Literature DB >> 33891694

Estimation of the increased risk associated with recurrent events or polyvascular atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the United Kingdom.

Mark D Danese1, Peter Pemberton-Ross2, David Catterick3, Guillermo Villa2.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aims of this study were to re-estimate the international REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) risk equation using United Kingdom data and to distinguish different relative hazards for specific atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event histories. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients in the UK Clinical Research Practice Datalink (CPRD) were included as of 1 January 2005 if they were 40 years or older, had 2 or more years of prior data, received one or more moderate or high-intensity statin in the previous year, and had a history of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or other atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were followed until a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or cardiovascular death, loss to follow-up, or end of observation. We re-estimated the REACH risk equation hazard ratios (HRs) using CPRD data (re-estimated REACH model). Our event history model replaced the REACH vascular bed variables with more specific event histories. There were 60,838 patients with 5.25 years of mean follow-up. In the validation model, HRs were in the same direction, and generally greater than REACH. In the event history model, HRs compared to other atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease alone included: recurrent myocardial infarction (HR 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.34), recurrent ischemic stroke (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.03-1.80), myocardial infarction and other atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.23-1.38), ischemic stroke and other atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.23-1.60), myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.23-3.04), and myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke and other atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.47-2.54).
CONCLUSION: A detailed cardiovascular event history may be useful for estimating the relative risk of future cardiovascular events. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease; lipid-lowering therapy; risk prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33891694     DOI: 10.1177/2047487319899212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  3 in total

Review 1.  Current Perspectives on the Attainment of Lipid Modification Goals Relating to the Use of Statins and Ezetimibe for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Timothy Mark Reynolds; Alison Pottle; Sadat H Quoraishi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2021-05-21

2.  Cost-effectiveness of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibition with evolocumab in patients with a history of myocardial infarction in Sweden.

Authors:  Ulf Landmesser; Peter Lindgren; Emil Hagström; Ben van Hout; Guillermo Villa; Peter Pemberton-Ross; Jorge Arellano; Maria Eriksson Svensson; Mahendra Sibartie; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2022-01-05

3.  Cardiovascular Event Rates After Myocardial Infarction or Ischaemic Stroke in Patients with Additional Risk Factors: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Emil Hagström; Francesc Sorio Vilela; Maria K Svensson; Sara Hallberg; Emma Söreskog; Guillermo Villa
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.070

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.