Literature DB >> 33891127

Reply to: The challenge of cardiac dose constraint adaptation to hypofractionated breast radiotherapy in clinical practice.

Marc D Piroth1, David Krug2, Gerd Fastner3, Felix Sedlmayer3, Wilfried Budach4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33891127      PMCID: PMC8154799          DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01775-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


× No keyword cloud information.
We thank Dr. Loap and Dr. Kirova for their thoughtful comments. In principle, we can support the comments. We agree that with ultra-hypofractionation, such as the regimens tested in the FAST and FAST-Forward trials [1, 2], caution should be exercised with regard to cardiac constraints. The recommended dose constraints [3] cannot simply be adopted for ultra-hypofractionation in the case of breast cancer radiotherapy. The FAST-Forward trial protocol recommended to keep the volume of the heart receiving 7 Gy (Gray) and 1.5 Gy to less than 5% and less than 30%, respectively. So far, only 6‑year data are available for the FAST-Forward trial with regard to cardiac toxicity. This is too early to be able to make reliable recommendations regarding cardiac side effects. For moderate hypofractionation with 15–16 fractions of 2.6–2.7 Gy, we refer to the detailed calculations and conclusions of Appelt et al. [4]. The authors showed that moderate hypofractionation results in a lower radiogenic burden on heart structures as compared to conventional fractionation. In our opinion the calculations previously published by Loap et al. [5] are in line with the results from Appelt et al. Also, long-term data from trials with moderate hypofractionation [6, 7] demonstrate that no increased cardiac toxicity is to be expected [8]. The need for caution with regard to ultra-hypofractionation and adoption of cardiac constraints is illustrated in Fig. 1. For different fractionation regimens and assuming a mean heart dose of 3 Gy, the alpha/beta values are plotted against equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions (EQD2). It is shown that the graphs are almost congruent for normofractionation and moderate hypofractionation, corresponding to a comparable biological equivalent mean heart dose. By contrast, the graph representing the ultra-hypofractionation shows higher equivalent mean heart doses for all alpha/beta values.
Fig. 1

Equivalent dose on 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) for different fractionation regimens depending on several alpha/beta values assuming a mean herat dose of 3 Gy

Equivalent dose on 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) for different fractionation regimens depending on several alpha/beta values assuming a mean herat dose of 3 Gy In summary, if adjusted to EQD2 within the alpha/beta model, we consider it well justifiable to recommend our published cardiac dose constraints for moderately hypofractionated regimens. However, especially if ultra-hypofractionation is used, due to an unknown degree of biological uncertainty and due to the short follow-up, further scientific work is essential to draw definite conclusions.
  8 in total

1.  Modern hypofractionation schedules for tangential whole breast irradiation decrease the fraction size-corrected dose to the heart.

Authors:  A L Appelt; I R Vogelius; S M Bentzen
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 4.126

2.  The Limits of the Linear Quadratic (LQ) Model for Late Cardiotoxicity Prediction: Example of Hypofractionated Rotational Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Pierre Loap; Alain Fourquet; Youlia Kirova
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Whelan; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Mark N Levine; Jim A Julian; Robert MacKenzie; Sameer Parpia; Wendy Shelley; Laval Grimard; Julie Bowen; Himu Lukka; Francisco Perera; Anthony Fyles; Ken Schneider; Sunil Gulavita; Carolyn Freeman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Joanne S Haviland; J Roger Owen; John A Dewar; Rajiv K Agrawal; Jane Barrett; Peter J Barrett-Lee; H Jane Dobbs; Penelope Hopwood; Pat A Lawton; Brian J Magee; Judith Mills; Sandra Simmons; Mark A Sydenham; Karen Venables; Judith M Bliss; John R Yarnold
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 5.  Heart toxicity from breast cancer radiotherapy : Current findings, assessment, and prevention.

Authors:  Marc D Piroth; René Baumann; Wilfried Budach; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; Thomas Hehr; David Krug; Arnd Röser; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Frederik Wenz; Rolf Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Ten-Year Results of FAST: A Randomized Controlled Trial of 5-Fraction Whole-Breast Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Adrian Murray Brunt; Joanne S Haviland; Mark Sydenham; Rajiv K Agrawal; Hafiz Algurafi; Abdulla Alhasso; Peter Barrett-Lee; Peter Bliss; David Bloomfield; Joanna Bowen; Ellen Donovan; Andy Goodman; Adrian Harnett; Martin Hogg; Sri Kumar; Helen Passant; Mary Quigley; Liz Sherwin; Alan Stewart; Isabel Syndikus; Jean Tremlett; Yat Tsang; Karen Venables; Duncan Wheatley; Judith M Bliss; John R Yarnold
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Fraction size in radiation therapy for breast conservation in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Brigid E Hickey; Melissa L James; Margot Lehman; Phil N Hider; Mark Jeffery; Daniel P Francis; Adrienne M See
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-18

8.  Hypofractionated breast radiotherapy for 1 week versus 3 weeks (FAST-Forward): 5-year efficacy and late normal tissue effects results from a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Adrian Murray Brunt; Joanne S Haviland; Duncan A Wheatley; Mark A Sydenham; Abdulla Alhasso; David J Bloomfield; Charlie Chan; Mark Churn; Susan Cleator; Charlotte E Coles; Andrew Goodman; Adrian Harnett; Penelope Hopwood; Anna M Kirby; Cliona C Kirwan; Carolyn Morris; Zohal Nabi; Elinor Sawyer; Navita Somaiah; Liba Stones; Isabel Syndikus; Judith M Bliss; John R Yarnold
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 202.731

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.