Marc D Piroth1, David Krug2, Gerd Fastner3, Felix Sedlmayer3, Wilfried Budach4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstraße 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany. marc.piroth@helios-gesundheit.de. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich-Heine-University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany.
We thank Dr. Loap and Dr. Kirova for their thoughtful comments. In principle, we can support the comments. We agree that with ultra-hypofractionation, such as the regimens tested in the FAST and FAST-Forward trials [1, 2], caution should be exercised with regard to cardiac constraints. The recommended dose constraints [3] cannot simply be adopted for ultra-hypofractionation in the case of breast cancer radiotherapy. The FAST-Forward trial protocol recommended to keep the volume of the heart receiving 7 Gy (Gray) and 1.5 Gy to less than 5% and less than 30%, respectively. So far, only 6‑year data are available for the FAST-Forward trial with regard to cardiac toxicity. This is too early to be able to make reliable recommendations regarding cardiac side effects.For moderate hypofractionation with 15–16 fractions of 2.6–2.7 Gy, we refer to the detailed calculations and conclusions of Appelt et al. [4]. The authors showed that moderate hypofractionation results in a lower radiogenic burden on heart structures as compared to conventional fractionation. In our opinion the calculations previously published by Loap et al. [5] are in line with the results from Appelt et al. Also, long-term data from trials with moderate hypofractionation [6, 7] demonstrate that no increased cardiac toxicity is to be expected [8].The need for caution with regard to ultra-hypofractionation and adoption of cardiac constraints is illustrated in Fig. 1. For different fractionation regimens and assuming a mean heart dose of 3 Gy, the alpha/beta values are plotted against equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions (EQD2). It is shown that the graphs are almost congruent for normofractionation and moderate hypofractionation, corresponding to a comparable biological equivalent mean heart dose. By contrast, the graph representing the ultra-hypofractionation shows higher equivalent mean heart doses for all alpha/beta values.
Fig. 1
Equivalent dose on 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) for different fractionation regimens depending on several alpha/beta values assuming a mean herat dose of 3 Gy
Equivalent dose on 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) for different fractionation regimens depending on several alpha/beta values assuming a mean herat dose of 3 GyIn summary, if adjusted to EQD2 within the alpha/beta model, we consider it well justifiable to recommend our published cardiac dose constraints for moderately hypofractionated regimens. However, especially if ultra-hypofractionation is used, due to an unknown degree of biological uncertainty and due to the short follow-up, further scientific work is essential to draw definite conclusions.
Authors: Timothy J Whelan; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Mark N Levine; Jim A Julian; Robert MacKenzie; Sameer Parpia; Wendy Shelley; Laval Grimard; Julie Bowen; Himu Lukka; Francisco Perera; Anthony Fyles; Ken Schneider; Sunil Gulavita; Carolyn Freeman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joanne S Haviland; J Roger Owen; John A Dewar; Rajiv K Agrawal; Jane Barrett; Peter J Barrett-Lee; H Jane Dobbs; Penelope Hopwood; Pat A Lawton; Brian J Magee; Judith Mills; Sandra Simmons; Mark A Sydenham; Karen Venables; Judith M Bliss; John R Yarnold Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Marc D Piroth; René Baumann; Wilfried Budach; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; Thomas Hehr; David Krug; Arnd Röser; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Frederik Wenz; Rolf Sauer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Adrian Murray Brunt; Joanne S Haviland; Mark Sydenham; Rajiv K Agrawal; Hafiz Algurafi; Abdulla Alhasso; Peter Barrett-Lee; Peter Bliss; David Bloomfield; Joanna Bowen; Ellen Donovan; Andy Goodman; Adrian Harnett; Martin Hogg; Sri Kumar; Helen Passant; Mary Quigley; Liz Sherwin; Alan Stewart; Isabel Syndikus; Jean Tremlett; Yat Tsang; Karen Venables; Duncan Wheatley; Judith M Bliss; John R Yarnold Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Brigid E Hickey; Melissa L James; Margot Lehman; Phil N Hider; Mark Jeffery; Daniel P Francis; Adrienne M See Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-07-18
Authors: Adrian Murray Brunt; Joanne S Haviland; Duncan A Wheatley; Mark A Sydenham; Abdulla Alhasso; David J Bloomfield; Charlie Chan; Mark Churn; Susan Cleator; Charlotte E Coles; Andrew Goodman; Adrian Harnett; Penelope Hopwood; Anna M Kirby; Cliona C Kirwan; Carolyn Morris; Zohal Nabi; Elinor Sawyer; Navita Somaiah; Liba Stones; Isabel Syndikus; Judith M Bliss; John R Yarnold Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 202.731