Literature DB >> 33888339

The impact of expanding gynecologic oncology care to ovarian cancer patients in small cities and rural communities.

Emma Jane Swayze1, Lauren Strzyzewski1, Pooja Avula1, Aaron L Zebolsky1, Anna V Hoekstra2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with ovarian cancer from smaller cities and rural communities face unique challenges in accessing comprehensive care. This study compares management strategies, outcomes, and access to care for patients in a small city and surrounding rural communities before and after establishing a full-time gynecologic oncology (GO) office.
METHODS: A local tumor registry was used to identify patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer before and after a full-time GO office was established. Quantitative analyses were used to compare disease characteristics, management strategies, overall survival, and distance traveled for care between cohorts.
RESULTS: Out of 381 patients, 171 women were diagnosed prior to establishing a full-time GO office (pre-GO) and 210 after (post-GO). Post-GO patients were more likely to undergo surgery by a GO specialist (97.1% versus 53.2%, p < 0.01), receive surgery locally (79.0% versus 43.3%, p < 0.01), and undergo complete lymph node dissection (63.3% versus 38.6%, p < 0.01). Patients treated with chemotherapy by GO increased from 10.3% pre-GO to 76.9% post-GO. 5-year survival rates were 33.8% versus 49.5% in the pre-GO and post-GO groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Median survival time increased from 30.8 months to 52.5 months from pre-GO to post-GO time periods. Distance patients traveled for surgery decreased from a mean of 47.9 miles pre-GO to 26.8 miles post-GO.
CONCLUSION: After establishing a full-time GO office within a small city, local patients had significantly improved overall survival and access to care. These results highlight the benefit of expanding GO care into small cities with surrounding rural communities and may be used to address public health discrepancies for women across the country.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disparities; Gynecologic oncologists; Gynecologic oncology; Obstetrics and gynecology; Ovarian cancer; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33888339     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  2 in total

1.  Management of the Adnexal Mass: Considerations for the Family Medicine Physician.

Authors:  Brian Bullock; Lisa Larkin; Lauren Turker; Kate Stampler
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-05

2.  Association of Distance to Gynecologic Oncologist and Survival in a Rural Midwestern State.

Authors:  Keely K Ulmer; Breanna Greteman; Megan McDonald; Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet; Mary E Charlton; Sarah Nash
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-08-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.