Literature DB >> 33888286

Comparison between PHITS and GEANT4 Simulations of the Heavy Ion Beams at the BEVALAC at LBNL and the Booster Accelerator at BNL.

Sungmin Pak1, Francis A Cucinotta2.   

Abstract

Heavy charged particles have been discussed for clinical use due to their superior dose-depth distribution compared to conventional radiation such as X-rays. In addition, high-charge and energy (HZE) ions in galactic cosmic rays (GCR) present important health risks for crewed space missions to the Earth's moon or Mars. Experiments at heavy ion accelerators are used in radiobiology studies; however, numerical simulations of track segment or Bragg peak irradiations are complicated by the details of the beam-line and dosimetry systems. The goal of the present work is in support of biophysics modeling of historical radiobiology data at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) and more recent results from the Brookhaven National Lab (BNL) facility (NASA Space Radiation Lab (NSRL)). In this work, the Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) of 4He, 12C, and 20Ne particles, and a Bragg curve of 56Fe ion have been simulated numerically in the geometries of LBNL and BNL using the Monte-Carlo based PHITS and GEANT4 simulation toolkits. The dose contributions of primary particles and secondary particles, including neutrons and photons, in the target material are computed and discussed as well. Comparisons suggest more contributions of secondaries in GEANT4 simulations compared to PHITS simulations, and less statistical fluctuation and better prediction of neutrons in PHITS simulations. Neutrons and gamma-rays are estimated to make minor contributions to absorbed doses for these beams.
Copyright © 2021 The Committee on Space Research (COSPAR). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33888286      PMCID: PMC8071601          DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2021.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)        ISSN: 2214-5524


  20 in total

1.  BNL accelerator-based radiobiology facilities.

Authors:  D I Lowenstein
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 2.  Heavy ion therapy: status and perspectives.

Authors:  O Jäkel; D Schulz-Ertner; C P Karger; A Nikoghosyan; J Debus
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-10

3.  Radial distribution of electron spectra from high-energy ions.

Authors:  F A Cucinotta; R Katz; J W Wilson
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  The future of heavy ion radiotherapy.

Authors:  Oliver Jäkel; Christian P Karger; Jürgen Debus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Measurements of energetic particle radiation in transit to Mars on the Mars Science Laboratory.

Authors:  C Zeitlin; D M Hassler; F A Cucinotta; B Ehresmann; R F Wimmer-Schweingruber; D E Brinza; S Kang; G Weigle; S Böttcher; E Böhm; S Burmeister; J Guo; J Köhler; C Martin; A Posner; S Rafkin; G Reitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Heavy ion carcinogenesis and human space exploration.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Francis A Cucinotta
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  The propagation of relativistic heavy ions in multielement beam lines.

Authors:  W Schimmerling; M Rapkin; M Wong; J Howard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Risks of cognitive detriments after low dose heavy ion and proton exposures.

Authors:  Francis A Cucinotta; Eliedonna Cacao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Harderian Gland Tumorigenesis: Low-Dose and LET Response.

Authors:  Polly Y Chang; Francis A Cucinotta; Kathleen A Bjornstad; James Bakke; Chris J Rosen; Nicholas Du; David G Fairchild; Eliedonna Cacao; Eleanor A Blakely
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Non-Targeted Effects Models Predict Significantly Higher Mars Mission Cancer Risk than Targeted Effects Models.

Authors:  Francis A Cucinotta; Eliedonna Cacao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Flying without a Net: Space Radiation Cancer Risk Predictions without a Gamma-ray Basis.

Authors:  Francis A Cucinotta
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 6.208

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.