| Literature DB >> 33890903 |
Jens U Berli1, Stan Monstrey1, Bauback Safa1, Mang Chen1.
Abstract
SUMMARY: The creation of a sensate, aesthetic, and functional phallus for transmasculine individuals has high reported complication rates. Neourethra reconstruction is the most challenging aspect of this surgery, with widely varying techniques and staging between providers. In an operation of this complexity, surgeons should not be expected to offer all the options, but rather the specific variation that works in their given setting. For some, it is single-stage phalloplasty with full-length urethroplasty. For others, staged phalloplasty with separation of perineal masculinization from phallus reconstruction works better. In this expert opinion article, the authors strive to give an overview of the principles behind, and a detailed explanation of, the technical details of creating the penile and bulbar urethra during phalloplasty. The authors focus on the three most common strategies: single-stage phalloplasty; two-stage phalloplasty with a metoidioplasty-first approach; and two-stage phalloplasty with a phalloplasty-first (Big Ben method) approach. It is not the authors' intent to establish the "best" or "only" way, but rather to compile different options with their respective pros and cons.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33890903 DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg ISSN: 0032-1052 Impact factor: 5.169