Literature DB >> 33893543

Non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography/venography techniques: what are my options?

Jacob B Fleecs1, Nathan S Artz1,2, Grace S Mitchell1,2, Sherwin S Chan3,4.   

Abstract

Non-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and MR venography techniques are gaining popularity for vascular imaging because they are faster, more forgiving and less costly compared with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Non-contrast MR angiography also avoids gadolinium deposition, which is especially important in imaging children. Non-contrast MR angiography has an array of specific applications for numerous clinical indications. This review summarizes the non-contrast MR angiography methods and their relative advantages and disadvantages. The paper also guides the reader on which technique to consider when determining the optimal imaging modality for each individual patient.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Magnetic resonance angiography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance venography; Non-contrast; Signal-to-noise ratio; Technique; Vasculature

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33893543     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05067-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  1 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric magnetic resonance angiography: to contrast or not to contrast.

Authors:  Erin K Opfer; Nathan S Artz; Grace S Mitchell; Sherwin S Chan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-08-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.