Literature DB >> 33892937

Endorsement of the OMERACT core domain set for shared decision making interventions in rheumatology trials: Results from a multi-stepped consensus-building approach.

Karine Toupin-April1, Simon Décary2, Maarten de Wit3, Alexa Meara4, Jennifer L Barton5, Liana Fraenkel6, Linda C Li7, Peter Brooks8, Beverly Shea9, Dawn Stacey10, France Légaré11, Anne Lydiatt12, Cathie Hofstetter12, Laurie Proulx13, Robin Christensen14, Marieke Voshaar15, Maria E Suarez-Almazor16, Annelies Boonen17, Tanya Meade18, Lyn March19, Janet Elizabeth Jull20, Willemina Campbell21, Rieke Alten22, Esi M Morgan23, Ayano Kelly24, Jessica Kaufman25, Sophie Hill25, Lara J Maxwell26, Francis Guillemin27, Dorcas Beaton28, Yasser El-Miedany29, Shikha Mittoo30, Tiffany Westrich Robertson31, Susan J Bartlett32, Jasvinder A Singh33, Melissa Mannion34, Samah Ismail Nasef35, Savia de Souza36, Anne Boel37, Adewale Adebajo38, Laurent Arnaud39, Tiffany K Gill40, Ellen Moholt41, Jennifer Burt42, Arundathi Jayatilleke43, Ihsane Hmamouchi44, David Carrott45, Francisco J Blanco46, Kate Mather47, Ajesh Maharaj48, Saurab Sharma49, Francesco Caso50, Christopher Fong51, Anthony P Fernandez52, Sarah Mackie53, Elena Nikiphorou54, Allyson Jones55, Regina Greer-Smith56, Victor S Sloan57, Akpabio Akpabio58, Vibeke Strand59, Valerie Umaefulam60, Sara Monti61, Charmaine Melburn62, Nouran Abaza63, Kirsten Schultz64, Simon Stones65, Sonam Kiwalkar66, Hemalatha Srinivasalu67, Deb Constien68, Lauren K King69, Peter Tugwell70.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To gain consensus on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) core domain set for rheumatology trials of shared decision making (SDM) interventions.
METHODS: The process followed the OMERACT Filter 2.1 methodology, and used consensus-building methods, with patients involved since the inception. After developing the draft core domain set in previous research, we conducted five steps: (i) improving the draft core domain set; (ii) developing and disseminating white-board videos to promote its understanding; (iii) conducting an electronic survey to gather feedback on the draft core domain set; (iv) finalizing the core domain set and developing summaries, a plenary session video and discussion boards to promote its understanding; and (v) conducting virtual workshops with voting to endorse the core domain set.
RESULTS: A total of 167 participants from 28 countries answered the survey (62% were patients/caregivers). Most participants rated domains as relevant (81%-95%) and clear (82%-93%). A total of 149 participants (n = 48 patients/caregivers, 101 clinicians/researchers) participated in virtual workshops and voted on the proposed core domain set which received endorsement by 95%. Endorsed domains are: 1- Knowledge of options, their potential benefits and harms; 2- Chosen option aligned with each patient's values and preferences; 3- Confidence in the chosen option; 4- Satisfaction with the decision-making process; 5- Adherence to the chosen option and 6- Potential negative consequences of the SDM intervention.
CONCLUSION: We achieved consensus among an international group of stakeholders on the OMERACT core domain set for rheumatology trials of SDM interventions. Future research will develop the Core Outcome Measurement Set. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Prior to this study, there had been no consensus on the OMERACT core domain set for SDM interventions. The current study shows that the OMERACT core domain set achieved a high level of endorsement by key stakeholders, including patients/caregivers, clinicians and researchers.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core domain set; OMERACT; Shared decision making

Year:  2021        PMID: 33892937     DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0049-0172            Impact factor:   5.532


  3 in total

1.  Decision aids linked to the recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: results of the acceptability of a decision aid for patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Vanesa Ramos-García; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez; Amado Rivero-Santana; Wenceslao Peñate-Castro; Andrea Duarte-Díaz; Yolanda Álvarez-Pérez; María Del Mar Trujillo-Martín; María Isabel Del Cura-González; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.298

2.  Improving patient pathways for systemic lupus erythematosus: a multistakeholder pathway optimisation study.

Authors:  Aurelien Schlencker; Laurent Messer; Marc Ardizzone; Gilles Blaison; Olivier Hinschberger; Etienne Dahan; Christelle Sordet; Julia Walther; Anne Dory; Maria Gonzalez; Stéphanie Kleinlogel; Aurélia Bramont-Nachman; Lionel Barrand; Isabelle Payen-Revol; Jean Sibilia; Thierry Martin; Laurent Arnaud
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2022-05

Review 3.  Big data analyses and individual health profiling in the arena of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).

Authors:  Diederik De Cock; Elena Myasoedova; Daniel Aletaha; Paul Studenic
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.625

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.