B bridge, UDC unequal distribution of chromatin, MA multipolar anaphase, VN vacuole nucleus
Fig. 1Chromosomal aberrations induced by UV-C radiation (a MN at interphase, b fragment at anaphase, c vagrant chromosome at telophase, d vagrant chromosome at anaphase, e sticky chromosome, f bridge at anaphase (dotted arrows) and vagrant chromosome (straight arrows), g unequal distribution of chromatin, h multipolar anaphase, ı vacuole nucleus)
Effects of UV-C and lycopene on biochemical parameters
| Groups* | MDA | SOD | CAT |
|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | 8.70±1.86d | 90.40±7.16d | 0.36±0.78d |
| G2 | 8.50±1.84d | 91.50±7.24d | 0.34±0.76d |
| G3 | 8.60±1.82d | 88.30±7.12d | 0.35±0.75d |
| G4 | 30.40±3.27a | 248.60±15.66a | 0.96±1.16a |
| G5 | 22.30±2.94b | 196.20±13.58b | 0.75±0.96b |
| G6 | 14.80±2.15c | 146.90±10.75c | 0.58±0.84c |
*G1, control; G2, 215 mg/L lycopene; G3, 430 mg/L lycopene; G4, 254-nm UV radiation; G5, 215 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation; G6, 430 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation. The means shown with different letters (a–d) in the same column were considered as significant at p <0.05
Protective role of lycopene against UV-C-induced meristematic cell damages
| Groups | Damages* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECD | N | GCN | CCD | ITT | |
| G1 | |||||
| G2 | |||||
| G3 | |||||
| G4 | |||||
| G5 | |||||
| G6 | |||||
G1, control; G2, 215 mg/L lycopene; G3, 430 mg/L lycopene; G4, 254-nm UV radiation; G5, 215 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation; G6, 430 mg/L lycopene + 254-nm UV radiation. *ECD epidermis cell damage, N necrosis, GCN giant cell nucleus, CCD cortex cell damage, ITT indistinct transmission tissue. (−) no damage, (+) slight damage, (++) moderate damage, (+++) severe damage
Fig. 2Meristematic cell damages induced by UV-C administration (a normal appearance of epidermis cells, b normal appearance of cell nucleus (oval), c normal appearance of cortex cells, d normal appearance of transmission tissue, e epidermis cell damage, f necrotic areas (black arrow), giant cell nucleus (white arrow), g cortex cell damage, h indistinct appearance of transmission tissue)